Hilary on "Love It or List It" - WTH?

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support AutomaticWasher.org:

danemodsandy

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
8,180
Location
The Bramford, Apt. 7-E
I have recently been watching a lot of HGTV, something I never did before, and I find a lot of it entertaining, if a little too focused on the trendy.

But one show leaves me with my jaw on the floor more often than not - Love It or List It - and the reason is design doyenne Hilary Farr.

Time and time and time again, I have watched this woman create a design that is supposed to fix all the issues with someone's house, so that they'll stay in it instead of listing it and moving, only to have her construction crew find some horror issue that makes full execution of her plan impossible.

I've seen one house where the basement didn't get redone because Hilary decreed a design with no support posts, which would have required a huge steel beam that would have eaten something like half the budget. The support post she wanted to get rid of wasn't that big, nor that obtrusive. The homeowner only got his upstairs done as a result.

In another instance, the homeowners wanted their freezing-cold upstairs rendered habitable, their main floor converted to open-plan and their basement converted to studio space for art projects. Hilary's crew started demolition, and found that there were roof/ceiling joist issues upstairs costing a lot of money to correct. The homeowners got two rooms upstairs done, and that was IT - they had to do without everything else they'd asked for. To be fair to Hilary, their budget was small, but they got so little of what they wanted, they listed the house.

The corker came when I saw an episode where the woman said she wanted a bigger bathroom. Hilary gave her one, all right - the homeowner found that one of her bedrooms was disappearing entirely to expand the bath. The homeowner quite rightly pitched a titanic hissy fit, and Hilary was forced to redraft her plans to reinstate the third bedroom, something that must have bothered her tremendously, since she described the rebuilt bedroom as "poky" about 562 times in the remainder of the episode.

I have seen homeowners get into shouting matches with Hilary, call her integrity into question and declare on-camera that they wish to God they'd never let her touch their house.

What gives here? Doesn't the idea of a preliminary structural inspection before the design phase occur to anyone? Why is this woman given access to people's homes and bank accounts without being held accountable for the result? As it is, she spends a lot of time declaring that she's not responsible for what her crew finds, but many issues are ones that a capable inspector would turn up readily.

I'm looking forward to the day someone takes this dreadful woman and HGTV to court, frankly.
 
I am SO glad

that I no longer watch the tv on a regular basis!

I feel much saner and a little smarter for it.

Lawrence/Maytagbear
 
Along Similar Lines

HGTV's Property Brothers is another program where home buyers are (mis)led into purchasing a dilapidated house by the brothers, one a realtor, one a contractor and who appear to be twins, who convince them that the house can be remodeled into their dream home containing all of their "must have" features. 

 

These places are in very bad shape and usually every square foot is in need of serious work.  The clients' "must have" list is always a short one, amounting to at most two rooms to be renovated.  The brothers focus on only the rooms in question and completely transform them but the rest of the house presumably remains uninhabitable.  The clients blow their entire budget on just one project with no money left to finish the rest of the house, and yet somehow they're happy with the circumstances as the program winds up.

 

A half-assed presentation of complete nonsense that should be avoided. 
 
Yeah!

And I LOVE the budgets these people have to work with.

Excuse me waitress? I'll take my reality check now.

Malcolm
 
I'm sure HGTV (or any "reality" show) has insulated itself from lawsuits by having people sign disclaimers, thereby protecting it's bloody arse.
 
A little experience.

I've got 2 degrees in Historic Preservation and historic buildings are my life. I'm rehabilitating a huge 4-family house right now and in any construction project, EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED!!! I planned ahead for massive unforseen problems and padded my budget and schedule accordingly. My project laughed at my plans and went on its merry way regardless.

I had a major unforseen mold problem. I had to spend over $20,000 on remediation, including dry ice blasting. That was just one of the issues. As for bathrooms, I prefer small ones. They're easier to clean! Besides, there are many other rooms in which I'd rather spend my time.

Before starting my project, I did a condition assessment to determine what I had on my hands and come up with a viable plan to address them. Planning can make or break a project.

Dave
 
I agree with all of these comments!

I think they do a lot of things as a rote story line used in each episode to make the shows more "dramatic"... they get the "customers" all wrapped up into getting something new... they have the heartache of the unforeseen challenge... and they always manage to pull out some kind of surprise fix... I also think they have some pretty unrealistic numbers and expectations. Like Dave says, expect the unexpected, reality is that there are almost always hidden issues lurking behind those that you see (and I also agree with you, Dave, big bathrooms to me are too much work and generally wasted space... would rather use room for a nice study or larger bedrooms, etc!). Finally, I had heard that the houses that they redo on the unrealistically tight turnarounds are not of the highest quality, and generally of things with a lot of bling that will have a 'wow' factor on television but may not likely work as well or last so well in reality reality (as opposed to tv reality show!).
 
Polkanut:

"I'm sure HGTV (or any "reality" show) has insulated itself from lawsuits by having people sign disclaimers, thereby protecting it's bloody arse."

Disclaimers don't protect against criminal negligence, and at the rate Hilary's going, I wonder if that point won't be reached soon, if it hasn't already?

Remember, we only see the stuff they choose to air.
 
I like Hillary but,

she is a glorified cleaning lady!!! More than half of the time, her designs, never come to fruition. She renovated a laundry room once by getting rid of a top load washer, and a dryer which were in separate rooms, by replacing them with a front load WP washer and dryer and placing them next to one another!! This is a renovation???
Mike
 
Lawsuits

One question that the lawyers and top executives at any company might consider is how much impact a lawsuit has after all the dust has been settled, and all the money paid. For example, I've heard stories of car companies that ship cars with a huge safety issue that they know about, but, after calculations, figure it'll be cheaper being sued a few times than it will be actually addressing the issue from the start.
 
Back
Top