The energy thread brought up an interesting point...what places more mercury in the environment, using CFL's and disposing of them, or using incandescent lighting?
In short, the question would be a no-brainer, since incandescant lights aren't constructed with mercury. BUT...buring coal emits mercury into the air. Coal-fired power plants produce 50% of the electricity in the USA.
Since a CFL typically consumes 1/4 the amount of power that an incandescant lamp of the same brightness, that is reflected in the amount of coal burned at the power plant to illuminate it, thus less mercury is emitted from the coal plant.
Would I be correct on this thinking? It's worth looking into.
In short, the question would be a no-brainer, since incandescant lights aren't constructed with mercury. BUT...buring coal emits mercury into the air. Coal-fired power plants produce 50% of the electricity in the USA.
Since a CFL typically consumes 1/4 the amount of power that an incandescant lamp of the same brightness, that is reflected in the amount of coal burned at the power plant to illuminate it, thus less mercury is emitted from the coal plant.
Would I be correct on this thinking? It's worth looking into.