How well does Denim handle in your Pulsators..full load

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

OK, here is my 2c worth. I am with frontaloadotmy, I think if we are really going to compare K to F the surgilator gets disqualified. I also believe the str8 and rotoswirl both should be tested since they were both used and will probably give very different results.

Here is my guess. a roto swirl will beat Frigidaire and a Frigidaire will beat a str8 Kenmore.
 
The Results Are In!

Now I have to edit and post the video, which I will try and do tonight, it is going to be a bit time consuming converting it and uploading it to the net, so I can't promise I will have it done tonight, but I will try.

I think both sides we be very surprised at the results. Picking the Surgilator for this test was a wise choice boyz.

The question is----are the jeans to be used in the test brand new (non pre-washed) stiff dark blue denim?
And what size are they?

Steven Riley! It's not nice to ask a girl that question. LOL

Actually the I used three pair of Neal's jeans (33/32) and two pair of my jeans (31/30). I didn't use brand new jeans because I want the test to be like the way I normally do wash and not something that rarely happens. Our jeans last a long time, so its rare that I have any new jeans to wash. Both machines were at or slighlty over capacity with this wash load.

The point here is to see how the two machines perform with the Exact same clothes. It would be interesting to do this test with towles and another with mixed cottens shirts.
 
MY guess is they BOTH kicked major @$$. I know the Surg did a helluva job and the 3 ring kept right up with it.

Just for posterity, I might do 5 pair of jeans 34/30 in Frankenmore with the skinny Super RotoSwirl. I'll have to fudge with the water level cause it is a large cap machine, but I can make it fill to about where the standard machine would go, and likewise pit it against the Oasis, even though it has a hard time rolling jeans on normal cycle.
 
My Jeans Load, not necessarily vintage

MY F&P can handle 8 pairs (34x32 for those who must know!) pretty well. I've done 9 which kinda pushes the limit.

I washed 9 pairs of jeans in my Calypso last night. See thread in Deluxe for details.

Perhaps I should try a large load with the Double-Duty Surgilator next door ...
 
My nostalgic side wants the Pregnant Roto-Swirl (it was on the '60 Kenmore I grew up with), but I seem to recall my '84 Whirlpool (with the winged Surgilator) did a better job with all-jeans loads than the preggers 'Swirl.

My 'simply curious' side wonders how the Roto-Flex would do. I always thought they didn't look too convincing, but I've never seen one in action so that's pure speculation on my point.

I've always thought this: Why not use the whole length of the agitator to do the cleaning, rather than just putting fins at the very bottom of an agitator. The Surgilator seems to fit that bill pretty well.
 
might be but where's the romance

My neighbors here in Munich have a picture somewhere of their 18 month old kid asleep in my lap, me asleep with my back against the refrigerator...and we both fell asleep watching the front loader in their kitchen wash.
David loved that.
No doubt about it - modern front loaders wash better. But where is the romance? When my old rollermatic started thumping away I just knew those clothes were getting clean, cleaner, cleanest. I could feel it in the whole house.
And that last thrust up then down while the spin started building. Oh!
I ain't gonna say that word, but my, I sure was jealous of my 501s in those days.
Regardless of who "wins" - the fun part is the sound and the action of both these wonders of post-modern technology.
 
I know I have bad breath--oh no!

and Hyperhydrosis--how unseemly! and Dwarfism--what a sight! and many other known defects, but unless I am also an irredeemable moron--poor b@$tard! Frigidaire's pulsator is more powerful than Frigidaire's three ring agitator, but I have neither, so I can't conduct any tests. I only have memory. And I could be wrong.

Robert, what is your opinion of the pulsator vs. the 3 ring agitator.

I love the Whirlpool family as much as the Frigidaire, and I have a Surgilator WP.
I think the Surgilator won, but if you put a pulsator in the ring, Surgi loses.
 
what is your opinion of the pulsator vs. the 3 ring agitator

Hi Mike, a 3-Ring agitator is a pulsator so I do not understand your question.

I'm working on the video now everyone and I hope to have it ready soon.
 
YAY, the video is ready, again here is exactly what I did:

I filled each machine with warm water and let them agitate for 4 minutes, then at the 4 minute mark I started filming, by that time the jeans had settled into their respective wash flow. Then I added two dry white socks to each machine so we can how quickly the socks get rolled over and under.

I think this video is super cool! It shows how completely different a Whirlpool/Kenmore and a GM Frigidaire washers perform the exact same task. Both machines have their strong points and both have their weak points.

I will hold my commentary on those points until after you guys get to see the video. Please pay particular attention to how I load the Frigidaire. Even though I added no detergent you will see a small amount of suds in the Frigidaire which got to wash the jeans first. These jeans were clean to begin with and were last washed in the Maytag Neptune Top Loader, the suds in the Frigidaire confirms my suspicions that the Neptune Top Loader is poor at rinsing. So enjoy everyone and let us know what you think.

 
Whew!

Ok I was worried about my 66 rollermatic washing jeans but I feel it will do a good job. Not sure about a queen size comfoter - oh well laundrymat here i come.

Joe
jamman_98
 
video

Hi Robert,
This was a great video. Yes the loading is the key. Even though I always liked Whirlpool / Kenmore washers - I will still always go with the Frigidaire. It still gives a better rollover and it is more gentle on the clothes with a more through wash.
Thanks
Peter
 
Wow, that was very cool. The Frigidaire definitely held true to the gentle "live water action" and the rollover was nice and steady; I saw those socks go under and come back up again many times. The Surgi-more really thrashed them around, but I noticed it had a hard time getting the air bubbles out, which seemed to impede the turnover a bit. I noticed this by how long the socks remained on top, however, once the socks actually reached the center, they went down quickly! I wouldn't doubt that both loads were of equal cleanliness from each machine, but I'd say the Frigidaire won.
 
I wouldn't doubt that both loads were of equal cleanliness from each machine, but I'd say the Frigidaire won.

Well Austin it depends, IMHO I'm not so sure there is a clear winner here. I will explain why later after we get some input from what others thought.
 
I thought this was most interesting. My 2 cents:

*Seemed like the Frigidaire load was a squeeze when dry
*The Kenmore appeared to have some open space when dry
*The Frigidaire definitely had more rollover by virtue of
pulsating agitation
*The Kenmore appeared to have less rollover due
to the socks not working their way up, but I think the
oscillating agitator moves the load from side to side as
well as rolling over, in a slower manner.

So its difficult to say which load was washed more completely.
 

Similar threads

ryner1988
I think I'm going to finally buy a front loading washer and I have many questions
2
Replies
24
Views
82
spookiness
S
eemac
Speed Queen top-loader towels smell bad
2
Replies
36
Views
86
gelaundry4ever
G
Chetlaham
Most Maddening Washer Commerical
3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
97
gelaundry4ever
G
maytagneptune
Fisher&Paykel AquaSmart tips for lightweight synthetic loads.
Replies
2
Views
5
DADoES
DADoES
ryner1988
I did something I said I’d never do again — I bought a new VMW
Replies
14
Views
28
ryner1988
ryner1988

Latest posts

Back
Top