aquacycle
Well-known member
Louis, I love that Lux! Those are branded AEG here in the UK.
washer enthusiasts: what's your choice of vacuum?
- Thread starter aquacycle
- Start date
Help Support :
twintubdexter
Well-known member
last post on this topic I promise...
I'm thinking of buying a Rowenta Delta Force rechargeable stick vac. Does anyone have any experience with one of these?
$250,000 in bargain-priced Palm Springs, although certainly not the Movie Colony or the toney Las Palmas area. This place could use a good gutting. Remember to picture it in 120 degree heat.
I'm thinking of buying a Rowenta Delta Force rechargeable stick vac. Does anyone have any experience with one of these?
$250,000 in bargain-priced Palm Springs, although certainly not the Movie Colony or the toney Las Palmas area. This place could use a good gutting. Remember to picture it in 120 degree heat.
optima
Well-known member
What's your choice
Hate all of todays Vacuum cleaners. Here's my current Cleaners. Panasonic MC-E42 , Hoover U2464 Turbopower 2 & Electrolux Z2020 Cylinder.
Hate all of todays Vacuum cleaners. Here's my current Cleaners. Panasonic MC-E42 , Hoover U2464 Turbopower 2 & Electrolux Z2020 Cylinder.
that 'headlight' can come in handy for when the power goes out, at least you can see, and finish your vacuuming!.....
too funny Martin!
Gary
too funny Martin!
Gary
aquacycle
Well-known member
Hate all of todays Vacuum cleaners
they're not all bad, Craig. There are still some great cleaners on the market
they're not all bad, Craig. There are still some great cleaners on the market
DirectDriveDave
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 456
House here has central vacuuming. The canister, made by Vacuflo is in the basement. it has been very reliable. It is on its second motor now, but the original one, replaced in 2007, lasted 18 years, so I would say that is pretty good.
The canister itself cant be heard much because of its location, the exhaust vent outside is pretty loud, which I am actually more than okay with, to me, that means it is working properly.
The hose itself doesn't make too much noise, adding the regular, or power-brush to it definitely increases the sound level, but it's a quick disconnect to do if need be.
The canister itself cant be heard much because of its location, the exhaust vent outside is pretty loud, which I am actually more than okay with, to me, that means it is working properly.
The hose itself doesn't make too much noise, adding the regular, or power-brush to it definitely increases the sound level, but it's a quick disconnect to do if need be.
iheartmaytag
Well-known member
I am a member of both sites.
Though I have several Vacuums, my favorite brand will always be Kirby. Though I am fond of my New Tristar MG2 I got off Ebay for $107.50. The Kirby UG would be the one I would keep If I had to get rid of the other 15.
Though I have several Vacuums, my favorite brand will always be Kirby. Though I am fond of my New Tristar MG2 I got off Ebay for $107.50. The Kirby UG would be the one I would keep If I had to get rid of the other 15.
optima
Well-known member
Chris
I work in Electrical Retail & i have to say i hate them all especially the Vax U91 series Upright Cleaners, They are just terrible, most of the problems are the suction motors burning out in no time. Not very good !!! Just as well they have a 6 year guarantee.
I work in Electrical Retail & i have to say i hate them all especially the Vax U91 series Upright Cleaners, They are just terrible, most of the problems are the suction motors burning out in no time. Not very good !!! Just as well they have a 6 year guarantee.
aquacycle
Well-known member
Sorry Craig, I have to disagree with you. I've found the Vax Mach Air series to be very good and in the event of the motor burning out, one is covered by Vax's 6 year guaruntee so it's not all that bad. At least it's got a proper dust seperation cyclone in it, unlike Vax's lower end cleaners which truly are awful.
What about Numatic, Sebo and Miele? Those are the top 3 on the market in my opinion and all 3 are incredibly high performing and reliable. Dyson are the best if you want a bagless cleaner, though they high price doesn't really reflect the quality of the machine but they're still pretty good.
Whilst I do agree that a lot of the older machines were far better than most of the cleaners on todays market, I think there are machines available now that were better than a lot of older ones too. I mean, I'd rather be using a modern Sebo x1.1 than a Goblin Housemaid, wouldn't you?
What about Numatic, Sebo and Miele? Those are the top 3 on the market in my opinion and all 3 are incredibly high performing and reliable. Dyson are the best if you want a bagless cleaner, though they high price doesn't really reflect the quality of the machine but they're still pretty good.
