UK News Story

[nrones]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again.... too

It should have never happened.

My point:
Making your oppineon - ok, Informing people - ok, but making 9 or 10 thrads about SAME happening, about SAME brand?? Why?

Also the funniest thing is that any info that comes for "defence" is being forgotten, and each thread gets new comments (with same complaints) no matter what.. example: "thousands of machines" or "it can kill"

And now, specially for you, since you seem to be one who "learns" those kids how to "use" this forum (where I totally agree with you in that case), and from the other side you are replying on 2 SAME threads that are BOTH active just because of the manner of that.. if say, Aquarius8000 made a same thread as one still active, he would be well judged by now (and he'd deserve it)...

Dex

 

[aquacycle]

You're right about the 2 posts on the same topic. However, there's still no hiding from the fact that all you've done is attempt to defend Candy by highlighting the errors of another company! And as I said, that's hardly a valid defence!

 

[nrones]

Sorry, I'm mixing threads

Now that I read the whole thread up, I get it, and I'm sorry about that. I just got confused.. It now started to confuse me that whole number of threads, I don't know what was written were..

The reason I wrote that is because I read a lot of comments like this:
Bad Candy, Shame Candy - Look how responsible Beko is..

that was why I wrote "how responsible...", but now I realize it even wasn't on this thread, so sorry again really

Dex

 

[aquacycle]

^Oooh right, I'm with you now! Sorry about the misunderstanding. I must have missed a post or 2 by mistake, I thought you'd simply argued that "this happened to Candy, but this happened to Beko, so it's ok". I understand what you meant now. And I agree, both Beko AND Candy should have done something...should be DOING something. But as always, it's all about the money. Sad times