What constitutes a classic now?
Bajaespuma,
I know what you mean about the classic simplicity of the old Kitchenaids. Lord knows I had enough of those versions growing up. From a 12 thru the 17 and 17a and have to say that even though KA followed the crowd with dual washarms, they DID improve the performance of their machines.
If the user WAS careful enough to laod the older models correctly, the results were fine. If not..Oh well, just do another load! Took my Mom a few months I would say to get it rightwith our KDS15 and I was always reloading it and making sure the top wasn't blocked. Then eventually I installed the KDS21D, which I still have in my garage, and she loved it.
If we talk about changes to a classic design, what about Maytag moving the big plates back to the bottom rack? Which setup really cleaned better? You guys would have to tell me your own experiences.
Many times it IS in response to market pressure to have the same features as another manufacturer but how well it is executed separates the big guys from the little guys.
I don't know anyone who complained about the way a Maytag cleaned nor anyone complaining about the 18 and up units from Hobart.
But it didn't take a rocket scientist to know that a D&M machine fed the upper arm by means of the drain pump impeller so any crap that got macerated down there, went right back up onto the dishware in the upper rack. They had just about no filtering media to separate the crud out. Sure, lots of water and rinses usually got rid of most of the crud eventually.
And don't think we didn't have lots of yuck on top of the cups and bowls in the KDS15. It filtered the water well, but didn't do as good a job as the 16 and 17 with the constant rinse (a misnomer there)arm on the top of the tank.
When the 18 came out I asked my Uncle who was a service manager at Hobart why they added the arm and he said it was because the other brands had it. Then he added that a machine with a powerful enough pump no matter who makes it with a single arm will still clean well. When you split the water output between two arms, the lower arm delivers less water now to the dishes.It took Hobart a long time to change the design of their washarms to a smaller water jet which increased the pressure on the plate surfaces without needing more water to do it. Of course KA was gone by then, but isnt that waht we see on all the machines now? Go and see how small the jet holes are on a current Hydrosweep arm. It is amazing the new machines get anything clean and I can't begine to imagine how much less comes out when the machine has the Power Scour jets in the back!
And just how well could that 3 racked Maytag clean when it was splitting the water up even more. BTW did they provide it with a 1/2 or 1/3 hp motor?
I once put the 17 rack in our 18 just to annoy my wife and see what she would do.
It was a short test.. She did nothing. She left the dishes in the sink and went to watch tv! I got to play with the machine but I put the right rack back in.
She is so loyal to that rack design, she will not let me put the now 2 year old brand new Kitchenaid I have in the box in the garage in to replace the 18/now 20 series daily driver.
It all comes down to a matter of taste. No doubt the old models were great and there are still thousands out there. But there has got to be a good reason why the 18 is such a beloved machine! Just like the Classic 17 and 17A With the 21 right there as an up and coming classic.