Coming Eventually, the New and "Improved" Super Forum

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

I like Louis's suggestion about a separate group (like a

That sounds like a great idea. Who will step forward to start one? I think Robert made it pretty clear that he wasn't interested in more work BUT I have a feeling that a separate group would probably get a good turn out. I just wouldn't call it anything but what it is. Automatic Washer.org was named as such, I assume, because it was about vintage automatic washers and the like; not politics, sex, or religion. Everything has it's place, and anyone who knows me knows that when in the proper setting I can verbally spar with the best sex pig! :-) But you will not see me do it in this forum. Not the place.

Rapunzel writes... "A number of well-regarded, long-term members are amongst those who are sensitive and, it seems, more easily offended."

Olav, I'm not sure who you are thinking about, but let me ask you: When you call someone a racist with no cause or with no knowledge of that person, and the target of the accusation becomes offended, is the target being sensitive or easily offended? This is only a single example so no flames please. Let's face it... all of this bull$hit has come about because of one megalomaniacal, proselytizing, dramatic and, dare I say, psychopathic "wing nut" who wouldn't recognize a two by four if it was swung into his forehead. This is such a waste of time, energy and bandwidth that it just baffles me. I'm only taking the time to read through all of this post because I care about this site, and want to have my voice heard as we were asked for our opinions before changes were made.

I guess I just feel it's time to call it like I see it. I've always enjoyed this site, but am having a hard time seeing what it's becoming.

With much respect,
Rich
 
I am in 100 percent agreement with you Rich, but the problem is that one or two nut jobs screw it up for everybody. Finally they will get banned, or leave, then another one joins up and start trouble again. I really don't believe these people even own, or have much interest in any vintage appliances. It seems that they only want a "captive audience" to vent their endless frustrations and anger at. I know they have chased some other members out of here with the endless ranting and raving. I still think the only permanent solution is to keep the forums more on topic. I remember one person even tried to ruin a "Happy Thanksgiving" thread by posting something nasty on it. So how can anyone really keep someone from posting something offensive on any topic, if that person can find a way to "inject poison" into a thread about a simple holiday like Thanksgiving? (It's about eating, right???) lol!!
 
The "other washer"site

WOW look at that a whopping 44 post during the entire year that is really a "HOT" site is is not!
 
I like the site the way it is, but whatever Robert wants to do is fine. I'm just happy that the site is here. Thanks, Robert.
 
Me next,

I rarely post, but constantly follow all three forums. I've learned a lot from everyone here. Lots of very interesting, articulate, funny, knowledgeable, and sometimes opinionated(to say it nicely) people. I'm not going to debate anyone's ideas, they're pretty good for the most part, and I could live with them. So here goes with my suggestions.

1. Stay with the three forum set-up.

I think it's pretty good and just needs some tweaking to clearly define what does and does not fly in in each one. The "hot button" issues should be clearly spelled out as to what is acceptable and what is not. Robert to decide with no debate. At this point, it is still his site.

2. Specific rules for posting or starting a thread should be developed, and made to be "clickable" for agreement to and adherence to in order to continue past the "preview" stage and continue on to post.
Consequences for violation should be clearly spelled out as part of this.

3. Leave "report" feature in place as is. It's new and may need tweaked, but may become unnecessay after a while.

4. Add a "Donate" button to the main page.

This would allow anyone to give to the cause and help Robert defray the cost of the site. This also allows Robert to be in complete ownership and control of the site.
If part of the site were to become "pay to play", some who pay may think of it as entitlement and implied ownership to say what they will with no regrets as to who it hurts or offends. This ultimately affects the overall tone and intent of the site whether you can or can't see what's said. Let's face it,people talk.

Anyway, these are some of my thoughts. I will support whatever decisions are made.
Robert, you do us proud.

Bill
 
So how can anyone really keep someone from posting something offensive on any topic, if that person can find a way to "inject poison" into a thread about a simple holiday like Thanksgiving?

Hey Rick,

I'm sure Rich won't mind if I field this one. First time they post, warn 'em. Second time, banish them into oblivion. It really is that simple.

As far as the rest of the discussion, I see an awful lot of support for banning politics, sex, and religion topics from the super forum. I fully agree with the hopes that the forum will remain the same with, maybe, minor changes.

I also see support for a separate forum somewhere else for those discussions. Rich even called for someone to start one.

