launderess
Well-known member
Methinks the problem lies with costs versus returns. SQ has not exactly gone the mass merchandise route, selling to big box stores and the like, and that sort of volume is what they will need to move units. Without high sales cost per unit is going to be more than average for the same size machine, however Whirlpool and others have uber-sized front loaders that offer more features for the price. Make no mistake about it, today's consumer is after bells and gimmicks, not a unit that will last the duration. Most consumers simply do not view "major appliance" purchases the same way their parents and or grand-parents did. More likely than not, the washer will be kicked to the curb, family moved and left it behind, etc; long before what long "lifespan" the machine had.
IMHO SQ should have stuck to the earlier version of "homestyle" units, still sold in Canada under "Hubesch". Many of those units were sold to US military bases and are still kicking, despite the abuse.
IMHO SQ should have stuck to the earlier version of "homestyle" units, still sold in Canada under "Hubesch". Many of those units were sold to US military bases and are still kicking, despite the abuse.