Points of view.....
I would disagree in what you said regarding diapers...even here lots of people used and still use cloth diapers, my granma used cloth diapers for my father, my friend choosed to use cloth diapers for her twins to save like many others are doing over here, but speaking of the past like many other people, my granma said never had the need to use chlorine that much nor she remember she did for her younger sisters when helping her mother washing their diapers in the 30s (she was the older sister of many ones), like others my Great grandmorher and granma were well aware that chlorine ruined clothes no matter if you follow the directions, in the long run it does, she would rather try different ways, so higher temperatures/boiling, soaking for days etc, and just in a few occasions she said used to use chlorine bleach, even in the times of lye soap and lye in wash tubs they rather preferred using lye than bleach to get stuff "bleached" (even if lye would have had simlar devasant effect in the long run, probably weaker than bleach though), bleach and bluing as a routine were not common, bluing was used occasionally (she said it that in 40s and 50s it was more a fashion rather than an actual need) and that most of the times a good soap made the job of keeping whites white and clean (in some areas they still used ashes and lye even in the 50s)... so even in old days without machines other methods of bleaching than chlorine were preferentally used, they just avoided it and found other ways to do it the most possible, and when possible, because of this well-know fact that bleach ruins clothes...
But bleach has always been a known counterpart of laundry...and in some occasions it was needed as you say...but not always and in modern days (60s to present) someway less but keep being a must for some ...
Bleach has always been considered a laundry counterpart here too...otherwise P&G chlorine bleach Ace would not exist, and the Ace bleach old lady is an "icon" in Italy even from the non-bleach users....
As you say there're people who would use it, others simply don't...this is both here and in the USA of course...some just relies on detergents to get the job of "cleaning" and bleaching that a detergent is supposed to do( meant as stains and yellowed whites) and with even better results in some cases....
Others indeed are: "Gimme bleach gimme bleach" people...
Me I am one of those that gets brilliant results without, and that would never use it as I thnk a detergent does, would and should do it's job,...others says they absolutely need it for about every white load which has some stains..
Of course bleach would get stains out and so bleach dingy/yellowed laundry and it's proven it do so...but like it, and as I say again I think good detergents and a good wash as it should be, would do the same job, and without ruining/damaging "eating" textiles that chlorine does (in the long run), no matter new or older detergents as long as they're good ones, they just do it and always did for me... so here is what I mean when I keep saying that I don't and think never will understand how certain people keep needing bleach and can't get the same results with detergents as I do and many others does ......
I have no explanation for it...probably has something to do with water temperature these people use or cycles used or as I think the fact that they keep using crappy products and just does look to use better ones..who knows?
I would need to bleach too if I'd use crappy products... I just look for products that do the job they're supposed to do...bleach is supposed to remove stains, detergent also...so why you need chlorine bleach to remove them? Let it do to the detergent, if it's good will and should do so as it is supposed to!
Detergents are meant to remove stains, dirt and get stuff clean white, have inside oxy stuff, enzymes and some OBS and whenever there're not these ingredients in it there are additives..so why there're people keep using chlorine and have their stuff eaten so quickly bi it? That's what I dont get!
This does not make sense.. I think it's because they can't launder properly or keep choosing bad products....
Regarding celebrities status, I don't usually like buying something because of celebrity status, but I fully understand your speech...never discussed this of the character..I just said it is weird that a detergents comes with name of a Tv program, I don't get/like it was marketed kinda "I can clean the Mike Rowe's dirty jobs stuff"..others just does the same way ..but I understand the celebrity status thing and that one would buy it because like him and there is his face on the package...marketng is all about it...it's the same reason why they use famous characters for advertising..
Then
I just expressed my opinion about his program, other would agree or disagree, it stops here for me, never thought I'd have started a polemic with my statement, you know points of view, is like if I would say you that I like who knows, Andrew Zimmern's TV program and you'd say that you think he is a filthy "swine" and his is a nasty program.
I personally like it because it shows many diverse cultures through the food, maybe you would not get the fact of the diverse cultures because you're not interested about, so you'd just see the nasty side...
I think probably I don't see whatever there is of nice in "Dirty-jobs" and what I see is just a clumsy man pretending to do what other hard working people do every day for serious, this showing it with a sarcastic note, almost teasing them for what they do for living ...
I'm sure it must have positive sides, unfortunately I just get the "silly" one...