I own a similar whirlpool to the AWM 312. It is OK but they have a nasty fault, the drum spider is too lightly built and it is prone to corroding and snapping. You cant get a replacement spider, you have to buy the whole drum at over $350. Śo avoid that one.
I dont really know the later Whirlpool like the 8121 but it looks just like the earlier one with a new dashboard so I would avoid it too. Whirlpools have very long cycles by Australian tastes, too.
I have repaired one of those Bendixes, they are OK but there are no spare parts for that model now. They were made by Philco in Italy, they dont exist any more. (?) The quality is OK but nothing special, prone to rust in the cabinet.
An absolutely terrible machine to work on, access is awful. Avoid.
I would highly recommend the Asko. I own one and have repaired a couple, all older than the one in your photo. The 10505 was a problem model, it was the basic model at the time. If it is not a 10505 (or 10506??) then Id buy it.
(Sorry about the lack of apostrophes - keyboard trouble.)
Chris.
I dont really know the later Whirlpool like the 8121 but it looks just like the earlier one with a new dashboard so I would avoid it too. Whirlpools have very long cycles by Australian tastes, too.
I have repaired one of those Bendixes, they are OK but there are no spare parts for that model now. They were made by Philco in Italy, they dont exist any more. (?) The quality is OK but nothing special, prone to rust in the cabinet.
An absolutely terrible machine to work on, access is awful. Avoid.
I would highly recommend the Asko. I own one and have repaired a couple, all older than the one in your photo. The 10505 was a problem model, it was the basic model at the time. If it is not a 10505 (or 10506??) then Id buy it.
(Sorry about the lack of apostrophes - keyboard trouble.)
Chris.