Speed Queen to offer heater option......on 'International export' F/L models

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support AutomaticWasher.org:

mayfan69

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
1,497
Location
Brisbane Queensland Australia
I asked Speed Queen if they were going to offer their TOL fully electronic top and front load washers and dryers in 220/240V export voltage and also if the F/L washer would come with a heater: this was their response via Facebook this morning:

 

'Yes, Speed Queen offers products in multiple voltage configurations for many global markets. The 2015 front load washer will be available with a heating option in select, international configurations'

 

They didn't mention if the US domestic model would be offered with this option as i didn't ask.

 

Cheers

Leon
 
Honest to God, I'd buy a front-loading Speed Queen in a heartbeat if it had more cycle flexibility and a water heater. There's a dealership within a stone's throw of my house, so repair work would not be an issue.

I agree, Bob; it's disappointing.
 
Cycle Flexability

has been answered by the new models. The heater has not been confirmed or denied at this point.

Malcolm
 
"The 2015 front load washer will be available with a heating option in select, international configurations"

 

Will these washers in question goint to be sold as "commercial" or "residential" units? I am wondering because we essentially have the same Speed Queen washers over here that are sold in the US. However, because our models are labeled "commercial", they can get away with using very powerful heaters (several thousand watts). I could well imagine that, as long as a model in the US is labeled "residential", it won't get a heater thanks to Energy Star, while the sister machine, labeled "commercial", will receive a heating element.
 
Heater

I would take one in a heartbeat! :D

I think the issue is that a US front loader with a heater would take to long. The most an American machine can pull is 1,800 watts, where a Euro model often has at least 2,300 watts available.

But that's not going to stop me from an international model ;)
 
My '04 Speed Queen washer has a heater, I bought it from Bob in Cleveland (as John mentioned above) and it's a great washer.  The Spot-B-Gone boosted hot cycle is running right now!

 

As far as flexibility, I really don't miss the many cycle options that I've had on other modern f/l washers.  The nine minute wash on Regular cycle is good for most loads and properly pre-treated problems come right out with a good HE detergent.

gansky1-2014121621471901953_1.jpg
 
American FL Washers With Heaters

The SQ FL Washers with heaters are 900 watts and do very well at heating the water to around 150F. You do not need thousands of watts of heat when you are starting with hot water, usually from a gas water heater in the US.

Generally North American laundry equipment is much more energy efficient that European home laundry appliances. In the US we generally use economical Gas Heated hot water instead of electricity and we often use Gas Vented clothes dryers that are light years ahead of using a condenser electric dryer in terms of operating costs not to mention how much less carbon dioxide is put in to the atmosphere using a gas dryer.

John L.
 
Personally.

Even a Speed Queen FL machine without a heater is still superior to residential machines offered at big box stores.

Malcolm
 
Simply no.

Nope. It isn't. There is no way US laundry is more efficent.
The most sold German washer configuration has 8kg (20 pounds roughly) capacity, is A+++ rated and highly water efficent (round about 70l for this load at 2 and a half hours). It uses about 0,8 kWh on a warm (104°F, 40°C) and about 1,2 kWh on a hot (140°F, 60°C) wash. On the "label cycles" (dumbed down temperatures, looooooong washtimes up to 4 hours and poor rinsing) such washers only use 50l and about 0,5/0,7 kWh.
Some washers go down to 45l of water for the same load, cycle times of 6 hours and energy usage of about 0,4/0,5 kWh (reachin only 35°C/90°F or less on a hot wash).
The most sold dryer is heat-pump by now, rated A++. It runs round about 2 hours and only uses 2 kWh.
Some more efficent dryers might take 2,5 or 3 hours, yet only use 1,5 to 1,3 kWh.
I doubt you beat less than 3,5 kWh for 20 pounds of laundry, washed hot and dried within 4-5 hours time.
Or a top efficency pair takeing 10h for 20 pounds, but only using 2 kWh or less.
 
OH....but they did answer the question..I don't expect any heater to be available to the USA.  We don't live in an international market. International... is code word for foreign.
 
Also from SQ's Facebook Page for the 2015 FL

The capacity will be 20% larger - taking it to 3.42 cu ft.

