Question for Washertalk and Others

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

Robert well said

we are not interested in holding hands at the salad bar in shoneys LOL, we are interested in Family plan health insurance, filing joint taxes(it if works out to our advantage), no bull shit with car trade ins, i drive less and drive the new one, we trade in the older that takes a beating to my partners job many miles. this process is like selling a car or truck to a stranger, greatly simplified if the auto just belonged to mr and mr. as a family plan. plus you lose your tax credit for the car you are trading in if you are putting it in your significant others name, different title names, family car insurance. there is no big shame in having an open alternate lifestyle. but lawd sometimes its damned inconvenient. alr2903. i will do my best and VOTE my conscience.
 
For the time being, anyway, as long as one so-called moderate conservative can still vote for these modern-day Nazis next week and do so with a clear conscience, we should NOT be aiming for reconciliation, forgiveness, and oneness with them, for they know precisely what the agendas are <br
They know what they believe; they are simply way too cowardly to come out and assert themselves. But that doesn't mean they'd all be donning the white hoods of their hearts if push came to shove <br
There are ALREADY large-scale voting irregularities in early voting in Florida. They are becoming more and more brazen in their actions, and one should take care to remember that everything Adolf Hitler did to consolidate power was totally legal <br
There's a little something for everyone here. The USS Eisenhower is docked in the Straits of Hormuz, just waiting. The Port of Newark, for one, has been turned over to foreign interests. Next week's Jerusalem Pride parade has the potential to become a bloodbath, the likes of which we have never seen (possibly the New Orleans bar fire of the early '70s comes close). At year end, our "reformed" bankruptcy laws promise to put this country at the brink of financial collapse <br
And I don't think I've ever heard of a government that advocated abstinence for unmarrieds until age 29 <br
The only way we can guarantee the true will of the people on Election Day is for the Democrats to trounce the theocrats by a such a wide margin, that even Diebold hacking and voter intimidation efforts will be nullified <br
Please speak to your exit pollers on the way out-exit polls are a good indicator of how people actually vote, and may be needed to challenge obviously skewed voting results <br
Really, it's our lives that are on the line.
 
very funny rickr, I read the real history books and I drive a pickup,and if you come down here trying to make someone sick you will probably get your butt kicked by one of those rednecks.I am a tolerant type redneck, you and your boyfriend can do wahat you want in front of me because I have seen some nasty crap in my day and nothing much bothers me. You are trying to insult me by saying redneck, but I take it as acompliment,but there are those who would see it as a real dirty word and be upset just like f-word or n-word hurts other people. But thats not me. I hope that gays will be able to marry and get all the rights that they are looking for. rickr, I bet you are one of those people who thinks the civil war was fought over slavery. If you are,Ill send you a copy of my history book. Don
 
I fear Scotty is right...

I just re-read this thread. With very few exceptions - me when my dander is up being one - we all seem to be arguing about the oldest problem of any democracy. The premise of a democracy is, in a fair election, those who get the most votes win. Majority rule
To a large extent because of the enormous differences among the thirteen founding states, the United States has always sought to balance this majority rule with a degree of respect and protection for the minority(-ies)who lose the election
If Lincoln had not been assassinated, the former Confederacy would not have been subject to the humiliations which have led to problems right to this very day (the federal response to Kathrina comes to mind). Lincoln wanted to reforge the ties and bonds between the Rebels and the Yankees...not out of any particular devotion or love for Dixie...but because he understood the meaning of "e pluribus unum.&quot
The current republican government no longer believes in this principle - and that is what is making so many liberals and traditional conservatives angry
This group of republicans believes in "might makes right". Neither a traditional American perspective nor yet a particularly Christian
(Oh, rusty as my Latin is: "out of many, one").
 
The government legislating open discrimination against a group of TAX PAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS, sends a clear message: It is nothing more than a form of legislated APARTHIED
Gay's should NOT be a political issue at all.EVER <br
Years ago the same group of religious fundamentalists managed to get legislation passed that banned the legal sales of alcholoic beverages. That really bombed. Too many generations have now passed since Prohibition---so hardly anyone remembers how it affected the country. For the first time in American history one single piece of legislation created an atmosphere where every agency of local and federal government coud be corrupted right on up to the President, who had cases of illegal liquor sent to the Whitehouse for all the politcians to party with. The Mafia went from simple gangs of local thugs to a Multi-Million dollar organization of crime that criss-crossed the country and came to control many local governments. It got really bad for a while. And it taught at least a few generations that legislating morality could backfire in a very bad way <br
Since the divorce rate amongst the Heterosexual population of the U.S. is now over 60 percent, one would soon expect the fundamentalists to want legislation that bans Heterosexuals from marrying more than once
I wonder what they would think of that <br
My point is---the GOVERNMENT should NEVER be in the business of LEGISTATING DISCRIMINATION against any group of TAX PAYING AMERICAN CITIZENS!!!!!!!!!! Be they Gay, Straight, sideways, green , purple, whatever <br
I will also point out that patriotism has never been an issue amongst the Gay population

