Maytag to GE Console Adaptation

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Chetlaham

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
4,237
Location
United States
How well would this GE console fit on a Whirlpool produced Maytag MEDC300XW0 dryer? Obviously it may not fit perfectly, however I want to know if it is viable to begin with.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a74312b2b13caa05dad488699acdcff99a61cd7b76a9a0ff1429bda3d7897d75.png


 

 

 

 

MEDC300XW.jpg


 

 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
The listing comes with the back panel, I'm guessing all I will need are a few self taping machine screws.

 

 

Any idea if the lengths are identical?

 

 

It would be a dream to have a GE control system on a Whirlpool platform. 
 
Anything is possible

The Maytag dryer does not have a dual heating element so you'll have to figure a workaround for the GE temperature system right off the bat. The GE console is 27 inches wide while Maytag one is 29 inches wide.

The control system is obviously much better on the current Maytag dryer Where you have a nice auto dry cycle and real temperature control not just an input reduction.

John L
 
Thank you John!

 

 

I might just swap the timers then and re-numerate the console on the Maytag. The timer should physically fit.

 

 

Temp control will remain off/low/med/high via bias thermostat as is now. I could implement a Whirlpool dual heating element like they did on their original MED5920TW0 Centennials though I don't think its worth the added effort and the disadvantage of thinner elements vs the single element I have in there now.

 

 

c6cc8df8590a21002d30137c850cd7d29972fd3f0606218e5ca78a06ff992338.png


 

 

Will gladly trade the auto dry and subsequent wrinkle prevent for a genuine 130 minute timed dry cycle. 

 

 

   

 

 

[this post was last edited: 2/1/2025-08:11]
 
In an Ideal World

This is what my Maytag Centennial would look like, along with what would be millions of other machines:

 

 

9ecf6ea3096e54dc96953bff4d972b0f1f131346ac770a3e6d6e60c6b38a8143.png


 

 

    

 

Hi-limits and thermal fuses on both sides of the line, dual under-driven  2700 watt heaters, Mallory timer, lighted console, hamper door, lint whistle, shoe rack insert, medium heat cycling stat, porcelain enamel tops, 10 minute press care cool down, 5 minute regular cycle cool down, all in the Whirlpool top filter design but with seriously beefed up belt, rollers and cabinet.  

 

 

5b0a0e2d3ea5841078ddb52bbf4320f6027950a66558cafc0d164fb672213cec.png


 

 

 

 

One can fantasize about a practical workhorse with all the respectable home style features. Throw in a 10 year unlimited warranty with a lifetime heater warranty and I'm sold.  

 

 

Of course the next best thing would be to replicate this at home with some vintage GE parts. 
smiley-innocent.gif


 
 
Honestly, you might have gotten me on this one. My understanding, though limited, is that thinner elements sag and deflect more (with time) over a comparable distance. I'm curious how well Whirlpool has taken that into account when using the same set of supports and spacing for their double element dryers as they do for their standard single 5600 watt elements. Maybe they have, maybe less so... I generally don't like being the one to find out. 

 

 

I personally would like to see appliance manufacturers use higher wattage higher voltage elements adapted to the actual

nominal voltage. For example, putting 277 volt 7,450 watt elements in 240 volt dryers which would put out about 5,600 watts at 240 volts. The cooler running element would last much longer. Appliance makers should engineer dryer elements such that they will absolutely never fail with unobstructed exhaust ducting of reasonable length. 
 
Chet, your GE dryer has thinner, coils, thinner coils are not as heavy or less likely to sag. You have no engineering sense at all.

You designed a dryer that could run for over two hours at temperatures over 200° with dry clothing in it there's absolutely no safety in that type of design. It's absolutely ridiculous. No one would ever build it. They wouldn't be allowed to build it thankfully. The home insurance industry would ban that dryer.

The household voltage range in the United States runs from about 208 V for people with three phase service to nearly 250 V for a large percentage of people appliances. Need to be able to run in those ranges safely.

Whirlpool has not built a dryer with a 5600 W element in many decades , 5400 W is the highest they have built in years.

Almost every week I substitute a 3600 W element in 29 inch whirlpool dryers for the original 5400 W element where people have long vents and or voltage that is nearly 250 V to prevent repeat problems and service calls.

Why don't you use your talents to come up with some good ideas that could help the world. It's a shame that your personal situation keeps you from being able to actually go out and work on or see what happens to appliances in the real world. I hope you eventually find someway to actually help since you have so much interest. But because you have been so standoffish not giving the least a little bit of information about your own problems it's impossible for anybody else to help you as well, good luck

John L
 
Twisting reality

<blockquote>
GE dryer has thinner, coils, thinner coils are not as heavy or less likely to sag. You have no engineering sense at all.

