hoover1100
Well-known member
Oh yeah...reliability
Well I would have said a front loader is a more simple design, but I think that depends on what you're used to. I could open up a front loader and be relatively comfortable with what everything is and where everything is, stick a top loader in front of me and I wouldn't have a clue!
I think it's fair to say, with the exception of Miele, quality has dropped accross the board, but so has cost. Some modern machines may be expensive, but only because of their modern styling, millions of buttons and lights, pretty colours and claimed features and benefits. As a result of this, their percieved value to the consumer is higher. Take a machine like that and make it to Miele standards and it would cost a small fourtune, as early automatics did.
I guess your average "shredmore" will last a fair bit longer than some of these new designs, but the are essentially 27 year old machines inside right? A front loader that was designed 27 years ago would last longer than most modern designed ones too.
The finger of blame is often pointed at the use of increased use of plastics and modern electronic controls. If plastics of good enough quality are used, they can often replace many aspects of a machine that were previously metal with no consequences. Early electronic machines from the 70s/80 and those of quality such as Miele do last as long as your average mechanical timer, it's simply down to quality of parts, good design and good quality control, these are often overlooked in favour of producing a cheaper machine today. The manufacturer is not necessarily to blame, as they are only producing what the consumers *think* they want, as most have little to no idea of the build quality and longevity of the products they buy, and often just don't care.
Matt
Well I would have said a front loader is a more simple design, but I think that depends on what you're used to. I could open up a front loader and be relatively comfortable with what everything is and where everything is, stick a top loader in front of me and I wouldn't have a clue!
I think it's fair to say, with the exception of Miele, quality has dropped accross the board, but so has cost. Some modern machines may be expensive, but only because of their modern styling, millions of buttons and lights, pretty colours and claimed features and benefits. As a result of this, their percieved value to the consumer is higher. Take a machine like that and make it to Miele standards and it would cost a small fourtune, as early automatics did.
I guess your average "shredmore" will last a fair bit longer than some of these new designs, but the are essentially 27 year old machines inside right? A front loader that was designed 27 years ago would last longer than most modern designed ones too.
The finger of blame is often pointed at the use of increased use of plastics and modern electronic controls. If plastics of good enough quality are used, they can often replace many aspects of a machine that were previously metal with no consequences. Early electronic machines from the 70s/80 and those of quality such as Miele do last as long as your average mechanical timer, it's simply down to quality of parts, good design and good quality control, these are often overlooked in favour of producing a cheaper machine today. The manufacturer is not necessarily to blame, as they are only producing what the consumers *think* they want, as most have little to no idea of the build quality and longevity of the products they buy, and often just don't care.
Matt