Slow, long stroke agitation versus short, fast stroke

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Marky_Mark

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
690
Location
Living in Palm Springs and Madrid. From Liverpool.
I know most of us prefer the traditional long, slower stroke agitation.  But why?  Is this preference mostly due to nostalgic reasons or does the slower, longer stroke wash better and more gently etc?

 

Whirlpool direct drives can be shreadmores if not used wisely.

But what about others like Maytag?

[this post was last edited: 1/1/2021-11:20]
 
@marky-mark

Have you not seen a Servis washer that has the long slow stroke it stirs up a lot of current, Compare it to the Hotpoint which has a shorter faster stroke that washes in a totally different way it still stirs up the water but it makes the clothes go back and forth where as the service moves them all around the tub.

Austin
 
Long Stroke Vs Shorter Stroke Agitation

Hi Mark, Either type has worked well in different washer and agitator designs.

 

The LS in BD WP built Washers was never really a problem for example due to good agitator designs.

 

Likewise the SS agitation of Frigidaire pulsator agitation, GE FF washers, Philco washers of the 60s and of course WP DD washers of the larger capacity design generally worked well.

 

Maytag offers a good comparison because they used two different transmission designs in the same washer design.

 

The BIG problem with MT LS washers was the two different agitators used were ill designed for such a narrow tub, the original bakelite and the Power-Finn both will grab clothing and just repeatedly drag the item back and forth through the water, this is especially pronounced with high speed agitation on lower water levels.

[ Note MT sold more 1 speed washers than about anyone else ]

 

In the 1970s CRs decided to test the premise of whether consumers needed to buy a 2 speed washer or whether a 1 speed machine was adequate. To test they bough all the leading US washers in their basic 1 speed versions and washed sheer curtains in the machines, ONLY the MT with a PF agitator ruined in one washing the sheer curtain panels, not even the very aggressive agitation of a 1 speed Norge damaged the curtain panels.

 

The best thing MT ever did to the DC washer line was the Two-Way Load Sensor with the faster shorter stroke agitation, I was still working around my friends that had a Maytag Store and they said that virtually all the complaints about clothing damage went away after  the LSA became standard in the domestic lineup.

 

John 
 
Currently have the best of both worlds. I was faced with only keeping 1 of the washers for a moment but ended up keeping both. 1 short/fast and 1 long/slow. I actually like the short/fast a bit better. Both work, seem to wash ok, spin is the same of course. I have found that the short/fast seems to roll a larger load just a tad bit better.

super32-2021010118332001254_1.jpg
 
IMHO

If Maytag could have found a way to produce same results using agitator from wringer washers and that square tub in automatics, they would have cornered the market.

When properly loaded even large items like sheets move down and around by powerful currents of water. This instead of merely being dragged about bottom of tub.
 
Perfectly happy with the washing action and turn over in my ‘63 RCA Whirlpool Imperial Mark XII washer. When slightly under loaded, it manages to turn the load over at least 10 to 12 times a minute and I counted how many times the red t-shirt turned over, it turned over at least 12 times.

 
I loved that video of your RCA.  I should make a sound loop and sleep to it for therapy .What a  great machine.

 

What about guys like me who have jeans and heavy wear fabrics? My Maytag may beat the clothing,as you say, but cleaning the grease from my jeans is imperative. I'll take the beating instead of the massaging as I haven't the time to treat,brush and scrub before washing.
 
actually if Maytag gave their automatics the same belt drive as the wringers, they would have won hands down....

but that slipping clutch/belt is the true reason behind the cut-all-power lid switch, it wasn't about safety....it was so people switching from a wringer could not see the sluggish wash action pf the automatic compared to the wringer....which they thought they were getting...

standard size tubs which formed an "O" offered better turnover...versus the oval taller shape of the larger capacity...if the tub for the larger capacity was made equally taller and wider, and the agitators size compensated as well, they wouldn't have had the issues that they did...

this is where the Load Sensor helped out a lot....

the 50hz pulley upgrade is a nice touch for the pitman trans, a kick up in action these machines always needed...
 
Martin,

 

         So the world should have ceased washer technical advancement at the wringer? Was the the Maytag automatic a step down? I don't understand.

 

 Maytag engineer's couldn't figure this out also?

 

It's a washing machine
 
50 Hz Motor Pulleys

Hi John, Would a 50Hz pulley shorten the life of a motor ?

 

It would be very unlikely to do much to the motor, the two things that are likely to ruin an older washer motor at this point are lubrication failures and moisture damage that degrades the motor windings, within reason working a motor a little harder does not do any real harm.

 

John L.
 
I've been running a 1972 Maytag A606 long-stroke high capacity machine, with the stock pulley, for 16 years.  I have the lid switch by-passed for two reasons, I want to see what's going on, and I like to add bleach while it's agitating.

 

I find that the clothes get cleaner when the machine is loaded nice and full, turning the clothes over slowly.  When it's under-loaded and flipping the clothes over quickly, grease spots from my sloppy chef are sometimes left behind.  As far as anything made of a sheer fabric, such as silk long johns, I simply put them in a mesh laundry bag, and throw them in.  I have never witnessed the clothes "merely being dragged about the bottom of the tub".

 
 
 
Rapid-fire rollover on an underload situation reasonably doesn't clean as well as more leisurely rollover that provides items more time in the lower "action zone."

Some would chastise that this load of four jeans needs more water (and faster agitation) ... it does not.


Or, that this is an overload ... it's not.  Or should been on high speed ... maybe, but not necessary, although max 16 mins wash time could been done instead of 14 mins.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top