Here it is! Robert- this is in no disrespect to you in any way, shape or form. If you find, or any other member finds, that it's not something that should exist for a good reason, I'll remove it. I have no attachment to it and only started it because a few suggested it, and I see it as a means to an end. My only connection to it is that I started it. Nothing else.

Probably will be sorry soon,
Chuck

http://groups.google.com/group/politics-sex-religion/topics
 
Bill What is to stop those that pay to put in the kitty good

Then figure I "paid for the site" so I have the right to say what ever I want, and to cut everyone to threads. It will happen here.
 
look look at th post above yours according to his profile he

Wow, born the week I graduated high school. Holy crap, I feel a thousand years old now!
 
It's your site...

Robert, and would pay a small fee to participate (I'm still waiting with bated breath for your next DVD of the fabulous Apex!) I like the idea of re-stating the purpose of SUPER forum. I hope you continue to offer this web site, it is very enjoyable overall
Thanks!
 
First of all Rich thank you for creating that group for aw members but on Google's servers. LOL I love your first post, naughty :-) I think it could be really fun, ugh I can only imagine.

I appreciate everyone's support and open to even helping with the costs of running the site. I really have no plan on charging to use any of the three forums, I want to keep it free to read and post for everyone. My initial idea in post #1 of this thread above was simply to charge for the Super Forum to help keep the 18 crowd out and to cover the server costs.

At some point to raise money maybe I can offer special features (such as edit and delete your own posts, etc, etc.) and the use of those extra features could be fee based on an upgraded membership. But for now lets just keep everything open and free.
 
'Second time, banish them into oblivion.'

I may be reading things wrong and I am certainly not speaking for or on Robert's behalf.

It is my impression that Robert doesn't mind the discussions on the Super Forum. Based on what he has written so far, he also doesn't strike me as someone who enjoys censoring or banishing people for their personal views or how they express them. His issue appears to be with people who consistently complain to him directly about the posts they choose to read in the SF, with the expectation that he puts in extra time (and money) to moderate that forum according to their personal wishes and opinions. If I am incorrect on that point I apologize, but that is how I read it.

Wasn't the Super Forum created so that people can have a space on this site, where they are able to connect and share views and ideas freely? In addition to (vintage) appliances, launddry additives and small appliances.

To me it seems obvious that the controversy isn't so much about what and how issues are being discussed in the SF, but that some people persistently make a big deal when their personal expectations aren't being met or validated.

On that note I second Gansky's response and will leave it at that.

rapunzel
 
Um, Rapunzel...

"It is my impression that Robert doesn't mind the discussions on the Super Forum."

Can you tell me how you got that out of this (quote from the first post in this thread, by Robert)?

"...many times I roll my eyes reading Super Forum threads (the ones I actually read) thinking that they are inappropriate for the general content of this website. Also some of the posts not only are inappropriate for the website, but are inappropriate for the children that might have an interest in washers and stumble upon the site and we do want to encourage the younger generations to enjoy this hobby as well. I would just hate to think that a 14 year old who loves washers as much as I do would have his parents say he was not allowed to read this website because of stuff on the Super Forum."
 
Hold on Sandy, I would say that Olav is pretty observant. It does get really tiresome to get emails from people complaining about what they are reading (and I get them more than most would ever imagine) when they could simply click away and ignore. While I might not have said that directly I've mentioned it before in other posts.

That's not 100% of the problem, but it certainly is a factor. But really it goes along with the terrority and I realize that. And Olav I don't generally mind making changes to the system, programming can be really fun to nerds like myself. It's sort of like putting a puzzle together and I love the challenge. I don't ever do it because I feel like people are "expecting it", I do in spurts when I have the time and feel like it. Of course right now I have GE leaking oil all over the basement floor, the '56 Hotpoint timer is suddenly acting up, as of this week the timer in the KitchenAid dishwasher is only incrementing once every three increments and the WO-65 water valve started leaking last weekend. Everything at once, ugh! All can be fixed, but no time for coding now. And I'm working on restoring the '66 Lady Kenmore that Fred found while I was in out of town. ***back of hand on forehead***.

If we ever wanted to send you a donation for the hell of it, would that be cool?
I'll think about that Vern, thank you.
 
Robert:

Well, now you've got me confused. Are the sentences I've just quoted (which seem pretty clearly stated) representative of your thinking, or is this about the complaints you receive off-list?
 
