Slow Cookers

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

1970's brings three things to mind

Stagflation, the "Earth" movement, the economy, and high energy prices.

As a child then one had little direct worry about such things. I mean one heard about them on the news, but since one didn't actually have to work/pay bills....

Yes, there was a "return to nature/basics" movement in the 1970's; but our Dad wasn't having any of that "Hippy-Dippy" nonsense in his house either. Closest we got was that horrible Quaker "natural" cereal an aunt either purchased for us or got our mother to buy. It was like eating cardboard with milk..... We kids did try to mount a protest, but that was something else that didn't fly in Big Daddy's house. *LOL*

Now a pressure cooker our Mother did have; it was from Presto IIRC and got used often.
 
Oh you kids!  You've given me a laugh.  My parents got married in Jan. 1946.  One of their gifts was an "EverHot" pot.  Yes, an early SC.  It was yellow with a black interior and a tin lid.  There were 3 prongs in the side of the pot with a swinging kind of gate.  Low was prongs 1 & 2, for high you swung the gate over against prong one and plugged the cord into 2 & 3.  She made lots of baked beans in that pot.  It was one of only 4 countertop appliances she ever had.  The others were her Kenmore waffle maker, GE electric skillet, toaster and Hamilton Beach mixer.  All of them were still there and working when we moved her to a care facility in 1990.  The HB I still have in a special place.  Of note, too is that my Grandmother Bushman dies in 1973, leaving Gramps alone.  We got him a SC for Christmas that year and it was one of the most favorite gifts ever!   It's the one I used today.  Ugly orange with a permanent liner, but it's still a keeper!  Greg
 
Growing up my mother had 2 slow cookers, a 3.5 qt Rival and a 4 qt rectangular West Bend
She used them fairly often for spaghetti sauce, chili, barbecued ham, roast beef, pork and sauerkraut

Both were wedding gifts in 1984

xraytech-2016120421372002294_1.jpg

xraytech-2016120421372002294_2.jpg
 
I limited myself to removable inserts until I saw this thing and had to have it.  Since I didn't have a SC smaller than 6-quarts, that justified the purchase.

rp2813-2016120422405200333_1.jpg
 
Can't Live Without My Crock Pot

My Crock Pot (an electric six-quart with electronic controls) is an indispensable part of my kitchen. The other night, I made a delicious pot roast; and cooked potatoes for mashing on Thanksgiving. The Crock Pot also makes my partner happy. On the days when there's a WWE pay-per-view event, I cook up a big batch of chili. With raw onions (and the sautéed onions I add to the chili itself, along with saltine crackers, Kevin watches his favorite wrestlers fight to the finish with a tasty meal. I'm not a big wrestling fan, but count me as a slow cooker booster!
 
I picked up a similar Sunbeam item a while back, but I don't think it was ever intended to be used for deep frying.  It has a single handle and of course lacks a removable insert.  Since the liner is aluminum, there may be issues with acidic ingredients.  I bought it for jobs that a 6-quart Nesco is too big for, but I've yet to find a reason to use it for anything, so it may get re-homed at some point.
 
there may be issues with acidic ingredients

I have heard some argue that any metal pan will react to some degree. Someone here said he could detect a slight different between stainless steel and ceramic or enameled iron. IIRC. Thus the non-reactive slow cookers might be appealing, at least for some, particularly for something that has long simmering time.
 
Wait, I told a lie.

Actually do have a slow cooker, well at least in theory.

Mother Dear gave me a Dazey combination deep fryer/slow cooker as a Christmas gift one of the first years after moving out. Didn't come with the ceramic liner, and one hasn't used the deep fryer in ages so totally forgot about the thing.

Apparently they are now highly collectible and sought after.

 
I just learned a few days ago that one should not prepare kidney beans in a crock pot without boiling them on the stovetop for a few minutes first....apparently they have a toxin that's deactivated by the boiling water!

I have 3 crock pots myself...my mother's old 1970's red round Rival crockpot with non-removable liner, a newer round one with removable liner and one large oval one with removable liner (I roast a ham in it sometimes...so tender).

I've seen recipes for cakes "baked" in the crock pot.
 
Crock Pots

I currently have 3 slow cookers. Next to my coffee maker, they are the most used small appliance in my kitchen.

I have made cakes in the slow cooker, but they are the 'Lava' variety. Spooned into a bowl with a scoop of ice cream and eaten hot. Hardest part is smelling it while waiting for it.

Malcolm
 
I use my crock pots a lot. I have about 15 of them, most being vintage Rival models. I have a few newer ones like a 4 qt All Clad and the Ninja slow cooker.
I also have 4 NIB Rival models
My favorite to use is the Rival with the 3qt Corningware liner
 
Some years ago a friend raved about buying a small slow cooker on sale and that it was perfect for single serve meals.

 

So I went to the local kmart/walmart/target and got a 1.5 liter model. It sat in hte original box for years. But last Sunday I decided to give it a try, at last. Instructions said to break it in by adding a couple cups of water and setting it on high for 15 minutes. Well, it was more like an hour and by that time the thing was boiling briskly. Tag on unit says it consumes 120 watts, no doubt on high. Which is probably a lot for such a small pot.