Whilst I do agree that a lot of the older machines were far better than most of the cleaners on todays market, I think there are machines available now that were better than a lot of older ones too. I mean, I'd rather be using a modern Sebo x1.1 than a Goblin Housemaid, wouldn't you?
optima
Well-known member
Henry
I will make an exception regarding Numatics, but the biggest rip off of all time has to go to Dyson !!!
I will make an exception regarding Numatics, but the biggest rip off of all time has to go to Dyson !!!
aquacycle
Well-known member
but the biggest rip off of all time has to go to Dyson
I agree that they're a rip off. Especially the latest models at £399. They're the best bagless vacuum on the market, it has to be said. But the quality of the machine is somewhat lacking. When paying that amount of money, you'd expect a nice, solid machine that will last for years, but instead you get a flimsey heap of plastic. Performance wise, they're alright, but as you said they're a rip off.
Why pay £399 for a flimsey Dyson when you can buy a Sebo for £200?
I agree that they're a rip off. Especially the latest models at £399. They're the best bagless vacuum on the market, it has to be said. But the quality of the machine is somewhat lacking. When paying that amount of money, you'd expect a nice, solid machine that will last for years, but instead you get a flimsey heap of plastic. Performance wise, they're alright, but as you said they're a rip off.
Why pay £399 for a flimsey Dyson when you can buy a Sebo for £200?
1982 Electrolux
I use my Electrolux 2100 circa 1982. I bought it recently on EBay, that is where this picture is from. These units have used the same bag since the 1950's which has an end seal, and is still available at my local hardware store. Actually similar to the new Aerus, and may use the same bag. The power brush is not original, and I got a new hose. I love the solodity of an Electrolux and the suction is quite good. These models have an auxilary filter on the top also. Retractible cord is another nice feature. Before this one I had a 1953 LX model, but the cord stopped retracting. I also have a few Kirbys, but since the house is all hardwood or tile and vinyl, I normally use the Electrolux. And I like to do my own cleaning, like washing, it is enjoyable to me.
Martin
I use my Electrolux 2100 circa 1982. I bought it recently on EBay, that is where this picture is from. These units have used the same bag since the 1950's which has an end seal, and is still available at my local hardware store. Actually similar to the new Aerus, and may use the same bag. The power brush is not original, and I got a new hose. I love the solodity of an Electrolux and the suction is quite good. These models have an auxilary filter on the top also. Retractible cord is another nice feature. Before this one I had a 1953 LX model, but the cord stopped retracting. I also have a few Kirbys, but since the house is all hardwood or tile and vinyl, I normally use the Electrolux. And I like to do my own cleaning, like washing, it is enjoyable to me.
Martin
For the most part I use a Kirby Legend II, probably my favorite Kirby for regular use: the self-propelled Kirbys seem to be a little bulky to me. I also have a neat Compact C-5 and a C-4 should I ever need a canister type. And for utility use a Rigid shop-vac. I really love that thing, it has taken all kinds of abuse and keeps on going.
Louis,
That Electrolux of yours is similar in design to the Ergospace, except it looks like it's a bit larger and has a powered carpet brush. The Ergospace has one of those vacuum powered turbo floor brushes, which works fairly well on thin carpets, but with the non rotating brush floor tool, the Ergospace rocks on bare floors. The Eureka upright really works better on carpet. I especially like the clever combination hand brush/upholstery tool of the Ergospace that fits snugly in the back of the machine. And of course the internal cord reel. I think yours also uses the same bags as the Ergospace (S-Bag Classic). A very high quality dust bag, IMHO. I'm not sure the variable motor speed control on the Ergospace is really necessary. I nearly always leave it on full blast, but I suppose for some applications like drapes or thin throw rugs it might be good.
That Electrolux of yours is similar in design to the Ergospace, except it looks like it's a bit larger and has a powered carpet brush. The Ergospace has one of those vacuum powered turbo floor brushes, which works fairly well on thin carpets, but with the non rotating brush floor tool, the Ergospace rocks on bare floors. The Eureka upright really works better on carpet. I especially like the clever combination hand brush/upholstery tool of the Ergospace that fits snugly in the back of the machine. And of course the internal cord reel. I think yours also uses the same bags as the Ergospace (S-Bag Classic). A very high quality dust bag, IMHO. I'm not sure the variable motor speed control on the Ergospace is really necessary. I nearly always leave it on full blast, but I suppose for some applications like drapes or thin throw rugs it might be good.
