danemodsandy
Well-known member
Alan:
I would still suspect a 27-inch Maggie of being a projection set, if such a huge screen size was available from that company in 1952. DuMont's Royal Sovereign was considered enormous at 30 inches at that time. I've done some Googling, and I have found references to 27-inch Maggies as early as '56, but not earlier, at least not yet. <br
Since Maggie was very much a luxury brand, they did tend to have sizes and features sooner than other makes, so this is hardly the last word, and I should stress that the info available on Google appears to be a long way from complete. It would be interesting to see exactly what Maggie was offering as a 27-inch set so early. Those Royal Sovereigns were sort of like Packards were to car owners - so expensive, even other luxury-make owners couldn't always justify the expenditure.
I would still suspect a 27-inch Maggie of being a projection set, if such a huge screen size was available from that company in 1952. DuMont's Royal Sovereign was considered enormous at 30 inches at that time. I've done some Googling, and I have found references to 27-inch Maggies as early as '56, but not earlier, at least not yet. <br
Since Maggie was very much a luxury brand, they did tend to have sizes and features sooner than other makes, so this is hardly the last word, and I should stress that the info available on Google appears to be a long way from complete. It would be interesting to see exactly what Maggie was offering as a 27-inch set so early. Those Royal Sovereigns were sort of like Packards were to car owners - so expensive, even other luxury-make owners couldn't always justify the expenditure.