On the point of HC refrigerents: They are at least 30% more efficient than any conventional CFC's (R12), HCFC's (R22), and, worst of all, HFC's (R134a). I have used HC's and they work great. As an example, R600a--which is isobutane, is an ideal refrigerant for ice boxes and apparently is being successfully used by some European manufacturers.
When the EPA banned the manufacture of chlorinated halogen refrigerents, it had to protect the chemical industry (i.e., big business) and give something back. The industry got patent protection on a difficult-to-make product as well as regulatory incentives and favoritism. R134a also receives a non-flammable rating (?) even though it is more combustible and toxic than HC's! Hmmm....
Worse yet, what we got out of the deal is R134a, an HFC which is a really poor and all-around lousy, inefficient refrigerant that costs too much.
It seems as if no one wants you to know that you can run a purified grade of Propane (in place of R22) in you home air conditioner, get better cooling capacity with the same equipment and save >30% on energy use.
Here's one HC manufacturers link with some interesting info.
http://www.hychill.com.au/tech/
As I have said, I have used HC's with very good results and can recommend them for most applications: including R12, and R134 retrofits.
---changing topics now---
Designgeek wrote: "...I'm told that those solid state diode thingies that work on DC (you find them in portable cooling chests and tiny micro-fridges designed to chill a single can of soda) are actually far less efficient than compressors & coils. Anyone have info/opinions on that point?..."
Yes, They are know as PELTIER coolers and they are only 20% to 30% efficient overall (i.e., very poor), depending on conditions. I have considerable experience with them and can tell you that they are not normally used for general refrigeration; rather, they are often specified for industrial and military apps where you have to cool an enclosure, equipment or cabinet and/or you have limited space, limited access and/or must eliminate moving parts to meet specialized reliability and MTBF requirements.
When the EPA banned the manufacture of chlorinated halogen refrigerents, it had to protect the chemical industry (i.e., big business) and give something back. The industry got patent protection on a difficult-to-make product as well as regulatory incentives and favoritism. R134a also receives a non-flammable rating (?) even though it is more combustible and toxic than HC's! Hmmm....
Worse yet, what we got out of the deal is R134a, an HFC which is a really poor and all-around lousy, inefficient refrigerant that costs too much.
It seems as if no one wants you to know that you can run a purified grade of Propane (in place of R22) in you home air conditioner, get better cooling capacity with the same equipment and save >30% on energy use.
Here's one HC manufacturers link with some interesting info.
http://www.hychill.com.au/tech/
As I have said, I have used HC's with very good results and can recommend them for most applications: including R12, and R134 retrofits.
---changing topics now---
Designgeek wrote: "...I'm told that those solid state diode thingies that work on DC (you find them in portable cooling chests and tiny micro-fridges designed to chill a single can of soda) are actually far less efficient than compressors & coils. Anyone have info/opinions on that point?..."
Yes, They are know as PELTIER coolers and they are only 20% to 30% efficient overall (i.e., very poor), depending on conditions. I have considerable experience with them and can tell you that they are not normally used for general refrigeration; rather, they are often specified for industrial and military apps where you have to cool an enclosure, equipment or cabinet and/or you have limited space, limited access and/or must eliminate moving parts to meet specialized reliability and MTBF requirements.