</blockquote>
 

 

 

Anyone with a basic background in engineering or construction knows the thinner any material is over a given distance the more it will sag or buckle compared to same material of a greater thickness. This can literally be tested and observed by anyone.

 

 

 

<blockquote>
<span style="color: #ff6600;">You designed a dryer that could run for over two hours at temperatures over 200° with dry clothing in it there's absolutely no safety in that type of design. It's absolutely ridiculous. No one would ever build it. They wouldn't be allowed to build it thankfully. The home insurance industry would ban that dryer. </span>

 

 

 

</blockquote>
Uh John, those are called high limits. They are placed on and around the heater box while facing the heating element- which will always be much hotter than the rest of the dryer. A heater box and its radiant output can easily exceed 200*F without the rest of the dryer, exhaust, or clothing ever exceeding 200*F in either normal or emergency conditions.


 

Just because a heater box exceeds 200*F doesn't mean the rest of the dryer will exceed 200*F.

 

Since you grasp thermo dynamics better than Whirlpool, Maytag, GE,  Electrolux, Milele, ect you should give these guys a call and tell them they've been doing it wrong for over 100 years by specking 250*F to 360*F high limits. Tell them its ridiculous. Tell them those dryers should not be being built. Call insurance companies and let them in on this grandiose mistake. Contact UL, NRTLs. Tell your local fire department about it. 


 

In fact most tech sheet, service manual or even a parts bag will tell you those high limits are typically rated to trip in excess of 200*F on hundreds of millions of dryers.   

 


 


 

 

<blockquote>
<span style="color: #ff6600;">The household voltage range in the United States runs from about 208 V for people with three phase service to nearly 250 V for a large percentage of people appliances. Need to be able to run in those ranges safely. </span>

 

 

 

 

 

</blockquote>
And? I never stated or insinuated that appliances can't safely handle those voltages or their NEMA bandwidths.    

 

<blockquote>
<span style="color: #ff6600;">Almost every week I substitute a 3600 W element in 29 inch whirlpool dryers for the original 5400 W element where people have long vents and or voltage that is nearly 250 V to prevent repeat problems and service calls. </span>

</blockquote>
 

Thats just one way of solving premature heating element failures.


 

 

 

<blockquote>
<span style="color: #ff6600;">But because you have been so standoffish not giving the least a little bit of information</span>

 

 

 

</blockquote>
John, you are the problem. You're the reason you see what you see.


 

I posted a design concept with 350*F high limits as is normal for hundreds of millions of dryers, as dictated by physics, and then you go on to shamelessly insinuate I had proposed a dryer that would have drum, clothing and exhaust running in excess of 200*F.


 

Members who trust you then take your words as incontrovertible truth, become outraged at my misrepresented character, motives or intelligence and then place me on their block list. The divide only grow furthers with time as they can now only see your misconstrued posts but not my rebuttals calling you out on it. 

 

 

In cases such as these presenting any more information than needed for the topic at hand is of no help or advantage.

 

 

 

 

 

[this post was last edited: 2/2/2025-13:24]
 
Really, why the effort to "hot rod" a toggle-switch GE dryer and such a low-line model with a Maytag cabinet that's still going to be one that only the original controls will still work with?

Keep the dryer that's with those controls, it's the only thing equivalent to "street legal" as opposed to something that's still a mundane, modern Maytag out of place with what it competed with to be at the top of the heap...

Though putting an antiquated set of controls there won't at least to me won't improve it, given the battle with native technological elements just about all the esxperts here have chimed in with...

Try it with a halo of heat cabinet and drying if you really must, at least that's more era-correct...

So would be that GE cabinet Frankenstein'd with a Maytag-tiled center-dial dash, no?!

-- Dave
 
I will keep the heating system as is- it currently gives the perfect temperatures with its single element and bias thermostat. High limits and thermal fuses to remain as they are now for obvious reasons. In all honestly I prefer Whirlpools heat control system to GE's. 

 

 

The thing I am really after is the 130 minute unadulterated dry cycle. That is what I long for.  

 

70 minutes with medium heat switching to low heat half way through the cycle is not enough for a full load of heavy towels or stuffed pillows. The 10+ minute cool down then leaves the load room temperature cold. Yuck and depressing. It has been this way since day one. The vent system is unobstructed and short, and the dryer does not cycle on its high limit. 70 minute cycle is just enough to dry average loads, more than enough to dry small loads, but for large loads forget about it.

 

 

High heat might solve the issue with super loads coming out damp, however I rarely use high heat. Medium and low is the only setting I use. 155*F to hot.

 

 

The level of supposed fire risk is no more than me turning the dial back to 70 minutes once it has advanced to 40 or 50 minutes. 