From the beginnings of U.S. history, Gays have proudly served their country in all ranks of military. There are plenty of highly decorated Gay American Veterans
And Arlington cemetery is peppered with dead GAYs who have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country
I know, because I have personally seen many of them buried there. I've also seen plenty of them buried in local veterans cemeteries as well
SHAME on the BUSH administration for creating a situation that sends a message to Americans that it is o.k. to openly discriminate against them. IT IS AN OUTRAGE <br
Oh, and by the way, current statistics show that the VAST MAJORITY of the dead American soldiers being returned from Iraq are/were DEMOCRATS! What a concept. (The idea that somehow patriotism=Republican is laughable.
The current administration pays little lip service to the (Democratic) families of those soldiers, as they do not make very good news spots on the evening news. Go 'figya. Pathetic <br
IMO if more people lived by the Ten Commandments the world would be a MUCH better place
We wouldn't hardly need the police department. Imagine the tax money we could save <br
Now, can you imagine that the current administration has nothing better to use as a campaign platform that a botched joke by John Kerry----who isn't even running for any kind of office <br
Oh, and by the way, Kerry also just happens to be a HIGHLY decorated American Veteran
Ooops---how quickly the Republican propagandists forget
I guess that is because Georgie managed to get his father to help him "cut and run" from his military service.
 
General Wesley Clark

We Owe it to Our Troops to Return to the Real Issue of the Election <br
The American public should simply accept no distractions. In our democracy, it is our duty to hold our elected leaders accountable. We do it at the ballot box. And we should do it not on the basis of personalities or stereotypes, but on the basis of results. Our men and women fighting in Iraq are held accountable for their performance and their conduct
On duty and off, twenty-four hours a day. They're fighting for us, for our safety, our rights, and our freedoms. Surely, we owe it to them to push aside the distractions and bring the focus back to the essence of this election <br
Iraq <br
In my short time in politics, I have learned many new clichés. One of them surely is that quote, "This is a critical election." In this case, it is dramatically true. The incumbent administration seemingly can not, or will not, make hard choices about the most important issue ever to face government officials: war and peace. The only hope for a national change of course is a Congress far more willing to play it's constitutionally required role of counter balance to a misguided executive. If citizens allow this great debate to be derailed by a momentary fracas over a mistake in a speech (by a man who has actually served in combat and does support the troops), we will have tragically missed a rare opportunity <br
John Kerry made a mistake trying to joke about "getting stuck in Iraq." But this election isn't about John Kerry; he isn't running. But, for a crazy day or two, his gaffe has provided a powerful distraction to an election shaping up to be a referendum on the President's national security policy, and his mission in Iraq, in particular. We can not allow the most powerful country in the world to get sidetracked when American lives and the future of our leadership in the world is at stake <br
When NATO attacked Yugoslavia to halt ethnic cleansing in 1999, a US reporter warned, 'let us do a feature article on you - the public only gets personalities, they don't get issues like this.'. It was a lesson I painfully relearned in my own Presidential campaign. So, I suppose it's to be expected that Senator Kerry's remarks - and John himself - would become the focal point of relief for a campaign that has been hard fought, and bitterly partisan <br
But with just a few days to go, it's time to return to the real issue of the campaign: Iraq. It was a war of choice, a war that has defined the Bush Presidency, and captured the almost unanimous support of the Republican-led Congress. For three long years after US troops occupied Baghdad, and as the country spiraled deeper into chaos and violence, loyalty to the President and his party demanded many members of Congress to follow his motto: "Stay the course". There have hardly been any Congressional hearings on the course of the war, but those that have been held have been firmly controlled. National security seemed to require that the Congress forfeit its independent oversight role. Critics were often demonized, public accountability minimized and policy alternatives were rejected <br
But by early September and through October, a combination of leaked intelligence and briefing documents and mounting American casualties has kept Iraq front and center in the minds of voters. Neither a record fall in gasoline prices at the pump nor a record rise in the DOW Industrials index seemed significant enough to distract the eye of the electorate. Even the spectacle of a Republican Congressman soliciting underage Congressional pages vanished quickly from the airwaves., to be replaced by reports of daily American casualties in Iraq, and a leaked preview of the dismal policy alternatives to be submitted by James Baker's bipartisan Iraq Study Group <br
Polls show a distinct and steady decline in public support for the war effort, and, more ominously, increasingly the American public has begun to doubt that the invasion of Iraq is in any way connected to winning the war on terror. Sitting Congressmen began to distance themselves from the President, the White House signalled that its "Stay the Course" motto was being refined, and more and more Republicans began to call for Rumsfeld's resignation. The vast majority of Americans wanted to see America succeed in its mission in Iraq, and now that seems increasingly unlikely. Democrats offered a more realistic, accurate appraisal of the situation, but there are no panaceas at this point. To many, every alternative seemed simplistic, wrong-headed, or even more prone to failure <br
In such a forbidding public dialogue, is it any wonder that John Kerry's blunder is being used to distract us? But how frightening and sad for America if we let this continue. How much easier to attack personalities and resurrect stereotypes than to deal with the grim realities of the Administration's national security predicament! The truth is that America's armed forces are badly overcommitted, the situation in Iraq has deteriorated beyond the ability of our best generals and bravest troops to correct, Afghanistan is sliding into a long-term insurgency which spells failure for the minimalist US commitment there, and both North Korea and Iran are ratcheting tensions. For a political party that fancies itself as the national security party, their cup runneth over with problems, many of their own making
Send to a frien
Post a Commen
Print Pos
Read all posts by Gen. Wesley Clar

