A very sad day :(

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Only 1 in 4?

Out in the Rocky Mountain West, even folks who take each day at a time, devil may care, you can't change the future, all life is a risk, no guarantees...
Carry uninsured motorist insurance to the maximum possible.

When I'm in the 'States, I spend a lot of time on the road, mainly between Cheyenne and Fort Collins. Drive a stretch of interstate 25 five-ten times a week. At least once, often twice every week, I will be passed (I refuse to drive faster than the speed limit of 75 except when passing) by someone going way over 100mph. Don't give me the "speed is relative, how'd you know" line - I drive in Germany where anyone doing only 75mph on our Autobahnen is a high risk and shouldn't be on the road.
These folks pass on the right, on the left, down the middle...
And no, they aren't all driving big trucks.
Many are Air Force stationed in Cheyenne and think their special status (until recently, the military would suddenly have to "transfer out" a servicemember in trouble with the local cops, so sorry, out of jurisdiction now) lets them do whatever they want. Seriously dangerous drivers, I have had them tailgate me in the passing lane when I was passing a line of cars and couldn't have pulled over if I wanted to. Furious and flipping me off for daring to block their path.
Did have the joy of having one pass me on the right (I was moving with the traffic, going about 65-70) when he swerved right in and out...in front of one of those cute little black Dodges. You know the ones, rams in the front, cherries on top, little confinement cage in the back...Cheyenne cops don't have the best rep, but yay! for them that day.
The worst drivers in winter snow and fog are, by far, the locals. Mother Nature's laws of physics just don't apply to their SUVs and cars with ABS, Traction Control and Stability Management...until mommy loses her temper and decides to spank.
The most clueless, not nasty, clueless are the Texans. Of the minor winter accidents I have seen this year, nearly all involved "drivers" from Texas. I'm talking about sliding into a car at a slippery intersection, chopping the mirror off a parked car in the fog, that sort of stuff.
I had to prove my ability to drive stick (Toggles, go stick needles in your dolly) and cope with winter road conditions before I got my license here in Germany. What's the requirement in Texas? You know how to turn the ignition key and that's proof positive you know how to drive?
Scary.
We need to bring back driver's ed. There is no excuse for not teaching our children the basics of survival in the modern world - and driving, like it or not, is one of the unavoidables of living in the US.
Almost end of rant.
Instead of making life difficult for legal aliens and tourists, the US ought to be doing something about the 20million plus folks living in the US illegally. They can't get driver's licenses or insurance...and because they are at the bottom of the economic tottem pole, often drive cars which shouldn't be on the road at any speed.
OK, end of rant.
(
 
For what it's worth interstate highways are by far the safest roads one can drive on in the US, even though they are also the fastest. The same is true in Germany for Autobahns, but their death rate per mile traveled is less than ours. So, in spite of having unlimited speeds on much of the Autobahn, it is safer there than here. That says a lot for the effectiveness of both driver training and lane discipline (not passing on the right, etc.).

Some years ago I drove from Strasbourg into Germany and up to Amsterdam. Most of that journey was on the Autobahn in an old Citroen Dyane 6. It had a 602cc flat twin, 28 hp, top speed of 110 kph (68 mph). I just stayed in the right lane and had no trouble. The car ended out being shipped to the US where I had to pay a lot more attention to safe driving on freeways and interstates, even with the then 55 mph limit. The difference was that Germans don't mess with slow traffic on the right, while here I would regularly get tailgated by someone who wouldn't stay in the fast lane.

I'd love to see a nice 100 mph limit here on rural interstates with strict fines for tailgating, passing on the right, etc., as both safety and convenience would benfit.
 
More Statistics

From the Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) website
In 2006, an estimated 17,602 people died in alcohol-related traffic crashes—an average of one every 30 minutes. These deaths constitute 41 percent of the 42,642 total traffic fatalities. Of these, an estimated 13,470 involved a driver with an illegal BAC (.08 or greater).

Alcohol-related crashes in the United States cost the public an estimated $114.3 billion in 2000, including $51.1 billion in monetary costs and an estimated $63.2 billion in quality of life losses. People other than the drinking driver paid $71.6 billion of the alcohol-related crash bill, which is 63 percent of the total cost of these crashes.

In 2002, 2.3% of Americans 18 and older surveyed reported alcohol-impaired driving, including 3% of 18-20 year olds and 4.1% of 21-34 year olds.
 
Thank you everyone

for all your concern. I am thankful I am all right. Sore knee and a bruise on my forehead, but other than that all right. A real good friend of mine is an attorny and she said that she will help me if need be. Also unfortuneatly the red bird I have is back in Minnesota at my dad's place. I'm going to end up getting my 1961 Falcon, that I have here in AZ with me, going. As I said, I would post some pics of my car after. Here they are.

