hahaha
activists setting fire on wave touch machines in front of electrolux plant. LOL
can you imagine this situation? (of course they won't mind the smoke because it's for a good cause)
Before somebody think i'm extremist, let me put things very clear.
It's very important to protect our environment and as far as I know, ALL THE MANUFACTURERS not only Electrolux try to cause the smallest footprint possible.
BUT...
some things are impossible to be done without causing a footprint. Doing laundry is one of them.
Someday we will have the technology to use much less water AND have amazing results, but now there are only fancy prototypes and millions of dollars being spent. Maybe our grandsons and daughters will be able to do their laundry without water.
unfortunately, in 2009 we reached the limit. Wave touch can perform a good wash and at the same time reduce the footprint.
It uses much less water than top loaders and there's no need to repeat the cycles thousands of times to get the clothes properly rinsed.
But there's even more we can do. now we must remember to use it with responsability. the world would be much better if everybody starts to choose friendly detergents that are more biodegradable than required by law. STPP is good, but it's also bad. i'm sure we all can think twice before using it. It doesn't need to be used on every wash, does it? we don't need to run the machine with a pair of socks inside it, why not wait until we have a full load? hot water is also good. it's excellent! but do we really need to boil all our clothes like noodles every time we wash them? Can't we try to reduce a little bit the temperature? A single load in our homes doing that means nothing, but imagine millions of water boilers and internal heaters in the world reducing 1 degree.
Also, the automaticmania. Ok we don't have the time to change the load and reuse the same wash water, but, can't you try to do that at least once a month? since I started to save the water, i had a HUGE impact on groceries bills. My detergent boxes and bottles last 6x more. I just started it to save the "imported" box of Tide and A&H washing soda John brought me.
A single load we save means a dose of detergent. again, only one means nothing, but imagine millions of people doing the same thing.
The best of all (for us that love to be in front of our loved machines) we can interact much more with them.
Next time you do a load, try to use a bucket and change the load before draining the wash water. If you have more than a machine, it's much easier. just put the drain hose in the drum and let it drain, as I (and many other members) do.
And don't be surprised when the next generation of HE machines come with internal and automatic suds saver containers.
And you? what are your suggestions to help our environment without reducing the washing and rinsing performance?
activists setting fire on wave touch machines in front of electrolux plant. LOL
can you imagine this situation? (of course they won't mind the smoke because it's for a good cause)
Before somebody think i'm extremist, let me put things very clear.
It's very important to protect our environment and as far as I know, ALL THE MANUFACTURERS not only Electrolux try to cause the smallest footprint possible.
BUT...
some things are impossible to be done without causing a footprint. Doing laundry is one of them.
Someday we will have the technology to use much less water AND have amazing results, but now there are only fancy prototypes and millions of dollars being spent. Maybe our grandsons and daughters will be able to do their laundry without water.
unfortunately, in 2009 we reached the limit. Wave touch can perform a good wash and at the same time reduce the footprint.
It uses much less water than top loaders and there's no need to repeat the cycles thousands of times to get the clothes properly rinsed.
But there's even more we can do. now we must remember to use it with responsability. the world would be much better if everybody starts to choose friendly detergents that are more biodegradable than required by law. STPP is good, but it's also bad. i'm sure we all can think twice before using it. It doesn't need to be used on every wash, does it? we don't need to run the machine with a pair of socks inside it, why not wait until we have a full load? hot water is also good. it's excellent! but do we really need to boil all our clothes like noodles every time we wash them? Can't we try to reduce a little bit the temperature? A single load in our homes doing that means nothing, but imagine millions of water boilers and internal heaters in the world reducing 1 degree.
Also, the automaticmania. Ok we don't have the time to change the load and reuse the same wash water, but, can't you try to do that at least once a month? since I started to save the water, i had a HUGE impact on groceries bills. My detergent boxes and bottles last 6x more. I just started it to save the "imported" box of Tide and A&H washing soda John brought me.
A single load we save means a dose of detergent. again, only one means nothing, but imagine millions of people doing the same thing.
The best of all (for us that love to be in front of our loved machines) we can interact much more with them.
Next time you do a load, try to use a bucket and change the load before draining the wash water. If you have more than a machine, it's much easier. just put the drain hose in the drum and let it drain, as I (and many other members) do.
And don't be surprised when the next generation of HE machines come with internal and automatic suds saver containers.
And you? what are your suggestions to help our environment without reducing the washing and rinsing performance?