Related News Storie <br
* NY Times Poll: 7 Out Of 10 Americans Say Bush Does Not Have A Plan To End The War..
* Volunteer Voters: "Ford Had No Choice But To Denounce" Kerry Comments..
* The Carpetbagger Report: Rush Limbaugh Can Callously Smear A Parkinson's Patient, But The President Will Still Give Him Exclusive Interviews.. <br
Related Blog Post <br
* Bob Burnett: Bush Losing Support of Militar
* Charles Karel Bouley: Ingrates or Righteously Angry Peopl
* Edward Humes: Nine Word <br
Comments
Thank you General Clark for this post, and for your service to our country <br
By: situationcritical on November 01, 2006 at 07:11p
Flag: [abusive
General Clark
Thank you for continuing to be one of the very few grown-ups in the political arena. I supported you in the 2004 primary election and would be proud to do so again in 2008 <br
By: FastMovingCloud on November 01, 2006 at 07:21p
Flag: [abusive
WHO LIED TO US? BUS <br
WHAT IS THIS ELECTION ABOUT? IRA <br
HOW DID WE END UP FIGHTING A WAR IN IRAQ? BUSH'S LIES <br <br
VOTE FOR CHANGE - VOTE FOR DEMOCRAT <br
By: VOTER on November 01, 2006 at 07:26p
Flag: [abusive
Yes I agree. While Bush is pounding his pud in Georgia al Maliki is ordering U.S. troops to stand down. The Air Force is asking for more emergency funds for transporting the dead. is Bush asleep at the helm again, or just AWOL <br
By: fourex on November 01, 2006 at 07:28p
Flag: [abusive
Thank you, General Clark <br
Thank you for your tireless, seemingly endless travels around the country, supporting Dem candidates and speaking truth to power. Thank you for your inspiration to us to be involved and for leading by example <br
And thank you for continuing to go on FOX News and expose those who rarely hear truth and facts to the harsh realities of what this administration has done to our troops and our country <br
You make me proud to be an American! I'm a proud Clark Democrat <br
-je <br
By: zeph on November 01, 2006 at 07:35p
Flag: [abusive
We need you Wes Clark. Other dems should be out there doing the same. Unfortunately, they do not have the courage. Words and actions are two different things. You have spine, thank god someone does. John Kerry is a good man. This swiftboating thing needs to be recognized, right now, for what it is. Anytime, and I mean anytime you have Rush involved, it is low-down drug-induced, streetcorner swiftboating. Rush and Chimp maybe can get high together. It is a utter shame America was dragged through this. The Bushes do not want their actions revealed. Bottom-line. John Kerry is no fool. I believe he was really trying to say something, maybe what is yet to come. Lets see after this election. (Farce <br
By: init on November 01, 2006 at 07:40p
Flag: [abusive
The situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate and yet from the President of the United States we hear sound bites that link Democrats to terrorist and yet no widespread outrage from the media. Kerry botches a joke and it dominates the MSM for days.. <br
By: df on November 01, 2006 at 08:15p
Flag: [abusive
The whole Kerry dust-up is the "October surprise", or Rove's attempt to distract the people. I don't know this for a fact. It just has his stink all over it. You know the smell, rotting flesh mixed with a foul duck egg and gently rolled in dog poop <br
No worries, General. Most people know what sort of liar they're going to get when they vote for the (R) candidate <br
By: Dogvane on November 01, 2006 at 08:21p
Flag: [abusive
What jen said. Gen. Clark, I hope you run in 2008 <br
Meanwhile, let's get out the vote <br
By: Lindy222 on November 01, 2006 at 09:26p
Flag: [abusive
Now just wait for the trolls <br
C'on guys! Attack the messenger! Do not go near the message <br
Cowards. Show us your vaunted respect for the uniform <br
Oh. The uniform as long as it goose-steps to the rethug fascism <br
Any one who questions Bush's policies is a traitor. Any question any doubt is treason <br
First in his class at West Point. Go ahead. Shit down his neck, you lying cowards <br
Bush on trial for war crimes! Yes <br
By: kevinofburbank on November 01, 2006 at 09:54p
Flag: [abusive
Thanks General Clark. While all the finger-to-the-wind Dem's were backing away from Kerry, a few brave people were willing to say it like it was. It would appear that those who've served have real courage and one day this country will wake up to what real courage is. Kerry is campaigning for Lamont in Conn where no other Dem's have dared go. So has General Clark I believe. I still am stuck with the image of Kerry on 9/11. When everyone else was running away literally from Capitol Hill, here he was strolling calm as you please, looking up for incoming, like he would take them on himself. Our pet goat Commander In Chief was hightailing it elsewhere. Flying over everything like he did the devistation in New Orleans after Katrina. One day the spell is gonna break and Americans will be able to see clearly what true courage is. I just hope I'm still around to see it <br
One thing though: Kerry has got to learn not to set up the Republican right wing machine. If he'd just keep speaking from the heart and stop trying to be something. Does he have to go through the wilderness like Gore before he just let's go? I hope it doesn't take him as long <br
By: LaFilleEnRose on November 01, 2006 at 10:02p
Flag: [abusive
the general is absolutely right. lets get back to real issues like this ILLegal ILLplanned and ILLconducted war.let us also not forget "bootyman" mark foley and republican corruption. where is tom delay, deke cunninghan and the abrams influence peddling crew in todays discussions? it has been truly disgusting listening to the wartime deserter in chief george bush and dick "five deferments" cheney ranting about how offended they were that someone might have dissed the troops. the biggest troop dissing event in america takes place every veterans day when bush, a war time deserter or cheney a cowardly draft dodger who pleaded for and received five deferments, when guys his age were dying in vietnam, lays a wreath on the most sacred grave in the USA, the "tomb of the unknown". that act alone brings more dishonor and disgrace to this nation and to soldiers that served, putting their lives on the line, than any thing john kerry, a decorated veteran, could ever cause by screwing up the delivery of a one-liner <br
By: drow1stboy on November 01, 2006 at 10:30p
Flag: [abusive
you are absolutely right general . lets get back to real issues,like the republican corruption that allowed "bootynan" foley to molest congressional pages nonstop in order to hold on to political party.it is disgusting, to listen to a war time deserter president, george bush and a cowardly draft dodger like dick "five deferments" cheney who pleaded for and got five deferments to stay out of uniform while other young men were paying the ultimate price in vietnam.john kerry, a bonified war hero and the bonified winner of the presidential election in 2004, was castigated by a bunch of lying chickenhawks including democrats and accused of dissing our troops in iraq. the greatest and most shameful dissing of our troops in america occurs on every veterans day when either an election stealing and war time deserter, george bush or a craven, cur dog, draft dodger who accepted five deferments, dick cheney place a wreath on the most sacred grave in america...the tomb of the unknown soldier.it is a sacrilige. no other event in this nation disses our soldiers in iraq and afghanistan more <br
By: drow1stboy on November 01, 2006 at 10:42p
Flag: [abusive
bootynam=bootyma
hold on to political party=hold on to political powe <br
By: drow1stboy on November 01, 2006 at 10:48p
Flag: [abusive
You'd think it was a slow news week. News media everywhere jumping on this one: a has-been (never-was?) Democrat senator putting his foot in his mouth
Meanwhile George Malaprop Bush spouting off inanities left and right
Record number of American men and women killed in Iraq during the month of October
Foley, Delay, Abramoff, etc. etc. etc. What the hell is it with the news media? Are they really that desperate for a story? Doesn't Snowjob give them enough to write about <br
By: azm on November 02, 2006 at 01:04a
Flag: [abusive
GENERAL CLARK IS SO RIGHT ABOUT RETURNING TO THE REAL ISSUES FACING US THIS ELECTION <br
HOWEVER BEFORE WE DO, I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE A NATIONA <br
"THANK YOU" CAMPAIGN TO THE WHITE HOUSE FOR TODAY' <br
DISTORTION OF THE FACTS <br
We should let the White House, the Republican Party and th <br
sleazy media hounds know how much we appreciate seeing through Bush's lies and distortions just days before the Election <br
After all it was Bush's misrepresenting facts which got us into Iraq <br
We need to let him know his latest Rove tactic has failed <br
WE SHOULD NOT LET THIS GET US DOWN. WE SHOULD HAVE MORE RESOLVE THAN EVER BEFORE TO SHOVE THIS IN BUSH'S FACE <br
LET'S TEASE HIM WITH THOUSANDS OF THANK YOU CALLS AN <br
EMAILS. LET'S MAKE HIM SQUIRM! LET'S PUT THE HEAT BAC <br
WHERE IT BELONGS <br
By: VOTER on November 02, 2006 at 01:37a
Flag: [abusive
MOVE ON <br
No matter what the news-blip of the moment may be, the Bush War in Iraq is an American Tragedy <br
HAD ENOUGH? It is MOST important to vote Democrartic this time <br
By: ALUJCIC on November 02, 2006 at 02:32a
Flag: [abusive
Thank You General Clark. The reason they're in Iraq is they didn't stop the US from being attacked with more than enough information in the first place. This administration dropped the ball, and then continued making disasterous mistakes from then on. We went after OBL, then stopped, falsely accused Iraq, then falsely mislead everyone that Iraq was involved. They were not. They mislead us into believing they were a threat to our security and safety, and they weren't. They sqandered 100's of billions without a plan, trying to accomplish occupation of Iraq on the ground without enough troops and not equipped properly, against a lot of experts saying a ground conflict couldn't be done without lots of casualties. Again they didn't listen. They continued to jepardize the lives of many of our service people and continue the rhetoric and spin that we're winning, when thats more lies. We deserve the truth, our military people deserve the truth, and we need to have a government administration we can look up to and trust, and we don't have that. We need to get the killings stopped, and accept the reality that it was wrong to have killed so many, and put our troops in constant danger for so long. The only way to do that is to vote the group out that have enabled the administration to continue these disasterous foreign policies, and domestic policies. We don't need any more to die from the failure of others <br <br
 
