Hi Jeff. I am from the 1950's when front load washers had water coming 1/4 to 1/3 of the way up the window. But with today's mania to save water (please see my thread "leave our washers alone), while people are filling their pools, watering their lawns, taking long showers, etc, everyone I talk to is in favor of low water level front loaders.
I have a friend in Palm Springs, Ca where I used to live. I was back there for New Years. He wears his white socks around the house like slippers so they were very soiled. He washed them in his new Frigidaire Affinity in hot water and bleach.
I watched the machine in horror as I did NOT see any water in the tub. All I saw was wet clothes sloshing around.
The socks did NOT come out clean. A front loader with a decent amount of water still uses less than a top loader. Why is the water level left up to the computer instead of us?
And also, front loaders cost more than many top loaders. I got a Maytag/Whirltag less than a year ago for $399.00 and it washes like a champ. I was just in Best Buy where they featured an LG set by the front door at $1,999.00 EACH!!!...add on taxes and delivery and it costs $4,500.00. I do not understand that with the economy as it is, that people would spend that much when they can get a Whirltag set for less than $1,000.00 and it cleans better.
Ross