jamman_98
Well-known member
My 2 cents
First of all because of Standards Based Education and No Childs Behind Left. We teach standards not kids. As an educator for almost 20 years, kids have to know so much more and more of them is demanded. English, Math and Science have dominated courses. Home economics is fluff and not needed. What is interesting are those fluff couses like money management, home economics etc did have there purpose. But you know SAT scores are more important than life skills. Now after all that, our state legislators in SC have decided that basic money magament skills have to be taught as part of the social studies curriculum. Gee if we had had Home Economics for kids maybe we would not have a generation of kids in debt and financial crisis. INHO.
First of all because of Standards Based Education and No Childs Behind Left. We teach standards not kids. As an educator for almost 20 years, kids have to know so much more and more of them is demanded. English, Math and Science have dominated courses. Home economics is fluff and not needed. What is interesting are those fluff couses like money management, home economics etc did have there purpose. But you know SAT scores are more important than life skills. Now after all that, our state legislators in SC have decided that basic money magament skills have to be taught as part of the social studies curriculum. Gee if we had had Home Economics for kids maybe we would not have a generation of kids in debt and financial crisis. INHO.