Are the sentences I've just quoted (which seem pretty clearly stated) representative of your thinking
Absolutely its representative of my thinking, but those email complaints can be a lot to handle as well.
 
Okay, I take that back and stand corrected

I should have gone back to re-read what exactly he said - my bad.

Instead of imposing restrictions, Robert is trying to implement a solution that may accomodate everyone and settle this matter once and for all - kudos to him.

Still, I don't think that the vast majority of SF posts are all that controversial. I have yet to come accross a post that uses cusswords and overt sexual content. Than again, I may not be as easily affected by what I read as other people.

rapunzel
 
I am very disappointed, that we have, to have, this discussion or cause Robert to think he needs to write/rewrite code. I always admit i enjoy our debates, however i am regretful when it turns ugly and tend to leave the thread alone. We are an opinionated Lot, and sometimes have a spill of emotion. I am in favor of whatever Robert & Fred decide. It pained me to read the thread were Robert mentioned "he had guest's and had not seen, a particular post, that was in debate. I am thinking Robert did not create this site to be a cyber playground referee. Lets "reset" our manners, and look forward to the "donate now" button. alr2903
 
Of course right now I have GE leaking oil all over the basement floor, the '56 Hotpoint timer is suddenly acting up, as of this week the timer in the KitchenAid dishwasher is only incrementing once every three increments and the WO-65 water valve started leaking last weekend. Everything at once, ugh!

Hey Robert, I think my partner can match that. The power has been off at our house due to storms for the last 3 day, today my partner went off to work, and ran into six road closures and detours on the way. An hour later he collapsed in sudden and overwhelming pain on his left side, 911 was called, he was rushed to the hospital. He had passed (we hope) a kidney stone. And when we finally got home tonight?

A jury duty summons for him in our mailbox.

Right now we don't know whether to laugh or cry, this day has been incredible.
 
I'd like to start by talking a bit about what I think this site means to people, and why it's so successful.

I've been reading this bunch of people since early when the site was at the Yahoo! groups, and at that point I went back and read all the posts, which took me a few days. We've moved then to ClassicAppliances.com and later the name got changed to AutomaticWasher.org.

I could tell you many many stories about what we went thru. I am willing to bet that y'all could also tell me many more that I've missed during the periods when I had no time at all to read this site. I always come back though, it's basically the very first site I read when I have time, then if I have more time I read the others, which is rare these days.

Anyway, we went through many things together. People lying and trying to scam nice people here, outrageous claims flying, you think about something, it probably happened to some of us here too.

That, to me, is the entire difference between this website and the others: we bonded. We come here and have friends, not just people across the intartubes which you can flame and tease and be nasty to.

You want a story? "When I was a little kid, in Saint Olaf, MN..." (or, if you don't like that, "Picture, Sicily, 1934...") Anyway, a couple of years ago, a regular poster here posted a link to a TED Talk with Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor (who suffered a massive stroke, survived it and recovered to a degree that many would say "complete"). I credit AW.org, the poster and Dr. Taylor with the fact that my SO is alive and well today -- a few months (maybe less than a couple of months, in fact) after that post, my SO suffered a stroke and because of AW.org and Dr. Taylor, I was able to not only recognize what was going on at the very first few minutes, but also to know that I had to call 911. It also gave us strength and courage to go through a hard recovery. Today, he's recovered completely and no one can even tell he ever had any trouble and even friends who know him for years sometimes say it seems like it was just a bad dream. That post was definitely not "on topic" and I would have never seen it otherwise, it's that simple.

That to me, in a very small nutshell, is AW.org. We're not just talking about on-topic stuff, we make friends, we talk about a variety of things. Incredibly, that is also what helps people who collect the incredibly rare appliances -- you can bet your hard earned money that if it wasn't for this sense of camaraderie and community here, you wouldn't see anyone taking any of their valuable time to help each other and even send incredibly rare parts or entire machines as gifts to each other.

I feel that one can only have that sense of community when people behave like people, instead of being forced into a sanitized state. It doesn't take long to find out who are the people who spin the most incredible stories and lie through their teeth the way the site operates now.

Let me try and address some of the things that seem to be worrying people, please bear with me.

The other day I was reading a user guide for a dishwasher from another country. It had lots of verbiage about how dangerous automatic dishwashing detergents are for kids and how you need to lock the controls and the door so kids will not "accidentally" ingest it. Let me just say that I think the word "accidentally" is very ill chosen -- it's not that you suddenly turned your back for half a second and your kid ended up in the Emergency Room. It's that you're not paying enough attention to your kids and you're not teaching them what they need to learn to succeed in life.