The temperature of the water is determined by your hot water heater. There's no mixing with the cold, unless you choose Warm then it's mixed with 50% Hot and 50% cold water.

There will be more cycle choices.

mr_b-2014121715305409171_1.jpg
 
I think some people are missing the point of a heater in FL washers.

The whole point of having heaters in FL machines is to allow a cooler intake temperature, such that heat-sensitive stains are less likely to be set into the items being washed. As the temperature increases, you get the benefits of a cool, warm and eventually hot wash cycle all in the one. Given the huge difference in temperature between cool and hot, it *is* necessary to use a reasonably large heater to ensure that cycle times are not absurdly long, particularly on European machines where there is the choice of temperatures exceeding 140º for the wash.

Suggesting that US products are better is more blind patriotism, I think, than truth. Others have supplied times, temperatures and actual energy consumption, while I'll make some rebuttals which are related, but not based upon these facts:
~ In many instances, Europeans LONG AGO abandoned hugely wasteful storage water heater solutions, whatever the fuel (unless solar/geothermal), you're still heating (in some cases) vast quantities of water that isn't used. So now, they are using instant electric or gas systems. Either way, their on-demand nature is far more efficient than storing water waiting for someone to eventually have a shower, or wash a load of laundry. Given high EU energy prices, this seems like a sensible idea.
I've noticed in some areas, storage systems do remain popular, for whatever reason. This includes Norway, one of the most expensive countries to live in (electric storage systems). Why don't they use gas when the state produced product is right there? Well, it is far easier to supply electricity in the middle of a mountain range than it is gas. Its less costly, and far safer if there is an accident. Same reason we use gas bottles 'in the sticks' here in Australia, too. Its also a cultural thing, no-one in Norway I've seen cooks with gas (unless its a camping stove). Everyone uses some sort of electric range/stovetop setup.

~ Given that Europeans don't have storage water heaters, and their washers use small quantities of water to get the job done - why waste hot water trying to fill the machines when the water (while hot) will be so little in quantity that it barely raises the overall temperature above tepid? The same applies for dishwashers. Unless there is a clear savings advantage, running hot water taps until they are purged of cold water can be wasteful.
This waste can be eliminated by allowing the washer to completely heat the water itself. And again, in the end, the cost of this over time will be less than wastefully keeping water hot un-necessarily, unless you are processing quantities of laundry meant for a commercial laundry, and not a home situation.

People here on this site have reported that they have to use their SQ FL's on 'Hot' for a (true) warm wash, and they must first "purge" the washer of cold water up to several times to ensure they get a true hot wash. Given the average person doing the laundry probably doesn't care about "the details," they'd try running the warm or hot cycle, only to be disappointed when it didn't turn out as they expected. The Euro machines at least understand this, and will heat to what you set them to. They don't give you a cold wash when "warm" is selected, they give the user what *they* want, when they want it - Even to a specific temperature setpoint!
Meanwhile, U.S. machines are still only offering temperature selections in the vague terms of "Cold, Warm, Hot, Extra Hot" - which are highly disputable temperature ranges.
 
American efficiency

As much as I love the way of life in the US, suggesting anything over there is more energy efficient is simply wrong. Europe is light years ahead on that score, in terms of appliances used, the way houses are heated and the cars we drive.

I love US top loading washers (I have 2 in the garage) however, the water they use to run a load is criminal.
 
Euro machines

I disagree. Euro machines fill with cold water, which requires a longer time or more wattage. Up in the north water is stone cold in the winter, so heating water from 40 degrees to 150 takes time. A 900 watt heater will work, but take time, a lot of time. Doubling or tripling the wattage cuts back on time. I know because I have experimented with 230 volt Euro models. It makes a difference.

Also, not all dryers are gas. An electric dryer is less efficient than a condenser. Even if you did have gas, consider that all vent dryers pull a large amount of air (cubic feet per minute) out of your home. So unless the outside air is equal to the inside air in temperature; your AC or heating system needs to work more to compensate when ever running a vent dryer. I fail to see the efficiency in that.
 
Should I Add?

