John-- Thanks for the clarification about the device on the end of the drain hose. I thought the geyser coming from the other standpipe was caused by the SQ's standpipe being air or water-tight.
I sprayed the tub with Goo-Gone, let it sit for a few minutes, then scrubbed it out with bar mops. That seems to have taken care of the polishing compound issue.
Now I have to figure out what, if anything, can be done about the water backing up out of the standpipe. I suppose I should hope it's a partial blockage that can be snaked out by the plumber. If not, the only solution I've been able to come up with is to get a laundry tub for the washer to drain into. The laundry tub would then have to be hard-plumbed into the system. Seems like a lot of fuss over a top-loader that will not be the daily driver.
Have to say I do like the SQ. It has all the familiarities of top-loaders produced before my hairline began to recede. It definitely uses a lot of water, particularly hot water. I washed three loads of whites last night (one of them being a rewash of the first load) and my water heater was in continuous fire-up mode trying to keep up. It doesn't extract as much water from a load, which means more time in the dryer.
The rational side of me realizes that a load can be washed in hot water in the front-loader using half the water the SQ does, with equally good results. And it spins faster to reduce drying time for loads of towels, kitchen & personal whites, and bed linens. I can add the (faux) steam option to provide an extended hot 1st rinse and a warm final rinse using a fraction of the hot water needed by the SQ for a hot wash/cold rinse (albeit with double the cycle time).
I'm used to the Frigidaire taking 38-50 minutes for a normal load, 60 minutes with steam option, 72 minutes with allergy option (wash temp boost to 131 degrees) and 1 hour 36 minutes for a profile wash using the Sanitize cycle (gradual wash temp boost to 150 degrees). The longer cycle times don't bother me. A cycle time of 40 minutes (10 minutes longer than SQ) is made up by time saved in the dryer. A very large load that would have to be split into 2 loads for the SQ would probably come out in favor of the front-loader, as well, considering there would have to be two wash and two dry cycles with the top-loader. In all other scenarios, the SQ definitely wins in the time-saving department.
I'm going to run a few side-by-side comparison loads with the front-loader. The front-loader will probably take the checkered flag on a number of points, but I don't want to assume too much.
Were I to have only one washer--and if it had to be a top-loader-- SQ would be the machine of choice.
Now, if I can just keep it from flooding my laundry room, LOL![this post was last edited: 10/10/2013-12:27]