Sorry about that - I'm not sure how I ended up with the blog's comments in there, but it's from the Huffington Post - I don't get too much into the blogs, but the articles are quite interesting and sometimes, as in the case of Gen. Clark's, not found elsewhere <br
Here is a bit of a history lesson on Iraq from today's NYT <br
November 2, 200
Op-Ed Columnis
Same Old Demon
By DAVID BROOK <br
Policy makers are again considering fundamental changes in our Iraq policy, but as they do I hope they read Elie Kedourie’s essay, “The Kingdom of Iraq: A Retrospect. <br
Kedourie, a Baghdad-born Jew, published the essay in 1970. It’s a history of the regime the British helped establish over 80 years ago, but it captures an idea that is truer now than ever: Disorder is endemic to Iraq. Today’s crisis is not three years old. It’s worse now, but the crisis is perpetual. This is a bomb of a nation <br
“Brief as it is, the record of the kingdom of Iraq is full of bloodshed, treason and rapine,” Kedourie wrote <br
And his is a Gibbonesque tale of horror. There is the endless Shiite-Sunni fighting. There is a massacre of the Assyrians, which is celebrated rapturously in downtown Baghdad. Children are gunned down from airplanes. Tribal wars flare and families are destroyed. A Sunni writer insults the Shiites and the subsequent rioters murder students and policemen. A former prime minister is found on the street by a mob, killed, and his body is reduced to pulp as cars run him over in joyous retribution <br
Kedourie described “a country riven by obscure and malevolent factions, unsettled by the war and its aftermath.” He observed, “The collapse of the old order had awakened vast cupidities and revived venomous hatreds. <br
In 1927, a British officer asked a tribal leader: “You now have a government, a constitution, a parliament, ministers and officials — what more can you want?” The tribal leader replied, “Yes, but they speak with a foreign accent. <br
The British tried to encourage responsible Iraqi self-government, to no avail. “The political ambitions of the Shia religious headquarters have always lain in the direction of theocratic domination,” a British official reported in 1923. They “have no motive for refraining from sacrificing the interests of Iraq to those which they conceive to be their own. <br
At one point, the British high commissioner, Sir Henry Dobbs, argued that if Britain threatened to withdraw its troops, Iraqis would behave more responsibly. It didn’t work. Iraqis figured the Brits were bugging out. They concluded it was profitless to cultivate British friendship. Everything the British said became irrelevant <br
The Iraq of his youth, Kedourie concluded, “was a make-believe kingdom built on false pretenses.” He quoted a British report from 1936, which noted that the Iraqi government would never be a machine based on law that treated citizens impartially, but would always be based on tribal favoritism and personal relationships. Iraq, Kedourie said, faced two alternatives: “Either the country would be plunged into chaos or its population should become universally the clients and dependents of an omnipotent but capricious and unstable government.” There is, he wrote, no third option <br
Today Iraq is in much worse shape. The most perceptive reports describe not so much a civil war as a complete social disintegration. This latest descent was initiated by American blunders, but is exacerbated by the same old Iraqi demons: greed, blood lust and a mind-boggling unwillingness to compromise for the common good, even in the face of self-immolation <br
The core problem is the same one Kedourie identified decades ago. Iraq is teetering on the edge of futility. Perhaps a competent occupation could have preserved it as a coherent entity, but now the Iraqi national identity is looking like a suicidal self-delusion <br
Partitioning the country would be traumatic, so after the election it probably makes sense to make one last effort to hold the place together. Fire Donald Rumsfeld to signal a break with the past. Alter troop rotations so that 30,000 more troops are policing Baghdad <br
But if that does not restore order, if Iraqi ministries remain dysfunctional and the national institutions remain sectarian institutions in disguise, then surely it will be time to accede to reality. It will be time to effectively end Iraq, with a remaining fig-leaf central government or not. It will be time to radically diffuse authority down to the only communities that are viable — the clan, tribe or sect <br
A muscular U.S. military presence will be more necessary than ever, to deter neighboring powers and contain bloodshed. And the goals will remain the same: to nurture civilized democratic societies that reject extremism and terror <br
But the boundaries may have to change. The war was an attempt to lift a unified Iraq out of its awful history, but history has proved stubborn. It’s time to adjust the plans to reality
 
