Rapunzel, the debate happened thirty years ago. You missed it.
There's broad consensus in the scientific community that climate change in happening - even Bush admits that. There's also consensus that human activity has contributed to it, if not caused it outright, and that we need to take some corrective action.
It is a "real factual issue", and the trouble is that billions of taxpayer dollars have *not* been committed to it. We hem and haw, largely due to corporate controlled scientists and right-wing media personalities. These folks are the moral descendants of the scientists Philip Morris employed a generation ago to tell us that smoking was good for you, even though the company knew it was dangerous.
You're entitled to believe whatever you want to believe - no one is "shouting you down", and if you imagine that you're somehow "standing up to me" (when we're merely having a disagreement) that's your right. But there's no need to act like a victim just because someone challenges an assertion you made.
There's broad consensus in the scientific community that climate change in happening - even Bush admits that. There's also consensus that human activity has contributed to it, if not caused it outright, and that we need to take some corrective action.
It is a "real factual issue", and the trouble is that billions of taxpayer dollars have *not* been committed to it. We hem and haw, largely due to corporate controlled scientists and right-wing media personalities. These folks are the moral descendants of the scientists Philip Morris employed a generation ago to tell us that smoking was good for you, even though the company knew it was dangerous.
You're entitled to believe whatever you want to believe - no one is "shouting you down", and if you imagine that you're somehow "standing up to me" (when we're merely having a disagreement) that's your right. But there's no need to act like a victim just because someone challenges an assertion you made.