I was researching top load washers and saw the new Maytag 4.7 Top load washer model MVWB765FW which looks like it offers both deep fill or water saver options and an agitator, agitation from what I see on youtube looks good, and spin speed is 900 RPM which sounds good as well. I am wondering if anyone on this site knows anything about these models or if anyone has experience with them? The reviews I have read are very positive on this model as well. I would appreciate any information anyone could share on this model washer. I don't think it is particularly attractive but it does have a see through lid as well which I like. This seems like a reasonably priced unit if one cannot afford the high prices of other brands like Speed Queen.
Maytag 4.7 Top load agitator washer - anyone know about it?
- Thread starter ryanm
- Start date
Help Support :
our own JoeyPete has one of those.......
I have the smaller 3.6 cu ft MWVC415EW and I love it! I have been using it since 12-15-16 and my whites have not been so white since I last owned a Maytag wringer washer back on 73'. The Powerwash and Deep Water cycles do fantastic job of getting out stains using hot water. I use the Powerwash cycle, hot water, heavy soil level and presoak option for whites. It only takes 55 to 60 mins and my white socks have never been cleaner! I have been using Tide Pods and Oxi Clean Pods with the whites, instead of LCB and the results are exceptional. Yes, it does use a little more water than a new FL, but nowhere near what a traditional TL uses. And if I do want to have a full fill for large, bulky or extremely soiled items I have the option to select the Bulky cycle. The only thing that I would change is to have an option for an extended spin. But let me tell you, I have done at least 50 loads now and I've never had one time when this machine didn't do exactly what it was supposed to do and never had a load take more that 60 mins. The average cycle time is 45 to 50 mins. I've washed both very large items like kingsized quilted bedspreads and comforters or 2 king size pillows at a time as well as every other kind of load from small to large and this machine handled all these loads without a hitch. The LG FL that this replaced many times took over 2 hrs to complete a load and the whites were never as clean as this Maytag gets them. I would have to conclude that the larger 4.7 cu ft model would be at least as good, or better. I give these machines two thumbs up.
I know that there are many people on AW that would disagree with me, but I wonder if they have even used one of these machines? The proof is in the pudding. But I certainly wouldn't tell these people that their preferences in washing machines are wrong, they are what they like, as are mine.
Eddie[this post was last edited: 2/8/2017-12:57]
I know that there are many people on AW that would disagree with me, but I wonder if they have even used one of these machines? The proof is in the pudding. But I certainly wouldn't tell these people that their preferences in washing machines are wrong, they are what they like, as are mine.
Eddie[this post was last edited: 2/8/2017-12:57]
My grandmother now has this machine actually, and she really likes it. To use her words, "the clothes feel squeaky clean and crisp, not slicky like they did in my old washer where I had to rinse everything twice". She brags about it everytime we get on the phone, about how she likes the lights and how it's so quiet she forgets it's on. She says she's only used the Deep Fill option once or twice because it uses more water than she thinks it needs, and seems happy with the water it uses automatically. Since having my BravosXL, she likes watching it run when she's here, so I think that acclimated her to seeing lower water levels and how the clothes roll from the middle to the outside. I haven't gotten to see or try it out in person since this is the grandmother that lives in Montgomery, but from Joeypete's videos, it seems to do a fantastic job with movement with both HE water levels and deep fills.
bobbi
Well-known member
GREAT turnover! It does look like it performs very well.
stricklybojack
Well-known member
.
What do you think of Fisher & Paykel washers Eduardo?
What do you think of Fisher & Paykel washers Eduardo?
Thanks to everyone for their replies to my post, very much appreciated. I am glad to know that the experiences have been very good with those here who have this machine, it is the first machine with agitator other than Speed Queen that seems to have a good response in reviews from folks who have purchased them. If cost is an issue it seems this is a reasonable choice as Speed Queen is very costly (price has gone quite high since my purchase 8 years ago) and not everyone can afford that kind of money. Reliability is yet to be seen but these days I don't think anything will last as long as the older machines from years past. We had a family of 8 growing up with a Maytag that ran for 18 years with no repairs, our Norge also lasted 18 or so years with no repairs, so these days it is a shame that product is just not made as well, not even the Speed Queen which lasted 8 years (shortest time span for any washer we owned) for my family of 7, doing about 10 loads a week. Now we only have 3 in the house so I hope any new machine we choose will last longer. I do like to hear all different opinions and appreciate the input here on this website, it is so interesting to me and a wealth of information here from all of you.... Thanks
brucelucenta
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,924
Careful what you say about speed queen......the speed queen propaganda police on this site will GET YA!!!! Besides, don't you know that those speed queen machines last for 25-30 years normally.......musta been something you did wrong when using it. Yeah, right...like maybe you used it to wash dirty clothes! LOL
twintubdexter
Well-known member
What is that clunking noise? It scares me. If my car sounded like that I'd high-tail it to the shop. Watching that Maytag logo on the agitator top spin around makes me dizzy, of course I'm naturally dizzy anyway.
mrb627
Well-known member
So...
The deep water wash applies to the wash only.
Rinsing is at low level?
Malcolm
The deep water wash applies to the wash only.
Rinsing is at low level?
Malcolm
iheartmaytag
Well-known member
That's a little backwards isn't it?
I would almost think that a rinse in lots of water would be more beneficial.
I would almost think that a rinse in lots of water would be more beneficial.
I've checked mine during the rinse on the Deep Water cycle and it fills with just as much water on the rinse as it does during the wash. I have found that this washer rinses just as well or better than any washer I've ever owned. Never any residual detergent left on the clothes. This is the same for the Powerwash which also uses more water than normal as well as the Bulky Cycle. And I can assure you that this washer uses more water that the LG FL did, when I used Water Plus, which I always found necessary.
Eddie
Eddie
runematic
Well-known member
To the OP, look for the MVWB766FW model at an independent appliance store. It's the same washer but comes with a full 5 year parts & labor warranty. We've sold a few of these models & so far the reviews I've heard from customers are positive.
mrb627
Well-known member
Video
This video seems to not deep fill on the rinse.
Malcolm
This video seems to not deep fill on the rinse.
Malcolm
washerdude
Well-known member
I can't help but notice how quiet this machine is!
Quiet?Whirr-Clunk-Whirr?How well does the circulation do with a "Bob-Load" and completely water filled tub?The tub indexes when the machine agitates.Think I will save for a SQ!And the pretty control panel lights worry me if thunderstorms attack!!!You will have to unplug this one!
There is no correlation between the amount of agitation vs. the amount the tub indexes. It's designed to index. The planetary gear torque converter allows the motor to push against the basket rather than the entire tub, which prevents the outer tub from twisting back and forth by the force and instead that force is transferred to movement of the basket. The BPM motor is able to sense the amount of indexing to make sure that there is the same level of agitation in both directions regardless of the weight or size of the load. That means if there is nothing in the washer, and the agitator makes exact 360 degree oscillations each way, then the tub may barely index at all. With a heavy load, the motor ensures the agitator will still reach 360 degrees each way, but the tub will index more, absorbing the torsion of the increased load and keeping it off the outer tub and suspension. This was a design update coming up from the Oasis/SmartDrive platform, where when washing a heavy load, you can see the outer tub violently twisting opposite the agitation direction. While it didn't cause major widespread issues, I can see why they would make the change. In addition yet unrelated to the indexing subject, the planetary gearbox takes stress off the motor by allowing the rotor to spin 2-3 times for every 1 rotation of the agitator, rather than 1 for 1, such as the way my Oasis works.
Similar threads
