What has society come to??

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

twinniefan

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
718
Location
Sydney Australia
I have just been reading a terrible story in an online edition of one of Australia's leading newspapers,and it goes like this:
An 80 year old lady collapsed while waiting in a very large queue of people at the Qantas check-in counter, 2 Qantas check-in staff closed their counters and immediately rushed to the poor lady's aid, when they were booed,abused and spat at by angry frustrated passengers.
The dear lady subsequently passed away,but what on earth has a society come to when this can happen?,for God's sake a dear old lady was dying in front of them, and they abused the staff who were trying to help her.
I am not so sure I like living in Australia any more.
Steve.
 
Alas---

That is a very sad story, but I am sure that the same or worse could happen here in the States.

We seem to have almost lost our compassion, our ability to (even temporarily) put other people first.

I am not at all certain what the solution might be, however. Wish I did know.

Lawrence/Maytagbear
 
Actually, there has been an update to this story. Apparently passengers waiting to check in weren't heckling check-in staff rushing to the dying woman's aid, but security. Please refer to the attached article.

Remember that it is wise never to accept anything from the media at face value. Question everything you hear, read and watch - ALWAYS.

 
I'm guilty

I was sitting at a traffic light on the way home, first in line. Heard a siren coming. Saw down the street it was a fire engine. Naturally, the light turned green and it was proper to just sit there. I still said a dirty word in frustration. I was only 1 of 2 cars that got through the light before it changed. I do get intense during this time of year because I don't have much daylight time for me to get home and I've had to change my route home due to construction and it can take me up to twice as long as my old route.
 
what Toggles said

Yeah watch more than one version!!!!! Cant stress that enough!!!

Remember the days of three networks giving you the news...and they all agreed?!!!

Maybe we shouldnt be asking whats become of society these days but what has become of the media ( or anyone else that is suppose to be held to a hire standard)

We live in Dangerous times folks
 
I belive this is a time for more truth....While yes, in the past all the news outlets matched, but who is to say they were all not reporting the same warped story?!?! At least nowadays, with all the modern information technologies, we have a sort of check and balance system going on with the news media. More than one side of the story can get reported, and news outlets can be called upon the facts, and mis-reporting. News outlets complain that there are fewer and fewer people listening, viewing, or reading their information. This is probably because people do not trust the information they are getting anymore. With the exchange of information so good these days, ordinary people can call them to task when they mis-report a story! The news media outlets are under higher scrutiny today, and probably put out more accurate stories today than they did 30 or even 50 years ago for that simple fact....Just like the age old capitalism theory...competition improves the breed!

Like Toggles said, get your news from more than one outlet and form your own opinion on the story after hearing from all the sources!
 
thanks cybervant...I hadnt thought of it that way. But I still
think that it sucks that we even have to check and balance the news media. We are suppose to be able to trust them. I personally dont. I question everything and I learned to do that from a composition professor in college.Said he, Just coz something is in print ,dosent mean its true.

I still think they are held to a hire standard and should be forced to act accordingly. I see way too much of the reporters (or thier employers) personal slant on these stories.I think that should be illegal.

How about you guys that have been around awhile? Is it better now or no? Heres your chance for once a younger guy is willing to listen (smiles)
 
I also don't like the "slants" from the big three networks and some others.Don't listen to or watch the news much anymore-you can't trust the messengers!Same with the newspapers and magazines.Instead of "editorilizing" the stories the news organizations should do their job-just present the news in as neutral of way possible-like what used to be done.Its no wonder shortwave radios are selling very well in the US-folks are now turning to overseas sources for news stories.I get some of my news from the outfit I work for-kinda amazing the differences.
 
Since I'm sure many of you have not heard this story, I think it is interesting, but certainly won't make national news. FYI Lincoln Park (where this man killed a cook) is nearby Melvindale where he lived. Lenox township is about 45 miles away and is very rural. I'm sorry, I don't have a lot of sympathy for this guy.

BTW, did serious damage to the combine, but the farmer was not hurt.

11-24-2007-08-43-38--huggybear.jpg
 
The problem with the media isn't a liberal or conservative bias - this country thrived when each city had a few party-affiliated newspapers, that bought their own perspective to a story - it's the current media ownership situation. It is similar to an oligopoly.

Up until the 80's, most papers, radio stations and TV stations were independently owned, or part of small chains. The networks were all independent as well. They all had their own newsrooms, that competed against each other to produce a good news product. As such, they covered local and regional stuff much better.

The big networks were independent as well, and each had foreign bureaus. While they had pressure from advertisers, their independent nature and competitive forces held that in check.

Then came cable, and the lessening of ownership regulations under the Clinton administration. NBC became part of GE (The biggest military defense contractor) CBS became part of Viacom (The huge cable TV/entertainment conglomerate) and ABC part of Disney (Another huge conglomerate)

You started to see TV commercials during the news for companies like Lockheed and Boeing - companies that don't sell to TV consumers, but have a vested interest in how the news is presented. Regulations on advertising prescription drugs were relaxed, and the airwaves were flooded with ads from big pharma, telling the consumer to go to his doctor with self-diagnosis. Suddenly, news divisions were yet another profit center, and bureaus were closed and operations curtailed. The important message became whatever the advertisers and the network's corporate parents deemed appropriate. Radio stations, which had been consolidated under clear channel, followed suit.

Rupert Murdoch, the corporate activist disguised as a conservative, started Fox news, and hired a former Nixon media consultant as well as President Bush's cousin to run it. It operated at staggering losses for several years, only to be bailed out by the same group of corporations consisting primarily of defense and pharma companies. It still has a very small part of the ratings pie, but it has created its influence through its deep corporate pockets.

So there you have it. We get lowest common denominator "newsertainment" (Missing girls, celebrity gossip, car chases, fake investigative reporting) all designed to distract rather than inform. Trouble is, theres a minority of Americans out there that lack critical thinking skills, and that group is big enough to maintain the status quo.

Sorry for my rant, but this is one of my pet peeves. Local TV news, in particular, is inane.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top