Will it be part of your thesis?
OF COURSE! I would't have worked so hard if there weren't be a valid goal!
Would you like to know what I learnt?
- the problem in washing consumptions (honestly here this argument has been very musch discussed!) IS NOT DECREASE THE WATER LEVEL! This machine fill higher than any modern one but rinses very fewer times! So what is the difference between 5rinsesx2liters-each=10liters i.e. and 2rinsesx5liters-each?!?! NONE!
- Higher water level means:
* less concentration of detergent in water: so more delicate chemical action of it
* less scrubbing of the clothes tumbling: the water works in this case as a lubrificant...clothes slide and don't scrub with each other.
* less detergent concentration = less risks of allergy!!
- the conseguence of the concept above is that the cycle could be very very less long!
- this machine then is hot-cold fill: at her era there were more machine like that here...then the less water filling let the producers swap onto cold-fill only...but looking at the above theory it's not so! Thus the tomorrow-washing should be
- with more water level
- with bio and eco-detergent: so you can re-use or re-cycle the same wash (there should be a suds-return coming again!)
- the more water filled should be heated up externally with rennovable source such as solar-board, woodburning plants, bio-mass heater, heat pump...
This machine thus should be an example of how should producers will design the tomorrow-machine! After more than 40 years it's not old...but the newest ever see
