davetranter
Well-known member
A bit more on Exchange power arrangements
'Wayupnorth' (Reply#31) mentions DC gensets. I think all of ours had been replaced before I took an interest in power arrangements. Before the development of high current silicon rectifiers, some exchanges had large motor-generator sets, while smaller ones had Mercury Arc Rectifiers. In my day, all gensets were AC, and ran the entire building, including 'domestic' power, heating and lighting. There was always at least one 'redundant' transformer/rectifier unit (just known as a 'Rectifier' in G.P.O. speak) to provide for routine maintenance downtime or emergency. Rectifiers varied in size from a few tens of Amperes in small exchanges to a row of 2000A cubicles in large buildings. These (mostly made by G.E.C.) were very reliable. At one local exchange (due (I'm assuming) to a miniscule difference in output voltage) one 600A rectifier cubicle ran 'flat out' at 600A for 12 hours per day (the second rectifier would switch in as the load increased just after 8am, and would switch out again sometime mid-evening) and ran all of the evening/night load (about 350A) as well. This situation went on for many years, and was still the case when I left the company. We never had any trouble with it. The exchange staff loved it because they could dry wet clothes in Winter, simply by throwing them on top of the cubicle for an hour or so, it was MUCH warmer than our 'restricted by Government Regulations' heating system, which hardly ever came on!!
There was (of course) a third (redundant) rectifier, which I NEVER saw in operation. This was a typical G.P.O. setup. the maximum demand of the exchange was probably 1000A, so it was equipped with three 600A rectifiers. I think I have the spec of the diesel set for that exchange somewhere, but it will take a while to find....
Hope I haven't bored too many people too much ;-)
All best
Dave T
P.S. The control and telemetry systems for the exchange power systems was deliberately kept 'low-tech'. It was mainly resistors, capacitors, and relays, with a bare minimum of semiconductors. This provided 'reliable' central monitoring capability for use in case of 'national emergencies' etc.
'Wayupnorth' (Reply#31) mentions DC gensets. I think all of ours had been replaced before I took an interest in power arrangements. Before the development of high current silicon rectifiers, some exchanges had large motor-generator sets, while smaller ones had Mercury Arc Rectifiers. In my day, all gensets were AC, and ran the entire building, including 'domestic' power, heating and lighting. There was always at least one 'redundant' transformer/rectifier unit (just known as a 'Rectifier' in G.P.O. speak) to provide for routine maintenance downtime or emergency. Rectifiers varied in size from a few tens of Amperes in small exchanges to a row of 2000A cubicles in large buildings. These (mostly made by G.E.C.) were very reliable. At one local exchange (due (I'm assuming) to a miniscule difference in output voltage) one 600A rectifier cubicle ran 'flat out' at 600A for 12 hours per day (the second rectifier would switch in as the load increased just after 8am, and would switch out again sometime mid-evening) and ran all of the evening/night load (about 350A) as well. This situation went on for many years, and was still the case when I left the company. We never had any trouble with it. The exchange staff loved it because they could dry wet clothes in Winter, simply by throwing them on top of the cubicle for an hour or so, it was MUCH warmer than our 'restricted by Government Regulations' heating system, which hardly ever came on!!
There was (of course) a third (redundant) rectifier, which I NEVER saw in operation. This was a typical G.P.O. setup. the maximum demand of the exchange was probably 1000A, so it was equipped with three 600A rectifiers. I think I have the spec of the diesel set for that exchange somewhere, but it will take a while to find....
Hope I haven't bored too many people too much ;-)
All best
Dave T
P.S. The control and telemetry systems for the exchange power systems was deliberately kept 'low-tech'. It was mainly resistors, capacitors, and relays, with a bare minimum of semiconductors. This provided 'reliable' central monitoring capability for use in case of 'national emergencies' etc.