arbilab
Well-known member
We've had "Pepsi Throwback" with real sugar (and Mtn Dew too) for several years without any promise they were 'permanent'. Well, in marketing NOTHING is permanent. I've asked them. But Pepsi appears a regular passenger now on the 'no HFCS' express.
They have repackaged sugar Pepsi without the 'throwback' reference. Like it's no longer an experiment. The new packaging does say 'real sugar' but not 'throwback'. If you're used to looking for the 'throwback' version you'll have to adjust your shelf scan. Look for the oldstyle script logo.
Pepsi has also introduced two new 'real sugar' flavors, vanilla and cherry. I know it's real because I just saw a commercial for it. I looked for them last time I replenished but ours still had HFCS. No sale.
I asked Coke about the HFCS issue too. Their response, almost verbatim: "Thank you for your interest in CocaCola products. All our products are flavored the same...." Oh yeah? Then why does Mexican Coke taste like Coke when I was a kid and US Coke taste like drain cleaner? I asked them that too. No reply. Not even a coupon for what I wouldn't drink if it was free.
Oh, FOUNTAIN Coke, like at fastfood places? That IS sugar Coke. At Whataburger 2 weeks ago, their carbonation unit froze up. I dispensed from the fountain; it tasted right but was somewhat flat. They replaced it from a 2-liter bottle of STORE Coke. Blecch! Drain cleaner.
What drew soda mfrs to HFCS? The latest in a long line of "Sugar Protection Acts". Jiminy Carter signed it. Made it illegal to import sugar. Turned most Caribbean economies into drug cartels and turned US soda into drain cleaner.
JC didn't write it and probably didn't even know what it would do. Lobbyists for Monsanto, Corn Growers Assn, and corn processors like ArcherDanielsMidland did. HFCS became cheaper by volume than sucrose, and it's sweeter by volume so they can use less. What corporation could resist that double seduction?
Well Pepsi did, and they're grabbing market share in doing so. For flavor and health reasons, more and more people are rejecting HFCS. Seems the 'sweetness index' is not all that sweeteners do for soda. You can even SMELL the difference between Mexican (or Euro) Coke and US Coke. One smells like a sugary treat. The other smells like...... drain cleaner.
BTW, Pepsi sugar products are priced identically with their HFCS and chemical sweetener lines. Whereas Mexican Coke and sugar DrPepper (where available) cost between 8.3 and 16 cents per ounce, sugar Pepsi costs 2.1 cents per ounce.
They have repackaged sugar Pepsi without the 'throwback' reference. Like it's no longer an experiment. The new packaging does say 'real sugar' but not 'throwback'. If you're used to looking for the 'throwback' version you'll have to adjust your shelf scan. Look for the oldstyle script logo.
Pepsi has also introduced two new 'real sugar' flavors, vanilla and cherry. I know it's real because I just saw a commercial for it. I looked for them last time I replenished but ours still had HFCS. No sale.
I asked Coke about the HFCS issue too. Their response, almost verbatim: "Thank you for your interest in CocaCola products. All our products are flavored the same...." Oh yeah? Then why does Mexican Coke taste like Coke when I was a kid and US Coke taste like drain cleaner? I asked them that too. No reply. Not even a coupon for what I wouldn't drink if it was free.
Oh, FOUNTAIN Coke, like at fastfood places? That IS sugar Coke. At Whataburger 2 weeks ago, their carbonation unit froze up. I dispensed from the fountain; it tasted right but was somewhat flat. They replaced it from a 2-liter bottle of STORE Coke. Blecch! Drain cleaner.
What drew soda mfrs to HFCS? The latest in a long line of "Sugar Protection Acts". Jiminy Carter signed it. Made it illegal to import sugar. Turned most Caribbean economies into drug cartels and turned US soda into drain cleaner.
JC didn't write it and probably didn't even know what it would do. Lobbyists for Monsanto, Corn Growers Assn, and corn processors like ArcherDanielsMidland did. HFCS became cheaper by volume than sucrose, and it's sweeter by volume so they can use less. What corporation could resist that double seduction?
Well Pepsi did, and they're grabbing market share in doing so. For flavor and health reasons, more and more people are rejecting HFCS. Seems the 'sweetness index' is not all that sweeteners do for soda. You can even SMELL the difference between Mexican (or Euro) Coke and US Coke. One smells like a sugary treat. The other smells like...... drain cleaner.
BTW, Pepsi sugar products are priced identically with their HFCS and chemical sweetener lines. Whereas Mexican Coke and sugar DrPepper (where available) cost between 8.3 and 16 cents per ounce, sugar Pepsi costs 2.1 cents per ounce.