Good morning Don <br
I am not trying to say you are anything. I would say, from your posts, that you have already shown who you are. If there was any doubt, your last post fills in the blanks
I do not care what you drive, what books you read,what nasty crap you see, or what nasty names you and your friends use, or that you are a tolerant redneck. (your own words <br
I do not back down from a fight if it is something worth fighting for. If you met up with my boyfriend, and HIS buddies, you would pee your pants. They like to fight for fun <br
At any rate, perhaps you and I should stop meeting like this Don. I don't think our relationship is going to work out
Besides, this is a thread for intelligent comments, and of good things to come. It's really not about old wars, and bigotry <br
Yours
Rickr <br <br
 
massachusetts? whats that? Thats yankee territory bud. I live in the south where we do things right. Do <br
AHHH! Theres that old southern charm and hopspitality i hear so much about. Please,...you can have it.
 
Don and Rickr

Things are heating up here-Don,I don't understand homosexuality either,but the point is that I don't have to.I don't need to understand it to know that those who practice it HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO SO.Rickr and others,I apologize for the words Don used(even though he used them in the context of others using them).When someone on this site needs repair advice,or a part to complete a restoration,no one asks whether the giver or reciever of the help is gay or straight,northern or southern,black,white,or other,male or female,etc.If I see three men beating up one man on a corner,I'm not going to ask the victim what his sexual orientation is before helping him.The point is that good people are just that,and just maybe discussions like this are what can bring good people to understand each other better
Tom
 
Hey, I'm all good, and have no problem with Don. We just don't think the same way about my lifestyle. I think it's my own business when you get right down to it, and Don doesn't have anything to do with it. I won't change the way Don thinks, and I am not going to change to please anyone, so lets go on now.
 
