The amazing and gentle Gyrafoam action of my Maytag E2LP

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Was the bedspread run thru the wringer-would think the wringer could cause damage like a spin cycle?would think a 130 yr old fabric item would be as fragile as paper.when I visited the Smithsonian's "restoration" depts-they washed fabric items such as that in a very large,shallow flat tank-and with no agitation.The object was kept flat as possible and moved to a special dryer that again kept the fabric document flat.No wringing,agitation,or spinning.This process is used by them esp on very old flags.
 
another "Great Thing" about Wringer washing

Is that there is no outer tub the dirt and nastyness go down to the bottom, and is filtered by the lint screen. The washtub, and screen can be cleaned out, or sanitized before the rinse or next wash if necessary. If one is forced to use a conventional washer, say in a laundry mat, you never know what`s lurking beyond the holes of the inner tub. Launderess is right "no unbalance situation" the worst thing that could happen, is the wringer washer may want to walk a little but that what the break wheel is for. Best to all
 
Rex, when you have a large, bulky item to put through the wringer, you unlock the roller tension and feed it through. Easy used to make a point about that for their spin dryer washers, saying that it was easier to damp dry items like bedspreads, blankets and quilts in the spinner than with a wringer and it probably is, but it can be done with a wringer.
 
Vintage Items

Well yes, it would depend upon the condition of the item when it comes to cleaning and or "extracting". A heavy but vintage quilt that is very fragile probably won't withstand extraction by either wringer or spinning without a real risk of damage.

OTHO a heavy wool blanket or whatever that is in good condition should be fine.

Most all my vintage laundry manuals give directions for using a wringer washer or mangle (all that was around at the time), when cleanng "comforts", quilts, blankets, coverlets and so forth. As another poster stated upthread you had to adjust the mangle/wringer rollers to suit.

Wringer vs Extraction:

Machine extraction will most always remove more water, detergent residue and so forth even at lower speeds than a wringer. Though each involve forces of compression, a machine can do so (hopefully) by some what evenly distributing weight of an item. On a wringer one has to keep feeding the item through several times, each pass requiring closer and closer spacing of the rollers to squeeze out water. If this is not done properly it can lead to textile damage, especially if air bubbles are trapped at the end of whatever and have no where else to go. For this reason items like pillow slips are always fed into any mangle/ironer/wringer *closed end first*.

Cleaning anything heavy that will only become more so once wet, such as quilts, blankets, coverlets, etc can be a challenge for front loaders. Normally one attempts to have a mix of items in a load so the machine can properly balance, and for good washing action. Large bulky items may by themselves reach the dry weight limit of a washer, and adding another heavy item such as a towel (for balance), may not help things.

What normally happens is the bulky item balls up upon itself, and if the washer isn't careful about spinning, the first attempt can send that heavy wet thing slamming against the drums. Many a domestic front loader has seen it's shocks shattered, concrete balance weights destroyed, and or simply bashed itself to death.
 
Further to "Launderess's" information...

And to answer Rex's question - I suppose I was being rather bold in washing it at all, but I closely examined the fabric and it appeared to be in fantastic condition for its age (it actually feels like it could be a blend of wool and cotton). The Maytag wringer's tension is pre-set, and is not really that tight, unlike some other brands whereby you could manually increase the wringer tension by tightening a screw on the top of the wringer housing

Believe it or not, I even threw it in the dryer! Now that was probably REALLY stupid of me, but I monitored it throughout the drying cycle, and as I said previously - it came out beautifully.

And just in case there are any skeptics out there, I've attached the photo showing it as a backdrop behind my great-great grandparents (seated, circa. 1890). I'm assuming it wasn't new when the photo was taken.

bradross++1-18-2011-22-50-2.jpg
 
Brad ... great photo of your family AND the spread!  WOW ... to be able to have the original spread.  A testament to how well things were made. 

 

It doesn't suprise me that the E2LP handled it with ease; those were really great machines.  It's all in how you feed the item through the rollers, isn't it?  As long as you can keep the item as flat as possible, it works well.  Believe it or not, that's when the silly safety foot pedal came in handy.  You could just lift your foot and readjust the item and then press it again.  That's about the only thing that crazy thing was good for!

 

The gyrafoam action of the Maytag conventional is gentle but thorough.  The big tub of the E helps, too.  When filled full, it uses 18 gallons of water. 

 

Did you use the "soak and agitate" method of washing or did you just wash it for just a few minutes?  I usually let mine run for just a few minutes when I do blankets.  Did you rinse in the machine? 
 
One time, a few years ago

 

 

I was testing Maytag's capacity and I washed a full mixed load on Extra Large in the WP/LSP9245 BO. Then I drained & spun the water into the Maytag J2L , transferring the clothes into the big square white enamel tub. The old girl did just fine, some of the items gliding flat across the surface before going under.

 

Cool to see, but you need a really big load for the Gyrator to execute this square, up, across, down current. At full water level, you can also see how gentle yet thorough the action is. Normally though, I use less water and smaller loads and the action is vigorous and dramatic.

 

The WP holds 21 gallons at this level, and I'm sure Geoff is right about the Tag's 18. I think I pumped all the water in, though; it was full to the gills. Will have to do it again some time.
 
Great picture!

Now there are some true class people.

Love the clothes. If only today we still dressed like the victorian era. Men in our 3 piece suits, pocket watches, and crazy beards that make us look like Johannes Brahms. :)
 
I think its amazing an item that old is in such good condition-must be excellent care and keeping the item in proper conditions-no hot attics or cold basements,or out side storage sheds-the best storing the item under "human" conditions-an area the is climate controlled-in those conditions most things can last indefinitely.
 
Brad,

It is apparent to me that your ancestors took great pride in this bedspread, so it's great to see that it is now being cared for by someone who truly appreciates it's historical significance to your family.

 

Did the dyes bleed when you washed it?
 
Anwers to questions raised ...

First to Geoff (geoffdelp) ... no, I didn't soak it at all. Just started the agitation and dropped it into the sudsy water. I've been using "ALL" detergent now for over a year and love it! And yes, I have to rinse in the machine as well - no room in the apartment for rinse tubs!

Second to Brandon (washernoob) ... I actually DO dress in late Victorian period clothing occasionally! I volunteer at the local museum and on occasion, I'm required to dress in clothing of that time. That era (1890-1910) fascinates me. I've attached a pic of me taken a while ago, wearing vintage morning attire and a bowler hat.

Thirdly to Tim (polkanut)... no, the dye didn't bleed in the least! And I even washed in hot water. It was risky, I know, but I really wanted to get it CLEAN! I was prepared for some shrinkage, and that didn't happen. Would love to know what is the actually material, or if it's a blend. I think fabric blends were pretty rare back then, but maybe somebody else can shed some light on that.

bradross++1-20-2011-20-21-48.jpg
 
Yeowsuh!

Brad, you look like a younger, handsomer Teddy Roosevelt.

 

I have been happily wringing for 25 years or so, and am gearing up for a Wringer Treatise soon.
 
Great picture

HI Brad, Wow, I am impressed. I have a Maytag like yours and you really can control the amount of water, washing time etc. I guess you could do that too in an automatic.
The bedspread is fantastic, It would sure look good on my walnut bed made in 1875. Thanks for sharing. Bye for now. Gary
 
Back
Top