Ignis Superautomatica become SuperECOLOGICA

[lavamat78800]

No, I don´t think they had a storage tank..but I don´t know.
I can´t compare it to Indesit, because I never was interested in such unknown brands over here in Germany!
I don´t know much about washing machines made before the 90´s because im born in 91.

 

[vivalalavatrice]

Thank you Stefan

Good to know what you described...

Yes, I was just intendeed to be tomorrow's washers like those of that period when you could store the water...

The evolution is the you could store not tonly the last but the LAST TWO rinses. So as you could be able to wash without aggressive detergent (youse a salt like potassium hydroxide) your last two rinses water could be EASIER regenerated.

Main-wash and pre-wash water perfomr the first frame of the cycle, then the 3 or the 4 cycles of rinse water perform in the second one.

Thanks for the precious information...so know I know that something of concrete exists...

Diomede

PS: Nino, Yes there were some seventies Indesit here with the sudsaving system.

 

[mrboilwash]

Diomede, I`m glad if my info was helpful, but I`m not even 100% sure if it was a Quelle catalogue. We also had "Baur" then it could also have been a "Foron" machine.
As far as I know, Foron was an East German appliance brand of low quality but after the German reunion they had some innovative solutions for the enviroment, like the first CFC-free fridge. However a washer which stores water for reuse was a no-go back then and I guess most consumers still think the same way.

 

[vivalalavatrice]

However a washer which stores water for reuse was a no-go ba

Stefan, you're right saying this...but how many very important things about everything we buy everyday are shutting up?!

We mustn't say nothing of false... just not to say all the truth The water storing should be proposed to the customers as a "secondary conseguence" of the more impoartant festurse that's he will be allowed to wash with 110 litres of water per cycles only wasting 50l.

The trend to minimize water in wash cycle (which is leading us
to consider "humid" and not in-water the opposit of the dry cleaning system) justify the no more need to save the water in such a lot of litres/gallons used in a cycle...

But is there anyone who will accept a washer like that you described (with the no-stink-beep) which save the water with all the bad conseguences you're saying the consumers wouldn't accept in order to wash splashing like so few washing machines we saw/heard in our life?

Diomede

 

[chestermikeuk]

No Stink Beep...

Hi Diomede, that one made me laugh, imagine the salesmen having to explain that one!!! ALTHOUGH, its an excellent feature to have on a machine, My ideal machine would have variable time, temp, spin speed & water level, along with speed of agitation, link that with water tanks labelled "Spin -To-Save" that would be purfect....

Love the detail on your programming, it would be interesting to see it run on say Roberts Super Unimatic front loader!!!!

Keep up the good work, Mike

 

[vivalalavatrice]

imagine the salesmen having to explain that one!!!

Mike... honestly it makes me laugh either! But as I said designing means for me to be always in looking for a solution to a problem... in this case the water could stink? Provide a beep function! The beep function in not good longer? The machine drains automatically the stinky water after a preset period (12h i.e.)

Thanks for compliments and for collaboration

IMHO I would prefer this one with 110l washing cycle use than those Oriental washers (and Haier France made something like that too) which use ONE WATER FILL ONLY but with the electrolys would like to remove the dirt. Of course that this would be an effective way...but would you trust in machine washing a laundry with one fill only and without absolutely any other rinse cycles further!?