It's too bad Speed Queen doesn't do more advertising. They could sell truckloads of their washers to disgruntled owners of HE top-loaders. They're the only game in town if you're looking for a traditional, agitator-based washer that uses enough water for an agitator to do its job properly.
Front-loaders can get away with using less water because clothes are tumbled. Manufacturers keep trying---and failing---to find ways to get a top-loader to agitate a load with little water. The result? Hundreds of user complaints about damage to fabrics, poor cleaning, and frequent unbalanced loads.
Quite honestly, I think it's time manufacturers of top-loaders realized it would actually be a boon to sales to proclaim "THIS IS NOT AN HE WASHER" given that people have come to loathe any machine with "HE" printed on the console.
I checked user reviews at Consumer Reports online, and only 6 of 90 reviews were negative. Several of those had to do with the same issue: A manufacturing error in which grease trapped between the tubs was leaving marks on clothes. One user complained that suds was backing up out of the drain pipe (obviously not the machine's fault). Many reviews begin with some variation on "I can't believe CR gives this washer such a poor score!"