Chance -
There's a brand new 63594 on ebay with free shipping for $11.95. This is the dispenser that everyone loved to hate (women at least) as I'm told because the blue snap ring has broken many a fingernail for women when the try to release these.
Pure Shredmore Bob? I must differ with you. I have one of these too, mine is a 70 series, same identical timer, but the second rinse is non-wired so its a giant OFF. My machine is very low mileage, but I've never had anything shredded or had it even come close. The speed shift isn't there either -- the Heavy Duty cycle is all fast agitation, and the Normal is 100% low speed agitation with fast spin.
This is a 1992 model machine (I am guessing something like Kenmore model 110.922821x0, is that right Chance?). These were the first models with the new cycle arrangement with Normal and Heavy Duty. The normal was designed to cut-down on extended abuse (which goes along with Bob's shredmore claim) of high speed agitation that many consumers were subjecting their close to in earlier model versions, as they were setting their Direct Drives as they had their belt-drives previously, with 12-14 minutes of high speed agitation on the old Cotton Sturdy cycle. 1986 and 1988 DDs had essentially identical cycle layouts, model for model, to the 1983 Kenmore belt-drives. These 1992 models seeked to alter that somewhat so clothes would get better or more appropriate care.
I have included a picture of my machine for comparison.
When I use this machine, a full water level load is washed on Heavy Duty, but almost never more than 10 minutes. Partial level loads, unless they are very heavy items like towels or jeans, are washed on Normal at the 10-minute setting. Seems to work well that way.
One thing I can say about this machine - it handles mixed weight loads differently than a belt-drive, in fact, some mixed loads I wouldn't put in a belt drive. If you mix sheets with heavier cotton shirts/shorts/etc. the sheets can interfere with roll-over in the DD. That would not be an issue in a BD, however, BDs don't like to spin mixed-weight loads unless they are uniformly distributed. DDs don't make nearly the fuss in spin, at least in my experience.
Gordon
