With respect to polarized plugs etc: you may want to take a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthing_system and see the cause of a bunch of choices. For the record, no system is perfect, all have at least one big flaw, and "safe" and "good" is all about what you are used to and/or grew up with. (Me? I'd take the Schuko plug in a heartbeat, I'm fine and used to the US plugs, but I think that the "ring circuits" in UK are a little too unsafe. People in UK will probably think I'm an idiot and their system is the best around. Most Americans I know think anything that is not polarized and/or grounded are an accident waiting to happen, without knowing or taking into consideration that a double-insulated appliance is *safer* than a grounded appliance, for example.)
The Schuko plug was developed for the IT system: the relevant property is the voltage *difference* between live conductors and/or live and neutral. In the IT system, for all you know, neutral might be 500 V from ground, and live might be 750 V from ground, and you still have 250 V between live and neutral, which is OK. So all conductors (except for ground) are to be fully insulated and treated as live. You can in fact invert the plug in the outlet and the appliance will still work properly and not shock anyone.
As far as I'm concerned, polarization was a band-aid solution brought on by the TN and TT systems we use. The proper solution would have been to ban chassis carrying current, neutral connections to ground (*except* at the breaker box, which is what the newest NEC finally dictates, after way too many years of refusing to think about it -- we still have way too many stoves, ovens and dryers with the neutral bonded to the ground, which is not safe), and, most of all, lamp sockets the way they are in North America. If you take one look at the lamp sockets, you can tell the difference immediately: here in US you see the metal from the bulb socket exposed, in other countries the metal is hidden inside the socket and safe from casual touching... can you still be shocked while changing the bulb? Maybe, but then it's a situation you're much more likely to be paying attention to, instead of casually reaching into a lamp to turn it on. If you think you are safe because "one side is neutral and it's polarized", I have a few bridges to sell to you. Every time I move I walk around the new home with an outlet tester, and I can't tell you how many times I had to rewire them properly because the neutral and live were reversed -- now, except for one home, they were all "new" construction (built in the 70's or later) and should have passed an inspection, not to mention their electricians were supposed to be licensed and be doing everything right. One of these days I should get me one of those adaptors that screw in the ceiling lamps and check that those are properly wired too, although, to be fair, I don't have the blind faith many in here have that they are properly polarized, so I always take extra care when changing light bulbs. I know way too many people who just climbed a metal ladder barefoot and were shocked and I don't want to add to the statistics.
For the record, I'm not saying here we should get rid of neutrals and polarized outlets. I'm saying they are not enough and provide a false sense of security. We'd be better off if new regulation for things manufactured now acknowledged that just polarizing the outlet or even providing a ground are not enough: we should manufacture household equipment/appliances as if all the wires were live and insulate things properly -- it's a real shame that first world countries still let people manufacture stuff that can readily cause accidents if the outlet is wired incorrectly -- how many people here have witnessed christmas tree light strings shorting out when they touched tinsel? "Oh, I know, that's no problem, let's just put a *label* on the strings saying they are not to be used with tinsel, it will be alright!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthing_system