I agree with Laundress, the administration at Va. Tech has much to answer for.
Traditionally, even in states with liberal gun carry laws, guns are strictly forbidden on college campuses. With the amount of heavy binge drinking and partying at colleges, this is probably a good idea, but when something tragic like the Virginia Tech shootings occur, it makes me think twice about it. I suppose that we will have to have armed security stationed in every college and school building from now on, and install metal detectors (many high schools around here have them). I think that basic self defense should be taught in Jr. high and High school as part of the PE program - it might help people to react in an emergency and save their lives. Training can make a difference:
There was an incident at my college (Texas A&M) before I enrolled. The university police chief told us about it in orientation: A girl in the Corps of Cadets broke up with her boyfriend. He went off the deep end, dressed in camouflage, took an AR-15 (civilian M-16) and went to her dorm room at night to kill her. Her training in the Corps of Cadets kicked in and she was immediately able to disarm him and call the police.
This morning, my radio station reminded me of an incident at another college , a law school I think - can't remember the name, where a gunman entered and started shooting. One of the students ran outside to his car, got a gun and three other men, and they subdued the gunman.
In Killeen during the Luby's massacre, several people who were in the parking lot or escaped through a window tried to get guns from nearby local businesses to stop the shooter, but none of the local businesses had guns on their premises.
In the big bank robbery shootout in LA (eerily similar to the one in the movie "Heat"), the outgunned police actually went to nearby gun stores to get assault rifles to fight the bank robbers.
I firmly believe that citizens should have the right to own guns. The second ammendment refers to a 'militia' and many say that is the National Guard, not civilians. But the dictionary defininition, and the general definition during colonial and Revolutionary War times is: all able bodied male citizens between 18 and 45 who are not already members of the regular armed forces and who are declared by authority subject to call to military service. In colonial times, all local men (the Militia) in a city or county area would be called for defense in an emergency. They would provide their own weapon. When you read various published articles written by our founding fathers and printed before,during, and after the constitutional convention, you can see that their intentions were that all citizens should be allowed to own a gun, not just the military and police - their biggest fear was a totallitarian government, they just fought a war to be free of this.
~i prefer to not judge the assailant, since i really have no clue what brought him to this end. lifes challenges are just too much for some people.
I personnally will judge the gunman: there is nothing that warrants this type of action. Anyone who does something like this has a serious character flaw or mental illness.