DD vs Dependable Care
My guess is DDs had more capacity (one of the big reasons DDs sold more), the factory more advanced, easier to service over all, less raw metal, no need to redesign the agitator for more aggressive cleaning, and I'll give a bet that in 2006 Whirlpool had already made a decision to cease DD production as a whole in the next 10 years.
At that point keeping Dependable cares in production would not make any financial sense, considering the average person does not know, or care, about the difference between the two or what took their place altogether.
Now, if everyone was like me the dependable cares would have become the new DDs. Heck, the DDs would never have even caught on to begin with. But sadly, and perhaps less so today but very common back then, US culture tends to be anti intellectual. Not looking for what lasts the longest or the best in the long term, but rather what ticks superficial boxes at the time of purchase.
My guess is DDs had more capacity (one of the big reasons DDs sold more), the factory more advanced, easier to service over all, less raw metal, no need to redesign the agitator for more aggressive cleaning, and I'll give a bet that in 2006 Whirlpool had already made a decision to cease DD production as a whole in the next 10 years.
At that point keeping Dependable cares in production would not make any financial sense, considering the average person does not know, or care, about the difference between the two or what took their place altogether.
Now, if everyone was like me the dependable cares would have become the new DDs. Heck, the DDs would never have even caught on to begin with. But sadly, and perhaps less so today but very common back then, US culture tends to be anti intellectual. Not looking for what lasts the longest or the best in the long term, but rather what ticks superficial boxes at the time of purchase.