4-10-2008-18-28-4--countryford.jpg
 
Though I've never been a real Ford guy (grew up in a GM worker's household), what an absolute shame. But, thanks to the way they built 'em then, you were spared!!! Hopefully it all works out in the end and your baby is back on the road!

BTW, Panthera, he's been behind the wheel and is planning on driving to school sometime next year.... as a 17-year-old, fully-licensed sophomore!

Somethin' 'bout this just ain't right!

Chuck
 
That's a real shame...The damage doesn't look all that bad. Have you gotten an estimate from a body shop yet?

My Grandfather was a body shop mechanic, and he had this huge hydraulic press thing he would put on the cars to straighten the frames. He would bring a suprising amount of cars "back from the grave" that many people condemned to the scrapyard for bent frames. IIRC, I remember him calling it the "Crash Puller"

Not sure how many body shops would still have a machine such as this to even be able to perform this act, but straightening frame rails, especially in the front was not a hard job...just a long process because it involved removing everything from the engine compartment before the car could be placed on the machine.

If I were you, I would buy the car back as salvage from the insurance company, and if it cannot be repaired easily in your area, at least sell it on E-bay to another Ford fanatic that may be able to repair it, or at least, part it out instead of letting it go to the Krusher...there's still a lot of tood stuff on that ride, and I imagine the engine is even still strong!
 
Unfortuneatly

I was driving in a bus/bike lane, trying to bypass traffic, about to approach a turn lane (wasn't quite at the turn lane). Thats when the other driver crossed in front of traffic (which was letting him through since they were stopped because of a red light.) So I came down this bike/bus lane alongside stopped traffic, when this truck pulled out in front of me. So since legally I wasn't supposed to be in the bike/ bus lane I got a citation for driving in a bike lane. So I'm 50% at fault for driving where I wasn't supposed to be. So I highly doubt his insurance will pay for my car (but still haven't received a final word from them). And since I only had liability insurance, mine wont pay for my car either.

Since the frame is bent on it, and insurance probably won't cover it, and I don't have the money to get it fixed, so I doubt I'll get anything done with it. I don't have the place to park a wrecked car either. ( I wish I did). I'll end up just giving it to the towing company for the towing fee and storage fee.
 
Justin

That sucks - his fault, your fault, whatever. I am glad you weren't seriously hurt.
Funny how much our machines mean to us. I've got acquaintances who really believe in astrology but who think I'm a nutcase for hanging on to my KM-3 mixer...it's older than I am even!

Keep us up to date on the Falcon. Now that is a beautiful argument that utility and beauty are not mutually exclusive!
 
Falcons . . .

It's funny that the Falcon pretty much gets no respect, when the much venerated early Mustangs were nothing other than restyled Falcons. That's a plus though, in that there are lots of parts available for Mustangs that should fit a Falcon too.

The Falcon 144 and 170 cubic inch six cylinder engines were new and designed especially for the Falcon using Ford's fairly advanced lightweight iron casting techniques. So, they were intended to be lightweight and economical from the start, not just slightly re-hashed versions of older sixes designed for much heavier cars and trucks. My dad once had an early Econoline with the 144 and manual trans which seemed to do quite well.

It's sad to see any good old car be written off, but between the Torino and Falcon I'd bet that the Falcon is in many ways a better car for today's driving conditions and $4.00/gal fuel. What model and bodystyle is it? Maybe we can have pic when you get it running!
 
I agree that the Falcon could very well be a more desirable vehicle from a collector's standpoint. The Torino for sure provided a much more comfortable environment over all, had more power and better handling than the Falcon, but the Falcon will still be fun to drive. Any Falcon built before 1966 or so manages to turn my head. A Torino not so much.

A local roofing company uses a fleet of early 60's Rancheros. How fun for the owner of that company to find and restore these vehicles and write off the cost of doing so. Nice arrangement and it keeps these cute little workhorses on the road for our viewing pleasure.
 
early Mustangs were nothing other than restyled Falcons

This is the absolute truth, but so many people will not believe it.

They repeated this again by morphing the Pinto into the Mustang II, and the Fairmont into the later Mustang.

BTW, I owned a '62 Falcon in the early 70s. It was rusted and worn but it saved my butt when I blew up the engine on my pricy Corvair and lacked the funds to fix it.
 
The Falcon,

like the Dart and Valiant should never have gone out of production. Ford and Chrysler really lost it when they stopped making high-quality small cars.
I don't like Ford's corporate policies. They caved to the Christianists on gay rights and they took blacks out of their advertising in Poland (that one cost them German government contracts). But the "real" Mustang, not the shit they did with those pregnant cows later on, was one of the neatest cars of all times. Like it's mother, the Falcon.
Lee Iaccoca wrote extensively about this in his first autobiography, in case anybody wants to look it up. The Mustang was pretty much put together with off-the-shelf parts from the Falcon and other Ford products.
Which has a lot to do with why they got it pretty much right from the very git-go, instead of the usual teething problems.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top