Jeez, Chet!
That description of operation makes my brain spin!
You know I prefer things simple, direct, and reliable, but that ladder of operation seems too complex with all its "this happens, then that happens, which then triggers another happening." etc etc etc.




Additionally, I have to say that the use of semiconductors in design is not a bad thing, as long as the designer is highly qualified to insure long-term reliability.
That depends on on staying with proven designs, and also saves the manufacturer from lawsuits and litigation, and secures their reputation.
When you're dealing with potentially dangerous products, like a home heating system, etc., it's imperative. - people's lives are one the line.
Unlike a washing machine and how they've been building them lately.
Keeping things simple of course, lessens the chances of a failure, along with the expenses to correct said failure.
With all those sensors and triggers and mechanics you've mentioned, it's sounding a bit overdone complexity to me.
That Honeywell electronic ignition system that I installed that's been controlling my boiler for 18 years has been reliable, with flawless operation - and gives me the peace of mind that I expect from it.
It even has the ability to tell me if and when it senses any problems by the way of the LED blinking codes.
Which never happened yet.
Of course I'd have to get out the owners manual's troubleshooting section to read what the codes mean.
And the Honeywell thermostat that I installed inly needs it's 2 AA batteries replaced rarely - it's display warns me with "low battery" and gives me plenty of weeks to install new batteries.