I have a dog -- the first three times I was loading the dishwasher when she was a puppy, she got near the machine and tried to sniff/lick stuff, I gently blocked her and told her "no". Previously, when we lived in large homes with lots of students, one of our housemates had a cat, we trained him the same way, no problem ever. You don't need to spank your kids or pets so they'll learn, you can be gentle. They'll learn what you consider acceptable very quickly if you treat them as intelligent beings. I can't believe that people need to lock the dishwasher to avoid landing their way more intelligent human kids in the ER. I have never had any troubles with pets and/or children jumping into the washer or dryer, and I don't personally know anyone with that problem with babies/children either. They teach their kids and then it's no problem if a washer or dryer is open.

So, I think that if anyone has a problem with their kids reading this website, it's their problem to deal with, they need to teach their kids and pay attention to what they are doing. They can also buy and use software to limit what their kids are looking at on the internet. Maybe all we need to do is mark the Super Forum as Adult oriented and let their software block it if they care.

Also, please think very seriously when was the first time you were introduced to swear words and subjects such as sex. I am willing to bet that for the majority here, you heard and repeated your first swear words when you were under 7 and sex must have registered on your radar screen before you were 10.

I don't feel like we are supposed to be baby sitting kids on the internet on the off-chance someone has not heard a swear word or about sex until they are 21 or so. That's their parents' job.

Do I come here to listen to the sex talk or talk about it? No. But I don't flinch and ran away either. Do I need to see posts peppered with sex and swear words? Hell, no. But again, I'm a grown up, I can deal with it and be polite about it if it's too much. I don't need a flame war about this, and they seem to be fairly regular in websites that have "strict rules" about subjects and language.

As a matter of fact, websites with "strict rules" seem to spend way more time flaming about people who supposedly broke the rules than on-topic subjects.

Remember also, that this is the internet. No one owes you anything. Don't expect to come here and find everything the way you like it so you can relax and get away from the world. Go do something that guarantees you that if you must, but don't come here talking about "think of the children" any time something gets out of whack. If you are too easily shocked, you should get out more, or at least stay away from the internet, where people from all over the world, with every race, religion and political view can participate.

Also, don't come to us pleading the case of etiquette: if you have actually bothered to read Ms. Manners for even 5 minutes, I find it terribly hard to believe that she has not gotten thru to you that "Etiquette is not about never being offended or offending anyone -- quite the contrary, etiquette is all about deeply offending someone in front of everyone but in a polite way which may include plausible deniability."

You don't want to talk about sex, then don't. Be the change you want to see in the world, like Ghandi said. Behave like an adult, if the thread has a subject that you know you don't like, don't read it. Say you don't like toploaders or frontloaders -- avoid the thread, there's absolutely no real good reason to come to the thread to bitch about and repeat for the billionth time that you think they're are worthless and the tool and work of the devil. Really. Trust me on that one, we've heard it before, probably from you. We're not dumb, we understood you the very first freaking time.

Also, I find the argument that such and such magazine/newspaper/whatever can't publish about our website because we're too racy/foulmouth etc to be disingenuous at best. One can find such things all over the internets without even trying, kids can find more stuff on Youtube than here, no one seems to be too worried about Youtube. Sometime ago, for example, someone said something racy and a few people who I will charitably think were well intentioned but naive instead of sophisticated, pointed out that such subjects were for websites A, B and C. Well, no one has ever accused me of being a prude or misinformed about sex, but wouldn't you know it, the people who were so worried about the kids taught me about 3 websites I had never heard of before and that were too racy for this vanilla guy. Talk about making it easy for kids to find info which was worse than what was posted here. The fact that some publication has to pretend to be shy or naive and not publish about us may explain why they are loosing readership when it's now so easy to find out what one wants on the intartubes by oneself -- previously, I fear that the reason they wouldn't publish such things is that one side of their publishing house could pretend to be so virtuous when the other branches of their business were busy publishing books and magazines like Cosmo, teaching you all about how to be thin and beautiful and how to learn these 2 dozen new sex positions and what the other people like in bed. Riiiiiight. Very virtuous, as if I couldn't read the name of the publishers on the covers.