passatdoc
Well-known member
@Louis
If my Miele canister died, I would probably buy a mid-range (without electric wand) Miele, so that I could use my attachments collection. But if those attachments fit an Electrolux, I'd buy an Electrolux canister instead and save several hundred dollars. Because I have the S7 upright as well, I have an efficient way to clean carpets without need of a power head (yes, the old 217 Miele power head would sit around unused, but so what, it's already paid for). However, I only bought the S7 a year ago, after owning the canister since 2002, and one reason to buy the S7 was for use on carpet if the S500 canister ever died---giving me the option NOT to have to spend $1000 to replace the S5 canister. Either a mid-range 12A Miele canister (without electric wand) or a higher end Electrolux canister would do the job (assuming the Miele attachments would fit an Electrolux---I bet there are adapters for this problem).
The reason many Americans who buy Miele end up with the high end ($1000+ models) is that they need it to clean both carpet and hard floors, and you can't get the integrated "Quick Connect" electric wand to operate a power head without spending $900 minimum. There are less expensive versions, with a cord attached to the exterior of the wand that you can plug into a power head, but that would become tiresome rather quickly. But those less expensive versions would be great in a home with mostly/only hard floors, or in my case (half hard floor, half carpet) owning two vacs (one a high quality upright) eliminates the need to use a canister power head.
If my Miele canister died, I would probably buy a mid-range (without electric wand) Miele, so that I could use my attachments collection. But if those attachments fit an Electrolux, I'd buy an Electrolux canister instead and save several hundred dollars. Because I have the S7 upright as well, I have an efficient way to clean carpets without need of a power head (yes, the old 217 Miele power head would sit around unused, but so what, it's already paid for). However, I only bought the S7 a year ago, after owning the canister since 2002, and one reason to buy the S7 was for use on carpet if the S500 canister ever died---giving me the option NOT to have to spend $1000 to replace the S5 canister. Either a mid-range 12A Miele canister (without electric wand) or a higher end Electrolux canister would do the job (assuming the Miele attachments would fit an Electrolux---I bet there are adapters for this problem).
The reason many Americans who buy Miele end up with the high end ($1000+ models) is that they need it to clean both carpet and hard floors, and you can't get the integrated "Quick Connect" electric wand to operate a power head without spending $900 minimum. There are less expensive versions, with a cord attached to the exterior of the wand that you can plug into a power head, but that would become tiresome rather quickly. But those less expensive versions would be great in a home with mostly/only hard floors, or in my case (half hard floor, half carpet) owning two vacs (one a high quality upright) eliminates the need to use a canister power head.
hoovermatic
Well-known member
I am more than happy with my Miele S5211 vacuum. It's powerful, quiet and does everything that I need from a vacuum. I have a Panasonic MC-E42 in the loft which I haven't used for years and should really try and sell it. That said, if I could get hold of a Hoover Junior U1104 or an Electrolux 502 I wouldn't say no!
dirtybuck
Well-known member
I have a Kenmore Whispertone that I bought 12 years ago and is still going strong. The POS Eureka I had that the Kenmore replaced died on me right in the middle of vacuuming my carpet.
I don't know who manufactures Kenmore's today, but back then it was a revamped model made by Panasonic.
I don't know who manufactures Kenmore's today, but back then it was a revamped model made by Panasonic.
I've got several...I grew up firmly in the Consumer Reports "buy a canister and an upright" mode of thought, so I've got on the main floor my grandmother's 1970 Electrolux and a Hoover Elite upright; downstairs in the basement I've got an 1970s Sunbeam tank (very similar to Electrolux design) and a cheap bare-bones 1990 Hoover Elite which I bought at Shillito-Rikes in Cincinnati for $49.00. Upstairs I have a Hoover Z bagless which I bought on sale at Home Depot about 6 years ago (was Hoover's last gasp of unique design) which has quite good all-around suction except that the diverter to the tools is broken...and the vacuum place won't even look at it (they did do a warranty service on it for me though for a split in the dust screen) and a Porta-Power which I got at an estate sale 3 mos ago. Also there's a garbage-picked Royal upright in the house somewhere.
epixstar128
New member
I have two kirby 511 and use them both on my house the older kirbys are much smaller
norgeway
Well-known member
I have about 200!
So I switch them out fairly often, just so its at least 40 years old, im happy, usually use a tank or canister.
So I switch them out fairly often, just so its at least 40 years old, im happy, usually use a tank or canister.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
Who is the real manufacturer behind the Wascomat Crossover/Encore washers.
- Latest: gelaundry4ever
-
-
