I've been eying this Speed Queen on Craigslist and am about to succumb to buying it.
Thanks to Laundress and some of you others I am beginning to get a handle on the McGraw-Edison/Raytheon/Amana/Speed Queen/Goodman/Alliance soap opera (or at least think I am.
last year I acquired a Goodman built Amana washer. It was the TOL 3-speed model with the 710 rpm spin, compared to the 640 rpm for the two speed Amana's. I absolutely loved it, for the two weeks it worked.
It held a ton of clothes, had great turnover, spun quietly with very little vibration, and the clothes came out of the spin quite dry. However, apparently, the triple lip seal had been leaking water into the transmission and it locked up permanently, burned up the belt and stunk up the house. I reluctantly trashed it instead of buying a new transmission and bearing. A mistake on my part.
So, does the Speed Queen in this picture use a different seal than did Goodman? In looking at a schematic of the Speed Queen, the components look almost identical as those of the Amana. So is Alliance using Goodman's poorly designed seal which will most likely cause transmission failure down the road?
In the close up of the Alliance manufacture's label (see link below), it indicates the machine is only an 18 pounder. The Goodman-Amana I had stated it had a 3.3 cu ft tub, and it certainly looked larger than other 18 lb machines I have had. So is Alliance, for some reason, using smaller tubs than the Goodman Amana?
Does anyone know about the spin speed of the Speed Queen versus that of the Goodman/Amana? If the tub is smaller and the spin speed is less I can't see any reason to go with the Alliance version of the machine and will just wait until I find another Goodman built unit (and hope I don't have seal leakage again.)
Thanks to Laundress and some of you others I am beginning to get a handle on the McGraw-Edison/Raytheon/Amana/Speed Queen/Goodman/Alliance soap opera (or at least think I am.

last year I acquired a Goodman built Amana washer. It was the TOL 3-speed model with the 710 rpm spin, compared to the 640 rpm for the two speed Amana's. I absolutely loved it, for the two weeks it worked.
It held a ton of clothes, had great turnover, spun quietly with very little vibration, and the clothes came out of the spin quite dry. However, apparently, the triple lip seal had been leaking water into the transmission and it locked up permanently, burned up the belt and stunk up the house. I reluctantly trashed it instead of buying a new transmission and bearing. A mistake on my part.
So, does the Speed Queen in this picture use a different seal than did Goodman? In looking at a schematic of the Speed Queen, the components look almost identical as those of the Amana. So is Alliance using Goodman's poorly designed seal which will most likely cause transmission failure down the road?
In the close up of the Alliance manufacture's label (see link below), it indicates the machine is only an 18 pounder. The Goodman-Amana I had stated it had a 3.3 cu ft tub, and it certainly looked larger than other 18 lb machines I have had. So is Alliance, for some reason, using smaller tubs than the Goodman Amana?
Does anyone know about the spin speed of the Speed Queen versus that of the Goodman/Amana? If the tub is smaller and the spin speed is less I can't see any reason to go with the Alliance version of the machine and will just wait until I find another Goodman built unit (and hope I don't have seal leakage again.)