First of all,Mulls,you can not apologize for me. I did not say anything to apologize for. Rickr, I did not ask you to change your lifestyle. I read what everybody is bitching about and then put in my 2cents. I dont hate gays or any race,so where you get bigotry from is beyond me. Don
 
If history were taught anymore, people would realize how dangerous and corrupt life is when religion and state are one. They do not know about the Holy Roman Empire, of which it is said, was neither Roman nor holy. They do not know about the Puritans and Cavalliers in England, nor the Puritans in the American colonies. They cannot draw any lessons from Iraq and Iran. We had a little taste of it here in the DC area when the White House tried to cut a deal with the Salvation Army. The White House was going to let the SA provide faith based help, and get a lot of money for doing it, but they assured the SA that it would not have to comply with local anti-discrimination laws under the contract that the federal government was drafting. Says Who? When that hit the fan, it made a big mess and people who were not blinded by the constant references to religion made by elected and unelected officials saw which way this was headed. Of course when their nasty attitude and double-dealing were made known, donations fell and SA kettles were not allowed near some establishments, but it was all blamed on the homosexuals and their heathen supporters in the "Democrat" party. I wonder which scholar came up with using a noun as an adjective, but I guess that means they are what, "Republics"? I do not know why people who are supposed to be so filled with Christ's spirit are so bigoted, mean and hate-filled. I do not understand why heterosexual men are so obsessed about gay and lesbian sex; unless, of course, they really want to do it but are too chicken (no offense meant to any poultry). It seems amazing to those of us who lived through John F. Kennedy's campaign where the fear was that the Vatican would run the United States that we now have our government asking Rome to prevail upon the Church Bishops in the United States to advance the administration's plans to ban same-sex marriage. <br
The sad thing about democracy is the same as the best thing about democracy; the majority rules. Human rights for minorities should not be subject to vote. Human rights are human rights and the majority should not be in the position of taking away or denying them to any group solely on the basis of who they are. <br
Would you call it treasonous that our government refuses to defend out borders; letting in huge numbers of undocumented non-citizens at a time when security because of the war on terror is their mantra? These people in charge have an agenda. We won't know what it is until it's too late, but they have to be working toward something. This war is either a smokescreen to take our attention away from something even more awful than war or is a way for them to steal the treasury of our country; transfering a very large part of it to the corporations they control so that they will have it all when they leave office. I don't know where they plan to live when all of the social and environmental pathologies they have allowed and encouraged come to pass with a vengence, but they will have their precious wealth.
 
Civil Communication

I am 55 and have been around the block several times. I was always identified as a "girly man" and it was sometimes assumed, I was gay. I did not come out or begin to participate in a homosexual acts until 2 years ago. The perceptions however, have been what I had to respond to and live with, my entire life.
Having been perceived as a queer, I managed to have a very successful career, raised four healthy children, participated in organized religion was a mover and shaker in the community.
Freed from sterotyping into male behaviors,I found many opportunities to talk with men. Men on the pipleline in Alaska, in the South, the Midwest, throughout the country. My experience has been that men are willing and receptive to an opportunity to take off the iron collar and talk about the struggle of filling the male role model, as they perceived it for themselves. Communing with a women in such a fashion, is not the same. A women cannot understand.
As flawed as my masculinity is, I could still understand what it's like to have everything be your job, your fault, your responsibilty and a reflection of your reputation, simply because of your gender. It has been my extreme pleasure for almost 25 years, to simply hold witness to universal struggle of being male and living up to the set of expectations that is implicit in being male in America. The greatest gift for any man, is to be in a place where even for a moment, you don't have to be strong
I think of all the moments my heart will beat in my lifetime. Then I think of how many of those moments, my clothes will be off, if front of another person. Almost none. The arguement of what I do with my genitals is moot with everyone but the person I am looking naked at. That is why I believe a certain amount of decorum and civility serves me. I am not obligated to preoffend every person I meet, before I know if the subject of gay sex will ever come up. (No Pun) Univerally men are weary. The life we thought we'd be living in our 50's is unlike everything I prepared myself for. To maintain the status Quo, let alone move ahead requires more savvy, skill and pressure than many of us can conjure. All around us, bastions of security, pension plans, lending institutions, retirement, are all disappearing. I believe, as men, our struggle is more universal than we give voice to. At the end of the day, if we were blindfolded, the penis has no brain. Warm, moist and rythmic brings the same response
Soapboxing and driving each other further into our isolated corners is delaying acceptance of the real truth. We are tired, frightened and need each other more than we admit <br
Intolerances in the Gay community are as rampant and cruel as anything ever devised in a concentration camp
Be 55, not having left the gym with toned abs, wearing what is considered the acceptable label and walk in a bar. Old Gay Alert. Then, hook up with an old gay and hear, "If I meet one more person who doesn't own their own house, have a 401K and able to join me when I have a chance to fly to Mexico, I 'll just scream." You must look a certain way, be seen with a right crowd, use the correct speech, have the appearance of wealth and HEALTH and YOUTH, regardless of your age, socio income level and choice of metro, leather or stank.
Intolorance is universal. It is not a phenominon known only to men in states with South as the first word
Many have posted their joy of arguing for the sake of it. Love that turned over soup tureen! Haha. This thread is evidence that arguing is devisive, hurtful and polarizing. When we didn't agree in the first 20 posts than the rancor increased, the generalized statements became more volatile and we have become completely distracted with attacking each other and defending our point. At his very moment our government, the real enemy in this, is happyily whistling a tune and methodically stripping each of our rights and hope, gay and straight.
They won, because someone here "loves" to argue <br
Gentlemen, we are not the enemy <br
Kelly
 
