GM Frigidaire 1-18 Washtub Capacity

[jetcone]

If you

use a laundry bag for fine items it wont allow buckles and such to get caught under the bottom cone and squished.

 

As for torn underwear I've never seen that in 30 years of using Jet Action washers. In fact my 3 speed 1-18 on the hand wash cycle cleans and handles knitted wool better than any machine out there- including front loaders.

When you can safely wash a Norwegian sweater and not felt it that is impressive washing action.

 

I will have to experience that Norge 20 pounder as Ive not seen more capacity than in my 1-18's.

Gansky tells me i'm gonna love my super capacity Lady Kenmore with the super surgilator, gotta set that one up soon for comparison washing.

 

 

[brucelucenta]

Having run a commercial drycleaners and laundry for over 25 years, I have used a great many machines. I have used Norge, Whirlpool/Kenmore and Frigidaire along with big front load commercial machines for shirt laundry. All of them worked satisfactorily, but the Frigidaire 1-18 machines held the biggest loads and spun them out dry enough to press on the hot head press equipment. Just from personal experience, they are not the gentlest of machines to clothing. Especially when heavily loaded. The early models up to the time they introduced the jet cone agitator would literally tie clothing in knots. Even the 1-18 ones were bad about tangling very large loads of shirts sometimes, but it didn't matter because the shirts were pressed while damp anyway. When I used a Norge or Whirlpool I could not load it as heavily because it would not be able to turn the load like a Frigidaire would. One 1-18 Frigidaire would hold what a commercial 25 lb front load machine would hold and wash it well. The Norge and Whirlpool simply would not do that. Just saying from personal experience. The GE largest load machine would not even come close.

 

[jeb]

Laundry bag

While I agree a laundry bag helped with small things, it is hard to put adult bib overalls in one. I had several parts ruined it the 1-18 (I even bought replacement buckles but they never fit right). The laundry bag did not help with the underwire bras, although it did help them not tear up other clothing in the load. After you ruin a few $45.00 dollar bras and pairs of bib overall you learn not to trust it with these things.

 

[scrubflex]

Hmm, so it seems, certain clothing should or must be washed on the gentler speed to be on the safe side. Or, shorten the wash times since the Jet-Cone could be so aggressive with the clothes. That's what I'll do do when I find my WIC-A 1-18. My Whirlpool Gold DD washer tangled my laundry also, that's not too big of a deal for me. The DD "High-Frequency" agitation creates super (ROLL-OVER) currents like the Jet-Cone, even turned shirts and pants inside out...not a problem.
I would still love to see a video of the Jet-Cone in action with the water level above the top cone to see the action. It's never been filmed before. (HINT, hint)

 

[philr]

Here's one!  Sorry, I did put too much detergent... 

 

 



 

 

 I filmed the exact same load at the "Normal" level during the rinse cycle:

 



[this post was last edited: 1/20/2015-04:04]

 

[jetcone]

Nice to hear your experience Bruce

I would have guessed the same result, that the 1-18 has the largest capacity of all top loaders ever built.

 

 

 

[scrubflex]

Awesome

Phil I see from the 1st video, anymore water then MAXI, would have made it impossible for the Jet-Cone (TOP) cone to push the load down into the tub.

2nd video, the Jet-Cone is really a very powerful agitator. Seems like it only needed a little more water to rinse that big load...not necessarily the MAXI level.

Thanks for the videos Phil...and she's very quiet.

Bruce thanks for helping to make it crystal clear that the 1-18 capacity is TOPS, hands down.

BTW, Jon L hope you haven't changed your mind about sharing your "QUIETING TECHNIQUE" with us.

 

[scrubflex]

Phil are your videos on YouTube?

 

[philr]

Yes they are:

 

rivgs67

Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

www.youtube.com

 

The load was a mix of towels and bed sheets. One of them being very lightweight but thick! So it weights about 14 pounds but it filled the tub when there was no water.

You're right, the turnover would have been great with the water level just above "Normal". There's no way I could have fitted that load in my other washers. Maybe I should try in a 12 pound solid tub machine. I think it would be seriously overloaded like the one in my avatar!

http://https//www.youtube.com/channel/UCfzIOjgBfLiZBKgtEE7ZdJQ

 

[scrubflex]

Yeah, I don't think it'll work but, you'll have fun finding out. I'll check out your videos.

 

[norgeway]

RE Norge...

While the Norge will was a huge load..It will also wear out clothes faster than anything else..it really is much harsher than the 1-18,the Frigidaires do a great job and in my experience don't tear up the clothes...BUT if you have greasy nasty work clothes, a Norge is TOUGH to beat!...as far as a Frigidaire goes the old 3 ring agitator models will outwash any of the others...if the clothes are tangled up....that means they have really been moved around!

 

[jetcone]

Amen

Hans !!

 

[washerlover]

As much as I hate to agree, Norge/Wards can be pretty brutal on clothes. I think they should have stuck with the 3-vane agitator instead of moving to the 4-vane in the late 60s. I have a 4-vane '74 Wards Signature and a '65-6ish Norge with 3-vanes. Same fast stroke, but the number of vanes do make a difference. Never had any trouble with my 1-18 being rough on clothes. If anything, I'd say Frigidaire was probably the most gentle on fabrics.

 

[scrubflex]

I guess the 3/4 HP motor combined with the Turbosweep (4-Way Deep-Clean) agitator, 202 agitation arc and 70 or 72 agitation stroke was too tough for the clothes...especially if overloaded. But, what I can remember from my uncle and aunts late 80's Norge, it washed a load of jeans on the MED level very poorly. I could not understand how bad the Turbosweep performed. It could not turnover the jeans, just threw them around...no rolling movement.

 

[scrubflex]

Great videos Phil.

 

[scrubflex]

Phil, when I look at your MAXI level video, can't help thinking what will the Jet Cone action look like if there was more water added to the tub. Hope you'll make a video showing that action.

 

[jetcone]

1-18 Hand wash

amazing !!

http://https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_BPKDvEnAE

 

[combo52]

Frigidaire Washer Videos

Always love the solid tub Ripiddry 1010 washers, great videos Jon.

 

The 1-18 3SP washer is very,  gentile in agitation, I would also give GE FF washer high marks when using the Mini-Basket at low speeds and the 68-72 Lady Kenmore's with 3SP motors and the Vaira-Flex agitators. Does anyone have any other TL washers tat they consider very gentile on delicate fabrics?.

 

I still give the all time award to a Calypso when using the Hand Wash cycle, we have one AW member that actually washes loads of Bounty paper towels in his machine without problems, Jon this might be a good test for the 1-18.

 

[philr]

Bounty paper towels?! How about trying with cheaper ones!?

 

[brucelucenta]

I would have to look at back issues to tell you, but one year consumer reports did a comparison of washers that were all one speed machines to see how gentle they could be with sheer draperies. Frigidaire 1-18 was #1 for a one speed machine in gentleness.