While the EU plans on banning high-powered vacuum's was seen as sheer stupidity by many on this forum, I don't see the U.S. making such regulations.

Off-topic? Yes, probably. But does it counter the argument that the U.S. makes the most efficient products? Most certainly.
 
Vaccums

Id say on topic, a point well worth brining up :)

My understanding is that vacuum motors convert most energy to heat rather than HP. I think this has something to do with advertising wattage since a higher wattage might come across as more power. Easy give away: when one runs a vacuum cleaner the air that comes out the back is very warm, even hot.

Personally, keeping the HP but developing a more efficient motor (like a high frequency inverter motor) is a better option than limiting size or suction power.
 
I was just thinking at how maniacs are getting in the US compared to here in europe.
Believe me, they're getting eco paranoid.
Regarding the last matter of the vacuums though, the US doesn't do that because as noted the "crazy" wattage thing has been a typical european thing....and it was really time to give it a cut....it was one of those "all smoke-no roast" selling strategy things....
Regarding euro front loaders, I would like to point out some facts that may miss...
In many countries of europe they always came with cold fill only, and no...it wasn't because of the stain setting theory (which I never experienced) some members likes to tell, almost like saying it's made on purpose because of this, it isn't.. but that's simply because some countries had not proper hook ups in laundry areas..and that simply wasn't possible.
Infact thats a peculiarity of British machines to be double fill, britsh kept their machines in the kitchen, in the kitchen you always have had hot water..simple..
In other countries such as France, Germany, Italy, Spain not ...and you do get cold fill only....but it's full of people here who buy devices and or manually fill them hot and as hot as possible to save electric costs, not a case that the toploaders may them be agitator or the asian pulsator such as the LG are considered and sold as the most efficient and eco-saving machines, in this country and I know also elsewhere ....they wish they had all machines came with double fill now that many house have the possibility to have the hook ups and hot water is available nearly everywhere in modern houses made past 70s and 80s...
Built-in heaters in machines became a necessity because of what said before, just like it was even with the semi automatic agitatior machines that came before automatics, twin tub and or wringer washers.
See most of the EU twin tub and wringer washer machines with agitator, pulsator whatever settings....

Storage water heaters;
Actually I think that the fact of the storage water heaters is much more complicated than that..
Let's say Europe generally has never had a huge use of the tanks, not because of efficiency but simply because the living spaces in many countries of europe are much smaller, that means few would have space to fit a large water heater, so they had to switch to an insta one....
Buildings and homes in europe in the past didn't have centralized hot water piping and it was difficult to do so because most houses are brick houses and that meant a very expensive work to do, so that meant having to place a small insta water heater whenever needed, so one in the bathrrom feeding the sink and bathrub/shower and a small one in the kitchen... it's common to see bathrooms in older condos and or houses with a water heater on the top of the bathtub in each bathroom....gas lines ran and still runs now outside of houses and buildings, and they were much cheaper to set up versus a centralized hot water piping.
Add to it that as typical of many countries of europe, perhaps the most of population (at leas here, including Spain, France etc) lives in condos and the indipendent houses are things for "wealthy" folks, this is even more in medium to large towns and cities...
Yes, there were some tank heaters of course, both electric and gas, but they were so small... about 30-40 liters the bigger... bigger units couldn't cope with the small/limited living space and they were too small anyway, so they couldn't and wouldn't give satisfactory amount of hot water needed especially for family with kids, 1-2 quick showers and you already ran out of Hot water, so best option was to use instant ones that were small and made best use of space, and this is since the old days (In Russia is also the same even for buildings made after the 70s and 80s), that configuaration even by giving water less hot, made possible it would never "end"...
Always for the same reasons...
Modern instant gas heaters are small and made as compact as you can, though powerful ones and combi ones furnace+heater according to regulations should be to be kept outside, so there are models that with the same space use do both home heating and sanitary water, they can feed up to 7-8 radiators for home heating and provide sanitary water as hot as 80 degrees celsius...downsides is that they're easy to break and expensive to service.
They're certainly more energy efficient than a tank...though it was mainly because of space, gas in europe is cheap and gas reach virtually any-place, rural or not.