word, Kelly, word

I think, at this point, it is best to simply accept a very simple truth: Those of us who are dissatisfied with the current administration and legislature will continue to be. Those who aren't have obviously no problem with what has gone down the last six years
They aren't open or willing to accept what anyone else has to say; we are too convinced that our freedoms and lives are at stake here
It is a bad situation, very bad
Let's just hope those of us who feel threatened are overreacting and those who really think things are ok are not just blind to reality
Because once the mechanisms are in place, that's it. There will be no one to rescue us as in Nazi Germany...the US is truly the last, great hope of mankind. And if this country goes, that's all she wrote
Enough clichés, enough discussion. I think it is time for me to retire from this thread
Please, everyone who still believes that homosexuals have a right to exist in peace, go vote on Tuesday. The democrats may not be something you feel great about, but consider the alternative...many many gays and Jews and Roma were there and died here in Germany, don't let it happen again.
 
Interesting turn of events

This was a news bulletin on MSNBC a few minutes ago. It is amazing how one's true orientation can be supressed and/or kept hidden for only so long and then, suddenly, like the Jack in the Box cranked to the exact note, the top flies open and everything is revealed. You would almost swear that some closets have explosive bolts on the door hinges <br
I loved our Jack in the Box. Inside, with all of the fabric under the clown's head, I thought it looked like a washing machine (a big surprise, I know).

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15536263/
 
Come out,come out, wherever you are....

Well... These are the kinds of things that staying in the closet will do to you. These guys are getting it somewhere. Or at least trying. What a shame. Some people even commit suicide rather than face a hostile society. It is not healthy to stay in the closet.
 
two words

considering the anguish and shame and hatred the church has caused, and the role that clowns like Haggard has in spreading it.. *Just Desserts*
 
Yep, they figure, why wait for Armageddon to happen? Let's beat the Christmas rush <br
I'm not sure Haggard's fall from whatever grace he'd attained will have much effect on his followers, politically. Many feel that if he's saved, he's not obliged to follow the Ten Commandments at any rate. It's complicated, but they have all these rationalizations that seem to reconcile all these little contradictions for them.....it's dizzying <br
I've been reading what are easily the most vile, hate-filled posts regarding the escalating violence surrounding the Jerusalem Pride parade next week, and, frankly, I'm really beginning to fear a bloodbath over there <br
Yet what message would cancelling the parade send <br
Sometimes, I feel as confused as an eleven-year-old.
 
Power in the hands of one party - the corporations.

November 3, 200
Op-Ed Columnis
As Bechtel Goe
By PAUL KRUGMA <br
Bechtel, the giant engineering company, is leaving Iraq. Its mission — to rebuild power, water and sewage plants — wasn’t accomplished: Baghdad received less than six hours a day of electricity last month, and much of Iraq’s population lives with untreated sewage and without clean water. But Bechtel, having received $2.3 billion of taxpayers’ money and having lost the lives of 52 employees, has come to the end of its last government contract <br
As Bechtel goes, so goes the whole reconstruction effort. Whatever our leaders may say about their determination to stay the course complete the mission, when it comes to rebuilding Iraq they’ve already cut and run. The $21 billion allocated for reconstruction over the last three years has been spent, much of it on security rather than its intended purpose, and there’s no more money in the pipeline <br
The failure of reconstruction in Iraq raises three questions. First, how much did that failure contribute to the overall failure of the war? Second, how was it that America, the great can-do nation, in this case couldn’t and didn’t? Finally, if we’ve given up on rebuilding Iraq, what are our troops dying for <br
There’s no definitive way to answer the first question. You can make a good case that the invasion of Iraq was doomed no matter what, because we never had enough military manpower to provide security. But the lack of electricity and clean water did a lot to dissipate any initial good will the Iraqis may have felt toward the occupation. And Iraqis are well aware that the billions squandered by American contractors included a lot of Iraqi oil revenue as well as U.S. taxpayers’ dollars <br
Consider the symbolism of Iraq’s new police academy, which Stuart Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, has called “the most essential civil security project in the country.” It was built at a cost of $75 million by Parsons Corporation, which received a total of about $1 billion for Iraq reconstruction projects. But the academy was so badly built that feces and urine leak from the ceilings in the student barracks <br
Think about it. We want the Iraqis to stand up so we can stand down. But if they do stand up, we’ll dump excrement on their heads <br
As for how this could have happened, that’s easy: major contractors believed, correctly, that their political connections insulated them from accountability. Halliburton and other companies with huge Iraq contracts were basically in the same position as Donald Rumsfeld: they were so closely identified with President Bush and, especially, Vice President Cheney that firing or even disciplining them would have been seen as an admission of personal failure on the part of top elected officials <br
As a result, the administration and its allies in Congress fought accountability all the way. Administration officials have made repeated backdoor efforts to close the office of Mr. Bowen, whose job is to oversee the use of reconstruction money. Just this past May, with the failed reconstruction already winding down, the White House arranged for the last $1.5 billion of reconstruction money to be placed outside Mr. Bowen’s jurisdiction. And now, finally, Congress has passed a bill whose provisions include the complete elimination of his agency next October <br
The bottom line is that those charged with rebuilding Iraq had no incentive to do the job right, so they didn’t <br
You can see, by the way, why a Democratic takeover of the House, if it happens next week, would be such a pivotal event: suddenly, committee chairmen with subpoena power would be in a position to investigate where all the Iraq money went <br
But that’s all in the past. What about the future <br
Back in June, after a photo-op trip to Iraq, Mr. Bush said something I agree with. “You can measure progress in megawatts of electricity delivered,” he declared. “You can measure progress in terms of oil sold on the market on behalf of the Iraqi people.” But what those measures actually show is the absence of progress. By any material measure, Iraqis are worse off than they were under Saddam <br
And we’re not planning to do anything about it: the U.S.-led reconstruction effort in Iraq is basically over. I don’t know whether the administration is afraid to ask U.S. voters for more money, or simply considers the situation hopeless. Either way, the United States has accepted defeat on reconstruction <br
Yet Americans are still fighting and dying in Iraq. For what
 