It also bothers me how everything needs to be so clean and disinfected, so very Pleasantville, with Main St and Lovers Lane, where everyone is white, middle class, straight with 2.5 kids, a dog and a cat. No one has a bathroom and, if they do, their's no toilet in it. Two single beds on the couple's bedroom, yeah, right.

It's like telling us that we need to be nice so the straight people will show up and stay. Well, if straight people show up and are so ill adjusted that they can't deal with some gayness, do we really want them here? It's like telling us that they accept that we're black but they'll only interact with us if we use enough makeup to appear to be white. We have plenty of nice straight people here that seem to have no problems with the site. The ones that would have a problem with some gayness, well, we're here, we're queer, get used to it. They can't be serious collectors or seriously interested in appliances if they let something like gender, sexual orientation, nationality, rare, religion or politics get in their way.

What would I like to see less of in the site? Ebay/Craigslist crap -- I seriously can't believe anyone who is searching for something has not been looking there already. If you know who specifically has been looking for something, email them, but the constant "heads up!" is silly beyond words. I like it when people post stuff to snark about how someone is posting about a GE dishwasher and it's actually a Whirlpool self-cleaning oven, it's not that I don't have a sense of humor. But really, do you honestly think that you'll be the only one that saw that special dryer near Anytown, USA?

I would like to see less stupidity -- I lost count of the times here that someone that is saying something that makes sense and I agree wholehearted with says it in such a way that even I get repulsed by the tone and words. People, get a clue, if you sound like an idiot, you are actually advertising for the opposition instead of your camp. In fact, I sometimes think some of the folks here *do* work for the opposition and want us to feel so bad about gay rights and/or political platforms that we'll switch sides.

As for the kids -- I don't mind them being here, it's fun to see them grow up and contribute. But their parents are supposed to supervise them, not me. They are welcome here, but parents, take note, one of the few things that Americans and America gets wrong, or fails to get at all, is that parents should not be raising kids, parents should be raising adults -- if you are not educating your kids, supervising them, guiding them to become reasonably well adjusted in society and contributing members to society, you are failing at your job. It's your job to make sure that your kids are learning about safe sex either from you, in the safety of your home, or from some reputable instructors in some good school. Not from misinformed "friends" on the street.

To the folks that are so bent out of shape about paying for the site. I don't care where you live, if you have a credit card, you don't even need to sign up to PayPal, you can have PayPal transfer your 12 bucks per year to this site. If you can't afford a buck a month, please let us know -- I would be more than glad to drop a chunk of change here to be offered as some form of scholarship to the folks who are struggling with this. No, I'm not rich, but my folks give me a chunk of money every year for my birthday and I'd more than gladly give the money to Robert and consider this community my birthday gift.

Robert, if you want the least programing load on your back, just list either the super forum or the entire site as "Possible Adult Subjects" and let the parents decide. I'm willing to bet that any parent that is cool with the kids' interest will already be cool enough to not care about the label. All the other parents are probably already forbidding time by the computer anyway, not worth worrying about it.

And finally, thank you Robert and all here for everything. This place makes my day better even when heavy stuff goes on here, it feels to me that I'm among friends/family.

Peace all,
-- Paulo.

PS: just occurred to me that I forgot to touch another important point. History shows that on the Internet (at least since Usenet newsgroups, and certainly the websites), every time someone says "this subject is not on-topic for this forum, we should create another one for it", it will be lather/rinse/repeat. Say you have a forum for classic appliances and people start discussing the newest thing some company released last week. Eventually enough people decide it's annoying and we create a forum for modern stuff. Then enough people start asking about detergents etc or what they found out last week and we have a forum for chit-chat. Then the subjects turn to the last cancer treatment, or someone's pet or lover is sick or dead, then people start talking about religion, politics and sex and we create another forum for hot topics. Sooner or later, the hot topics forum will start complaining about the BDSM vs. vanilla sex or swear words etc. That's why we have 3 forums now. We'll need 6 soon and it won't stop there. Maybe we should tell everyone to get a free newsreader (if I remember correctly Outlook Express has a built-in one and there are plenty of better newsreaders out there for free) and let this be Robert's website and use alt.automaticwasher.vintage, alt.automaticwasher.modern, alt.automaticwasher.chitchat, alt.automaticwasher.hottopics etc and let people use the built-in kill-files and threading to deal with it on their own, instead of forcing Robert to accommodate everyone. I warn all that have never been to a Usenet newsgroup though, we'll be seeing a lot of spam and people driving by to let us know we're perverts for liking appliances, which is one of the reasons this site was created, I think. ;-)
 