Norway: Norway is lucky, they got tons of cost-zero stuff to make energy with, and they've a government who really care of alternative energy, not just to make money out of eco/enviroinmental policies like others.... they've the stuff to do so and learned to use it...from the geysers to the fjords and tides etc...that means they can produce really cheap electricity, so they have electric tank heaters, and rely much on electrics, norvegians do have wood houses and I suppose the hot water thing in houses developped similarly to what it has been in the US, unlike the rest of europe.
Also in Norway there is not an high population density, most people lives in indipendent homes and decently sized, bigger spaces-larger homes...no problem to fit in a large tank heater....[this post was last edited: 12/18/2014-03:58]
 
Actually the universal motors in vacuum cleaners are VERY efficient-better than 80%.This ban is actually based on misunderstanding---politicians aren't techical folks-they do not know how motors and other electric and electronic things work.The motor in your vacuum is underloaded-so its drawing less power than what the nameplate may indicate.The nameplate rating is based upon the motor being tested in the labratory.The motor is powered and loaded to a condition where it can operate continuously without overheating.A universal type motor in say a power tool is loaded more heavily than your vacuum cleaner.The tool motor has to turn a drill bit or saw blade thru material-this is harder than turning a vacuum cleaner fan.Same if the universal motor is in say a kitchen machine like a mixer.Another thing the vacuum maker used the higher rating on the motor to give the customer the illusion the machine is more powerful.The vacuum cleaner performance is really depends on the DESIGN of the machine rather than the power of the motor.Ban should be thrown out.Too many variables here-and politicans aren't qualified to make techinical decisions.The series type-universal motor is used in many appliances besidces vacuum cleaners.It is one of the most common motors we use next to induction motors.And probably will be for some time-both universal and induction motors are well known,made,and inexpensive.
 
Freddy:

Norway has only two geysers and they are not on the main land, but on Spitsbergen, an island far north from the main land, in the Arctic sea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hot_springs

Vacuums, efficiency etc:

Already in another thread I told about my high efficient vacuum. It's the best I ever had on all aspects, including suction power. The rants about these vacuums will stop as soon as people have experienced themselves. I wonder sometimes how many people put blunt statements on this website about appliances without any experience with them. That includes the statement about American appliances being more efficient than European.
 
Yup... you're right! Obviously I confused with wind power.
Anyway...that doesn't change the sense...thanks for pointing that out for sake of correctness though!
According to Wikipedia:
"Of the total production in 2011 of 128 TWh, 122 TWh was from hydroelectric* plants, 4795 GWh was from thermal power, and 1283 GWh was wind generated."

*fjords
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_Norway
[this post was last edited: 12/19/2014-09:38]
 
We have a two year old Miele vacuum. It is one of the GreenLine models (S5, to be exactly). Two years ago, 1300W weren't much!
But even though, we only run it 900W (Eco&#92Silence setting) all the time and still get the same results.
Same with Evo-cycles on washers: If programmed well, they can be really good. They don't have to be, but certanly can.
 
Henene...
I have a 60s CGE vacuum cleaner that I use as my daily driver, that of watts pulls 450-500 (tag says 450) it's the most silent vacuum I've ever seen!
And yes it do the same job and has the same suction of the other Bosch vacumm I have (and I still keep in the closet for some reasons, I should dump it now that I think of it) that pulls 1000-1100 watts.....
The CGE does all what I need it to do....I really wouldn't need a stronger suction than that.
I cannot imagine if my CGE pulled as much as 1300 or more then I'd have a jet....
By having to do with vintage stuff, i could well see that vacuums as well other small apliances involved in the past but modern "watts craze" thing, could be made using less and providing same results, vintage small appliances were the proof... it was clear to me already that this thing of watts was just part of a selling strategy...

When you say: "But even though, we only run it 900W (Eco&#92Silence setting) all the time and still get the same results."
I can well believe that....they were made pulling more not to actually go faster, but to give the "idea" they may go faster whilew they didn't.
But le me tell you, washers, it's just another different matter, much more complex than vacuum cleaners matter....

kenmoreguy89-2014121914541602908_1.jpg
 
Back
Top