Are "we" this stupid? I fear the worst...

November 3, 200
Op-Ed Columnis
Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligenc
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMA <br
George Bush, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld think you’re stupid. Yes, they do <br
They think they can take a mangled quip about President Bush and Iraq by John Kerry — a man who is not even running for office but who, unlike Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, never ran away from combat service — and get you to vote against all Democrats in this election <br
Every time you hear Mr. Bush or Mr. Cheney lash out against Mr. Kerry, I hope you will say to yourself, “They must think I’m stupid.” Because they surely do <br
They think that they can get you to overlook all of the Bush team’s real and deadly insults to the U.S. military over the past six years by hyping and exaggerating Mr. Kerry’s mangled gibe at the president <br
What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to the U.S. military than to send it into combat in Iraq without enough men — to launch an invasion of a foreign country not by the Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force, but by the Rumsfeld Doctrine of just enough troops to lose? What could be a bigger insult than that <br
What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than sending them off to war without the proper equipment, so that some soldiers in the field were left to buy their own body armor and to retrofit their own jeeps with scrap metal so that roadside bombs in Iraq would only maim them for life and not kill them? And what could be more injurious and insulting than Don Rumsfeld’s response to criticism that he sent our troops off in haste and unprepared: Hey, you go to war with the army you’ve got — get over it <br
What could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in uniform than to send them off to war in Iraq without any coherent postwar plan for political reconstruction there, so that the U.S. military has had to assume not only security responsibilities for all of Iraq but the political rebuilding as well? The Bush team has created a veritable library of military histories — from “Cobra II” to “Fiasco” to “State of Denial” — all of which contain the same damning conclusion offered by the very soldiers and officers who fought this war: This administration never had a plan for the morning after, and we’ve been making it up — and paying the price — ever since <br
And what could possibly be more injurious and insulting to our men and women in Iraq than to send them off to war and then go out and finance the very people they’re fighting against with our gluttonous consumption of oil? Sure, George Bush told us we’re addicted to oil, but he has not done one single significant thing — demanded higher mileage standards from Detroit, imposed a gasoline tax or even used the bully pulpit of the White House to drive conservation — to end that addiction. So we continue to finance the U.S. military with our tax dollars, while we finance Iran, Syria, Wahhabi mosques and Al Qaeda madrassas with our energy purchases <br
Everyone says that Karl Rove is a genius. Yeah, right. So are cigarette companies. They get you to buy cigarettes even though we know they cause cancer. That is the kind of genius Karl Rove is. He is not a man who has designed a strategy to reunite our country around an agenda of renewal for the 21st century — to bring out the best in us. His “genius” is taking some irrelevant aside by John Kerry and twisting it to bring out the worst in us, so you will ignore the mess that the Bush team has visited on this country <br
And Karl Rove has succeeded at that in the past because he was sure that he could sell just enough Bush cigarettes, even though people knew they caused cancer. Please, please, for our country’s health, prove him wrong this time <br
Let Karl know that you’re not stupid. Let him know that you know that the most patriotic thing to do in this election is to vote against an administration that has — through sheer incompetence — brought us to a point in Iraq that was not inevitable but is now unwinnable <br
Let Karl know that you think this is a critical election, because you know as a citizen that if the Bush team can behave with the level of deadly incompetence it has exhibited in Iraq — and then get away with it by holding on to the House and the Senate — it means our country has become a banana republic. It means our democracy is in tatters because it is so gerrymandered, so polluted by money, and so divided by professional political hacks that we can no longer hold the ruling party to account <br
It means we’re as stupid as Karl thinks we are <br
I, for one, don’t think we’re that stupid. Next Tuesday we’ll see
 
Could this be any more Delicious?

I Just Love This, YAY <br
Pastor: Haggard admits to 'some' allegations even though th
Evangelical leader earlier denied man's claim that he paid for sex, drugs <br
Not only is Haggard a big right-wing republican religious hypocrite, now he's also a big fat liar! <br
YAY for the truth, this sure has been a fun election season. Let's drag more of these lovely people out of the closet.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15536263/
 

Similar threads

phillymatt53
The Home Entertainment Industry
2
Replies
49
Views
1K
phillymatt53
phillymatt53
H
Speed Queen TV2000wn - early review / permanent lid switch fix
Replies
3
Views
774
HighpowerXTL5K
H
thomasortega
Happy, happy, happy and I want to share my happiness with you
Replies
6
Views
122
thomasortega
thomasortega
Ultramatic
Right to Repair
Replies
6
Views
86
vacerator
V
F
So Many Questions
Replies
22
Views
173
fridgenut
F

Latest posts

Back
Top