"I notice by your profile, that you don't even own

Believe it or not, there seem to be many great contributors to this site who don't presently own vintage washers or other appliances. I have a great love of all the vintage machines, and own several vintage small appliances, that's as close as I can get at the moment. My non vintage units will be replaced with something more to my liking when they die or become irreparable. And, there are some antique car sites that state "you don't need to own a _______ to become a member of the group". I'm guessing that the majority of non-vintage owners are here for love of these great old machines, and other vintage delights. If you ask or tell me to not bring up unsavory way off topic subjects, I have no problem with it. Undeniably, there are people with little or no interest in the real reason for this site who love to stir the pot. I won't be one of them.

One site I'm a member of had one man say "this is a site for tube amplifiers only", and was quickly corrected by another man who said, "read the description, this site is for all of the products made before the new companies removal of the original designs by the parent company" or something along that line. If Robert would prefer vintage washers etc. owners only, I'm sure he would inform us. It has always amused me when someone tells you with authority what so and so's group is, don't speak for them unless you know for a fact that it is an owners only site. But, there are owners of stellar collections who have been banned for being infinitely worse mannered than the rabble rousers.

My suggestion is to clearly state in the site description that flaming, or other troublemaking is not tolerated in any form, and truly horrifying subject matter won't be tolerated either. Any gay related subject matter mostly consists of tastefully presented ideas and arguements. No one seems to really have a problem with that, just the incredible hatred and cruelty that seems to erupt all too frequently.
 
Paulo, that's an amazing story about your SO. I don't remember if I was the one who posted the Taylor link to AW, but I do remember forwarding it to other forums and friends.

I agree with almost all of what you said, except for part about posting Craigslist "heads-ups". As far as I know there's no way to do a global search on CL, and searching the ads for every city for interesting appliances would take an hour every day for a fast reader, and maybe twice as much time for a slow reader. Fortunately traffic in the Imperial Forum is slow enough where, at least IMO, the CL postings aren't a problem.
 
112561,

I've been through the same thing as have several other members.

It's just some peoples' way of saying: "You're not one of us, you don't belong".

Which is total nonsense. Robert determines who belongs or not and he has clearly welcomed people here who share his joy and delight in vintage appliances, not necessarily his incredible collection. There are several respected, established members of this site who know my real life name and contact info, several have exchanged vintage parts/manuals and photos with me through the years. In short, the genuineness of my collections has been proved, yet you will find the same charge leveled against me right here in this thread.
Best to ignore it, the rest of us are really happy you're here.

Paulo,
I wish I could write as well as you do. I agree with you, completely.
 
Paulo, well put and also with minor exceptions I do agree with you but the thing is as I see it, and I personally do like the political and or racy stuff, is those zealots, scratched record people,"right fighters" call em what you will, who never ever seem to know when it's time to STFU as we were just given an example of the other day.
 
Panthera, Paolo, Petek

Right on!! I don't doubt for a minute most of the people here and on this thread are big time appliance lovers. There are instances when it is best to back off, myself included, when too much gets said. I've been reading this site for three years, and really don't want to be on the outside looking in, I'm probably not going to post a great deal though. I love looking at the restorations, the collections, and get a vicarious thrill every time one of you rescues a heart stopping treasure from a store or scrap pile. Ok, this doesn't make me an expert by any means, but I've been savoring appliance ads since I got the 1956 Life magazines when I was in junior high, which lead to piles of other publications from the '50s and '60s. And the appliance ads from the 1950s Geographics. I wish I could have rescued the pink Frigidaire bottom freezer that stank of fish unfortunately, but otherwise looked presentable. Or the 1962ish GE with the swivel out shelves at a local thrift store. Or the turquoise washer at the flea market that I hope got a good home. In the meantime, I'll enjoy yours!
 
Super Should be off limits to anyone under 18

What is the logic behind this? I don't understand the need for such a strong statement and would like more information to better understand your position.

Honestly, what is being discussed that a 12 - 17 year old cannot or should not be reading on the Super forum and would require an age restriction? How would someone's true age be validated? If those discussions are taking place, are those topics truly needed on an open and free forum for all the world to read and most to engage in?

Ben
 
Back
Top