 

Anyway, I added some chopped onion, cubed potatoes, carrots, cubed chuck steak, soup stock, and herbs. Set on low, went off to a car meet and came back three hours later. It smelled great. But the instructions said to cook for 8-10 hours. Well by that time the aroma had dissipated and while the results were edible they had lost a lot of flavor. The next day I cut up the rest of the chuck steak and tried again, leaving it on for "only" five hours. Contents simmering by then. Results better. But I think it tends to run hot, even on low, so I will try shorter cook times to see what works best. Possible using larger chunks of meat would help, as well.

 

I'm giving it a break for a bit, but might try some pork instead of beef next time.

 

I figure slow cooker manufacturers make these things run hotter than necessary because of the very concerns about food poisoning mentioned earlier. A programmable unit might help with timing. Your mileage may vary.
 
I have steamed many solid puddings in my crockpot, which is a modern Rival 6½ quart, SCVT650-PS. 

 

I don’t use a trivet; I fold a little napkin and put that in the bottom.  Then I boil some water in the tea kettle, add a few inches to the crock, and turn it on high. 

 

While the crockpot heats up, I prep the basin, add the batter, tie it down, etc.  Then the basin goes into the crock, I top it up to the correct level with some more boiling water and leave it to steam on high for 5 hours.

 

I use a 2 pint (US) / 1½ pint (Imperial) basin, which fits just fine in my crockpot.  Also, because the crock is large, there is plenty of water.  I think a small crock would cool down too much when the pudding went in.

 

The modern Rival definitely BOILS, so there’s no reason to fear a raw pudding.  I do start with boiling water, because I don’t want or need a slow rise in temperature.

 

I was surprised to read in this post that older models stayed at lower temperatures, and I now understand why some of my old recipes are not as good in this new model.  Some dishes really need to stay around 190°F, and apparently that is not going to happen in any modern crockpot.  I’m off to eBay again!!

[this post was last edited: 12/6/2016-11:46]
 
Rich,

I've noticed that lots of recipes are written by idiots. At 120 watts for 1.5 liter, there's no way it needs 8 hours.

Sheesh.

One thing which has often been mentioned - lifting the lid takes away an awful lot of heat and it does add to the final cooking time.

I participated in an online review of pressure pans a few years back. Very professional, very exacting - cooked several 'high-altitude' variations on recipes. Unfortunately, the ultimate article - and this is still online and it's a major player in the review business, print and online - was edited at the last minute to make these two changes:

1) It takes 1.5 hours at 15 PSI at sealevel to cook a fresh chicken. Or make a simple soup. Or stew. When I and everybody else complained, we were informed that this was drawn from the FDA guidelines. Which is total nonsense. Stupid times are still up.

2) Because oil under pressure goes way up to a very high temp very fast, all manufacturers council against using normal pressure cookers for pressure frying. So, idiot editor dumbed down every recipe which used more than two tablespoons (aggregate!) of fat or oil. She insisted upon our repeated complaints that this was a safety rule of the manufacturers.

 

In short, they spent a lot of money, invested a lot of time, got some great recipes and testers and devices...and then absolutely destroyed the finished online review by letting editors who wouldn't know a pressure pan from a slow cooker 'correct' our work.

 

I've had kidney beans turn out (and yes, they had boiled) in five hours at our altitude in our 1957 bean pot. Without presoaking. Follow your nose and throw away the stupid instructions. Cook with a thermometer.
 
FDA = LCD (lowest common denominator)

 

They really are under an obligation to tailor all instructions to the most stupid consumer they can find.  No “if ... then” clauses, no exceptions, no variations.  They always choose the most extreme end of possible outcomes, simply because they have to.  If there is even the tiniest possibility that just one or two people are too daft to understand the information, then the entire presentation has to come down to their level.

 

What angers me is that the FDA ends up giving scientifically false information, particularly when they do not acknowledge the ambiguous or inconclusive nature of many of the studies they rely on.  Guidelines on salt are a good example.  Dietary cholesterol is another.  Animal-produced, i.e. naturally occurring, trans-fats (which are not even the same as artificial trans-fats) are another.  The list is long.
 
John,

You sure got that one right.

Our protests - all 18 of us testers - that 1.5 hours for a soup was absurd fell on deaf ears. The idiot editor had never used a pressure cooker, hadn't a clue and wasn't going to let reality stand in the way of her certainties.

So - useless review, hurt the reputation of the organization and resulted in all 18 of us refusing to ever work with them again.

And then people wonder why Trump was able to create his own reality. After that project, I know exactly why.
 
Jewish History of the Crock Pot

From the Washington Jewish Week 2-9-17:

 

"Slow cookers have a Jewish origin. Their inventor, Irving Naxon, grew up listening to his mother tell stories about cholent, a bean-based Sabbath stew that cook all day, a traditional dish among Jews from central and Eastern Europe.

