Kirbys are good machines, no doubt about it. But in comparison, Royal, back then made more sense and were worth buying for. Take the Royal Everlast 8300 for example, one of the last Royals ever made before the company ceased production. The Royal costed $749 whereas the Kirby costs $1,499 (Now a hundred more). The Royal was a better constructed machine. Metal fan, metal switch, metal cord hooks, metal handle forks, etc. Kirby's are plastic in comparison and I've seen them break more than Royal's. The Royal actually cleans better since it had a 10 amp motor whereas Kirby it uses 7 amps. Royal had a better warranty which was 7 years compare to 3 years on Kirby. The Royal was more maneuverable since it's not self propelled like Kirby, in fact it pulls by itself on the brushroll which doesn't make it required to have it self propelled. Not to mention that it's also lighter weight than the Kirby. And the Royal was more widely available to buy and to take in for warranty repair, they were sold in vacuum shops. Overall, I preferred Royal over Kirby back then. Kirbys again are still good vacuums but as a former vacuum repair technician and sales person through several vacuum stores, they're WAY overpriced and uses plastic parts.