To PaulG
> What happened to the US television manufacturing industry? HELLO!!!
I agree. All of the manufacturing involving electronics was moved overseas due to the cost of labour. I find it ironic that Intel makes CPU's for computers in the USA, but all of the rest of the components are made usually somewhere in East Asia, like Taiwan.
This is a story we are going to see time and time again where manufacturing jobs are moving out of the US due to the high cost of labour in comparison to everywhere else. The US is becoming a country of managers.
Even today in the US, it is not competitive to start an electronics company. Ever looked on the back of an Apple Product? Designed in the US, but made by Foxconn... in Taiwan.
How can a worker in the US which gets paid $21 an hour (Plus benefits) compete with someone in Thailand who is being paid the equivalent of 55 cents an hour? They can't. They also have absolutely abhorrent labour practices there too. Something which hasn't been seen in Europe or North America since the 1700's.. 16 hour work days, working 7 days a week with zero benefits.
Labour unions? In a communist China? Yeah right. Not going to happen. Even if the workers stand up and unite, the government will be quick to arrest them. If they put up a fight, they are executed. (That whole human rights thing...)
This type of competition is killing every manufacturing industry in the US and in Canada. Heck, Electrolux was given a large tax subsidy by the Ontario government if they would keep their vacuum cleaner manufacturing in Canada, but the pricks moved their factories down to Mexico because.... it was cheaper. Go figure.
> foreign appliance manufacturers have unique and tasty deals with the retailers
> that are hard or impossible for USA manufacturers to participate with.
Agreed!! When labour is cheap, the end price is cheap.. which means consumers are more likely to buy it... So, you have the Wal-Mart syndrome.. everyone wants their $8 waffle makers.
> Don't say that the quality of the USA product is so wretched.
In my rant, I didn't mean to say that anything US made sucked. US made TV sets were built like tanks and lasted as long as them too, provided you kept changing the tubes and replaced the dried out electrolytic caps as required. Yes, they were expensive, but it wasn't uncommon for a family to keep the same set for 10-20 years before it was ready for the scrap heap.
The problem is that a lot of US companies had to cut corners to keep their product competitively priced for the market. Since the quality sucked, they sold less. Since they sold less, they have to cut more corners to stay competitive. It is a vicious cycle.
We see it all the time with restaurants here. They start off with low prices and excellent food. Then the quality of the food starts dropping and the prices slowly start going up. As a result, they get less customers, so the prices keep going up and the food eventually ends up sucking. Pretty soon, you end up paying $30 for a steak which is made from Grade C beef which has excessive amounts of meat glue in it to give it the appearance of an actual steak. (Yes, this has happened to me.) Of course, the inevitable happens....
> USA washers CLEAN CLOTHES and work well.
Let me fix that for you... "USA Built washers clean clothes and work well."
> Is the foreign stuff SO MUCH BETTER? In my opinion, NO.
I disagree with that. I'll keep citing Miele as an example. Miele could have been based out of the US for all I care.. but the reason why they have their reputation is because of the company policies and methodologies behind how they manufacture their product. Are they expensive? Heck yeah. Is it worth it? Absolutely.
> I believe the masses think that foreign brands are different, chic.
I think that is a part of it, but I don't think that is the rule. I think it's more like, "It's on Sale at Wal-Mart for $500, so I'm buying it." that is the problem. Some consumers couldn't care less what it is badged under, they just want the features and the functionality for the best price.
> The fact that they deviated from convention and bought a foreign brand somehow makes them smarter.
I would like to disagree with that sentiment. It all depends on the circumstances. If you have a high powered lawyer who wants a status symbol in his basement, it's not going to say "GE" on it.

The mother of four children couldn't care less, but if they do, they'll buy something they know works.
> THE RETAILERS
Yes. That's exactly it. GE and WCI have some really solid tie ins with most of the major distribution channels. All of the appliances in our home were Roper (WCI) ones. The washer/dryer set were Whirlpool. However, LG and Samsung are making some really good inroads into that market. The day when I see homes come with those appliances, it will pretty much be game over.
> THE USA MANUFACTURER
Which is becoming a rare breed. I agree, they should make the foreign product look like a toy or garbage in comparison. How to do it though? Well, if you found two washers that did exactly the same thing, had all the same features, had exactly the same tub size and even the same warranty, but the US made washer cost $1000 more, which one would you buy?
How do you go to the management and say, "Your price point needs to be $1000 lower to stay competitive." .. If you were in their shoes, how would you do it?
> THE CUSTOMER
The customer ultimately speaks with their money. However, it is also market forces and reputation which also drive the sales. Marketing can only take a company so far. When you have a mother of four children who buys a new Whirlpool and the thing breaks down 2 months after the warranty has expired and she's still got another years worth of payments left on it and Whirlpool wants 75 percent of the cost of the machine to fix it, who do you think she's going to buy from next time?
> I really blame the customer a lot for the influx of USA job-killing foreign
> appliances.
I think the customer is one part of the equation, but it is not the sole cause. We live in a world economy and in order for the US to stay competitive, there has to be a lot of things which have to change. Again, how do you compete with someone who makes 55 cents an hour?
> Today's kids buying appliances don't seem to understand the value of 100 year
> old Whirlpool or GE support
That's the problem. What good is all that support if the company doesn't stand behind their product?
> or the quality of Speed-Queen.
Agreed. Selling the interior of a machine is a lot harder than selling gizmos and features. Especially when you consider their "Top End" front loader has as many features as a BOL WCI, GE, LG or Samsung machine, but costs as much as a TOL one.
It is much easier to sell "Powerfoam", than it is to sell, "A tub spider which doesn't break after a few short years of regular use."
> been a bit more patriotic and bought a Zenith or Admiral etc,
That's the problem as well. I'm Canadian so patriotism doesn't come into the mix. I couldn't care if a TV was made in Chicago or Taiwan. What I want is something which is built well, has a good warranty and is decently priced. I will find the best manufacturer out there and I won't buy an inferior product.
With my parents growing up, I recall we had a GE TV set, then a Ford Philco TV, then a Magnavox, then a Hitachi.. All of those were domestic (As domestic as can be living in Canada) except for the last one.. Why did my father buy a Hitachi? It was the cheapest 46" TV on the floor at the time. (Back in 1992)