 

Every Friday evening, the Jewish women in his mother's Lithuanian village assembled meat, potatoes, vegetables and beans in heavy pots and brought them to the bakery. As the oven was turned off for the Sabbath, the pots were placed inside so they could simmer in the waning heat and provide a warm meal the following night.

 

In 1936, Naxon aplied for a patent for a food-heating machine featuring an insert that distributed heat evenly. By 1940, he received a patent and named his machine the Naxon Beanery. In the 1970s, he sold his patent to Rival Manufacturing, which marketed it as the Crock Pot--and the rest is history."

 

Has anyone ever seen a Naxon Beanery?

 

A baker's oven was not turned off. It was not fueled during the Sabbath, but did not cool much in those 25 hours because people expected bread on Sunday so baking began after the Sabbath ended on Saturday night.

 

 Bakers working at night are said to have heard the tunneling invaders and reported the noise, saving the city of either  Buda (later Budapest) or Vienna from Turks tunneling under the walls.  The baker made the victory pastries in the shape of the Islamic Crescent and thus Croissants were born:

 

<h3><span id="Origin_stories" class="mw-headline">Origin stories</span></h3>
Stories of how the Kipferl — and so, ultimately, the croissant — was created are widespread and persistent culinary legends, going back to the 19th century.<sup id="cite_ref-schimmer_12-0" class="reference">[12]</sup> However, there are no contemporary sources for any of these stories, and an aristocratic writer, writing in 1799, does not mention the Kipferl in a long and extensive list of breakfast foods.<sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference">[13]</sup>

The legends include tales that it was invented in Europe to celebrate the defeat of the Umayyad forces by the Franks at the Battle of Tours in 732, with the shape representing the Islamic crescent; that it was invented in Buda; or, according to other sources, in Vienna in 1683 to celebrate the defeat of the Ottomans by Christian forces in the siege of the city, as a reference to the crescents on the Ottoman flags, when bakers staying up all night heard the tunneling operation and gave the alarm.<sup id="cite_ref-schimmer_12-1" class="reference">[12]</sup>

The above-mentioned Alan Davidson proposed that the Islamic origin story originated with 20th-century writer Alfred Gottschalk, who gave two versions, one in the Larousse Gastronomique and the other in his History of Food and Gastronomy:<sup id="cite_ref-Gottschalk1948_14-0" class="reference">[14]</sup>

<blockquote class="templatequote">
According to one of a group of similar legends, which vary only in detail, a baker of the 17th century, working through the night at a time when his city (either Vienna in 1683 or Budapest in 1686) was under siege by the Turks, heard faint underground rumbling sounds which, on investigation, proved to be caused by a Turkish attempt to invade the city by tunnelling under the walls. The tunnel was blown up. The baker asked no reward other than the exclusive right to bake crescent-shaped pastries commemorating the incident, the crescent being the symbol of Islam. He was duly rewarded in this way, and the croissant was born. The story seems to owe its origin, or at least its wide diffusion, to Alfred Gottschalk, who wrote about the croissant for the first edition [1938] of the Larousse Gastronomique and there gave the legend in the Turkish attack on Budapest in 1686 version; but on the history of food, opted for the 'siege of Vienna in 1683' version.<sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference">[15]</sup>

<cite>— Alan Davidson, Oxford Companion to Food</cite>

</blockquote>
This has led to croissants being banned by some Islamic fundamentalists.<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference">[16]</sup>
 
Interesting account of the birth of the slow cooker small appliance. Never heard of Naxon before. The idea that leaving a crock in the bakery oven which is not re-fueled on the Sabbath is interesting: a way to honor the laws against lighting a fire on the Sabbath and having a hot meal at the end of the day. I do remember slow cookers becoming something of a rage in the '70's, although it took me a long time to "get with it" and acquire my own in the late 90's. That one I still have; it's an oval Rival with a green crock. I had this idea that the size would accommodate a whole chicken. But I was never all that impressed with the result. More like boiled chicken. OK for a sort of chicken stew, I guess.

One thing about slow cookers is a bit of a concern. And that is the amount of time that the raw food sits in the cooker before the temp goes from room temp to a safer 120F and above. I suppose that would be called the danger zone. I suppose some modern cookers allow one to program them for high for the first few hours and then switch to low. The Hamilton Beach I have now has a temp probe, which is very nice, as it will switch automatically to "Warm" when the target probe temp is reached, but it doesn't to the programmed high-low switch, at least not in temp probe mode.
 
I use mine

Which is a ancient Rival I found new in the box at a estate sale,very often,for a roast, I use about a 3 pound chuck roast, spray the cooker with Pam, salt and pepper the meat, put it in the cooker, add a couple of garlic cloves, a sprig or 2 of Rosemary, and slice a onion on top, turn on low, cover it and cook at least 8 to 12 hours, no liquid added and when done you have plenty of broth, I also use mine to make apple butter which is the best I ever tasted.I will hunt up the recipe and post it, I use it for chili,spaghetti sauce,and lots of other things.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top