Thanks!
Hi guys, sorry for the tardy replies; I was out of town over the weekend :-|
Ben -- WOW, I love that performance Caddy! Eight liters?? Good grief!! I want that steering wheel, though. The leather on mine looks like a bad banana peel.
Rick -- LOL, it took me a while until I realized that 8-6-4 was the correct order, not 4-6-8. But it makes sense; you're not driving a four-cylinder all the time

I will look for that switch and see what I can find--it'd be great if they did it that way, and didn't do something silly like cutting wires. Thanks also for the info that the modulated displacement is safe for the engine--I will feel better, and Will probably will as well
Yes, I read about those HT4100 engines, and all the horror stories. I especially liked the way they could round-off the cam lobes and still sit there and idle happily at 400 RPM. Thankfully, most stories about the 368s have been pretty tame--nothing particularly out of the ordinary.
Greg -- Thanks! Yes, that's a Regal next door. It's been low-rider'ed, and smells like a coal furnace when it starts up in the morning. It also leaks more oil than the Valdez. It belongs to the downstairs neighbor. It has the 5.0 Litre engine, but would appear to have no piston rings left. Nevertheless, it has megasound and a DVD entertainment system. Go figure.
Though most of the automakers have revived Displacement-on-Demand, my friend here at work who has a 2006 Dakota says it still has noticeable lag and jerks when cylinders are activated or deactivated.
I don't think that the technology has changed much; it's just that, like Rick said, it really pissed people off to have something that was jerky and intrusive on a car that was supposed to be the essence of smoothness. Had they done it on a Chevy, no one probably would have cared