 

 

 
 
130 minute dry cycle

That's ridiculous. You need a better washing machine even my huge loads of 12 bath sheets which are bath towels that are nearly 5 feet long and 3 feet wide, dry easily in about 60 minutes in my dryers.

It is considered very dangerous to run a dryer for an hour or more with dry clothing in it, it's also very hard on your clothing to say nothing of a waste of electricity or gas and inside air from your dwelling.

A well engineered product makes people's lives better. A dryer should shut off automatically when clothing is dry saving the machine wear and tear your clothing and reducing hazard and energy usage.

It's too bad you can't put your interest into something productive that actually has a chance of being built, you could actually patent things if You thought up something that was actually useful.

John L
 
The thing is with very large loads the clothing isn't dry at 60 minutes, it is still damp. So nothing is running dry for an extra 10-20 minutes. That is not dangerous or wasting energy when said energy is actually needed to fully dry the clothing.

 

 

Sensor pads and thermostats can not always tell whether clothing is dry or not. Shoes, comforters, stuffed pillows and toys, ect can appear dry while still damp.

 

 

130 minute dry cycles were built and were actually useful. Misguided energy regs, knee jerk ligation and people being aggressively stupid are what lead to the infantalization of appliances. You can't even boil water or sear steak on modern burners.
 
Chet are your a retired engineer?

How else would you have time to come up with these concerns?  Maybe you should look into getting more fiber in your diet too.  

 

So far, you have not answered Freddie Mercury and WHYYYYYYY!!!!?!?!

 

Often when comforters come out slightly damp from the dryer, I place them over the living room sofa and they dry completely by the next day.
 
130 minute dry times

The only reason older dryers could be run for over two hours some up to almost 3 was because they were designed to be hooked up to 120 V for people who couldn't afford the wiring or didn't have 240 V in their house.

No full-size washer dryer pair in the United States ever was designed to run two hours to dry normal loads when it was hooked to the proper voltage or gas, this is a by gone idea that nobody wants and people buying new appliances would not tolerate today. Things like shoes should not go in a dryer. I couldn't imagine what your shoes would look like if you let them tumble in the dryer for two hours, I wash shoes every month and I just set them in front of the grill of my refrigerator, where the warm air blows out and their bone dry overnight, there's many other ways to dry shoes as well without destroying them or running a 6000 W dryer for hours.

New ranges have as hot or hotter, burners, broilers, than ever before. There is no problem getting things grilled baked, etc. Gas ranges have up to 20,000 BTU burners back in the good old days. You were lucky to get to 12, many electric smooth top ranges have 3000 W elements and of course induction ranges are faster than anything ever built so I'm not sure where you're getting that silly idea that you can't cook anymore on new stoves.

Why aren't you working in the industry if you're so interested rather than just sitting at home dreaming of this nonsense all the time?

John L
 
Of Course!

Absolutely. Older dryer were designed and listed for 120 volt adaptation if 240 volts was not available. That is indeed the reason why 90 minute timed dryer cycles had an extra 40+ minutes added to them.  

 

 

 

8fb24096b7c4e3cce1c693cca90453beec7b0cae614318e876e8fba42f832342.png


 

 

However, that doesn't change the fact full size dryers of the past not intended for 120 volt operation still offered a 90 or 100 minute timed dry cycle. Without switching to low heat mid-way through. And without a 10+ minute cool down. Because 70 minutes of  soft heat permanent press treatment was not enough. I highly doubt any customer would consciously refuse to buy a dryer because it offered 90 minutes of unadulterated timed dry.

 

 

Shoes work well with towels and even tennis balls thrown in. Shoes can be dried on a rack that goes inside the dryer, as offered by Kenmore back in the day. Nothing gets damaged or worn out.

 

 

Burners- of course they are more powerful than ever. Until silly UL mandated burner thermostats which prevent people from being able to cook. A very small percentage of people whom were being negligent started grease fires, so the solution was adding thermostats that cutout the burner.

 

They work so well, that people are actively bypassing them:

 


 

Read the Youtube reviews if you want an accurate, real world account of what people are experiencing with sensi temp burners:

 



 

 

I've been cooking myself for over 30 years including weekly frying, even when sick or exhausted, and I have never had a grease fire let alone left heating oil unattended. Or kept adding heat the few times oil went above its smoke point.

 

In other words, the majority of people are punished for the negligent actions of a few. Cost of living increases to cover the cost of new rules which aid or help nobody at the bottom. A concept that goes against freedom, liberty and democracy. 

 

 

 I am a US citizen with inalienable human rights and a consumer.

 

 

[this post was last edited: 2/4/2025-09:50]

 

Latest posts

Back
Top