deeptub
Member
I'll tell you why it's a DC motor--because apparently I can't type a physics test passage about DC current and look at discussomat at the same time.
Of course it's not a DC motor. It's a 220V motor. It looks about half the height of the US motor. And according to the brochure it's 1/3 (probably metric) hp (1 US hp=0.986 metric hp) and 2840 rpm vs. 3450 rpm of the US motor.
I wonder if there was any difference in the pump design to compensate for the slower motor?
Also according to the brochure, the water heater seems to be 3000W. US heating element was 1400W, so that probably does explain the filter's design. Greg-you must be right, this machine must use a cold water inlet. (And wouldn't that have to be so, if KA expected to be taken seriously in Europe?) I note that at 1100W, the drying element is the same as US.
That control panel must have seemed gaudy as hell in Europe.
T.
Of course it's not a DC motor. It's a 220V motor. It looks about half the height of the US motor. And according to the brochure it's 1/3 (probably metric) hp (1 US hp=0.986 metric hp) and 2840 rpm vs. 3450 rpm of the US motor.
I wonder if there was any difference in the pump design to compensate for the slower motor?
Also according to the brochure, the water heater seems to be 3000W. US heating element was 1400W, so that probably does explain the filter's design. Greg-you must be right, this machine must use a cold water inlet. (And wouldn't that have to be so, if KA expected to be taken seriously in Europe?) I note that at 1100W, the drying element is the same as US.
That control panel must have seemed gaudy as hell in Europe.
T.