Speed Queen TR7 with a transmission!

[aussiestayover]

Hello, As a lover of top load washing machines I've been following the comments made on You Tube about the 'new' Speed Queen TR7.

As an Australian living in London I had enquired about shipping over a washer and dryer of the old model with the silver console (AWNE92SN303AWO1) as its known down under but was too late and the TR7 came out to replace it. The TR7 is known down under as - AWN92 Black.

I have only come to appreciate in the last weeks that the Australian model is fitted with a transmission and not the new 'Perfect Wash' system with the agitator bolted to the stainless steel wash tub.

Have a look at the link posted...

The only things I don't like on these Speed Queens are the 'Soak' program which pumps the water out after a time (My old 2002 Whirlpool direct drive Ultimate Care II doesn't do that, and the matching Speed Queen dryer which doesn't come with a hamper door or removable lint screen.

Apart from that I might just buy the pair now I know it still as a transmission with a decent wash... Does anyone want to buy a kidney (only slightly used) to help me finance it?

https://speedqueenhome.com.au/awne92-black/

 

[panasonicvac]

I've heard a while ago that SQ was developing a TC7 and was waiting for approval from the pentagon, I don't know if we'll ever get it or not.

 

[luxflairguy]

What would the Pentagon have to do with with approval? Please explain

 

[panasonicvac]

This was just a rumor that I've heard.

 

[DADoES]

 
The TR design apparently isn't marketed in Aus as neither of the two topload models on the website are the Perfect Wash mechanism.

 

[rp2813]

Pentagon

Maybe Alliance wants to put a new style 5-vane agitator in the TC7, or maybe there's a Fox News version of this site that we don't know about.

 

[windrivers]

Washing Machine Wars

Sad state of affairs. Australia gets machines made in the US that Americans would love to have, so we have to get the Pentagon involved because the Australians aren't going to give the machines back willingly.

 

[qsd-dan]

The TR design apparently isn't marketed in Aus

People actually get dirty out there, the TR series machines wouldn't fly.

 

[gelaundry4ever]

stupid of Speed Queen!

It was stupid of Speed Queen to come up with the perfect wash series. What were they thinking?

 

[windrivers]

Pentagon Washing Machine Contracts

It does strike me as possible that the Pentagon isn't satisfied with the choice and quality of washers available in the US today that they would make a deal with Speed Queen, a GSA contractor, to supply more of what they want for installation on military bases and such. The TC5 may be the washer that comes closest to be suitable for their purposes, but they want something with more configurable options as SQ may be phasing out the mechanical controls entirely. So I don't know what Alex may have heard, but it may not be all that implausible.

https://speedqueencommercial.com/en-us/military/

 

[combo52]

US military laundry purchases

When there was a shortage of Speed Queen front load washers a few years ago it was because the US military ordered tens of thousands of them.

I can’t imagine the US military would be stupid enough to buy top loading washers. They’re way too wasteful.

They also buy lots of Speed Queen dryers.

John

 

[windrivers]

Yeah, we know John, anyone who buys a TL today is stupid, there's no purpose for them. FL are so wonderful! You make me think of a used car salesman trying to get me to trade in my truck on a Yugo with all the stats you come up with, then when challenged on them you run to another thread.

Maybe they found that the physics-defying FLs didn't work as well for all their purposes as expected. Or maybe they have need of both. Maybe they have need to get a load done in less than an hour or two. Maybe space and time factors matter in some situations. Maybe today's military is stupid (and I say that as a vet) and maybe they're more concerned with mission over waste.

Do you really believe waste is the first factor the military considers? But then, who knows about today's military? They probably really need FLs because the TLs are just so harsh on their pretty dainties.

 

[windrivers]

I don't know, but I suspect there may be something to what "panasonicvac" heard. There is often a basis to rumors, and the only reason I can see the Pentagon being involved is for considering approval to purchase.

But another thought is that I believe there are supposed to be costs analysis done when the government purchases equipment. Given that FLs cost significantly more than TLs, and they probably replace equipment based on an expected cost-effective life cycle before it fails or needs significant repairs, they could have determined that FLs, at least in certain uses, don't recoup their excessive costs in waste during their term of service. I don't know what the government pays, but I know the SQ FLs are significantly more expensive than TLs.

Maybe they even consider the weight of the machines that may need to be transported to various areas. SQ FLs are also significantly heavier. John has argued that heavier machines are inherently more wasteful.

 

[combo52]

Speed, queen, commercial laundry

Hi Jeff , both of my front load speed queen washers the one that’s 18 years old and the one that’s three years old go through a quick cycle in 32 to 34 minutes even with an extra rinse selected.

Anybody that knows anything about engineering can see why a front load washer has a potential to last much longer than a top load washer. It’s just a much simpler machine.

Speed Queen engineers told us when we went through training about 12 years ago that they expect their front load washers to last 25,000 loads, we have seen them last almost 50,000 loads and heavy use situation’s.

Speed Queen claims and they’re advertising for home use that their machines last 10,500 loads but again anybody that knows anything about mechanical things and engineering. It’s obvious that , we have seen them last almost 50,000 loads and heavy use situation’s.

Speed Queen claims and their advertising for home use that their machines last 10,500 loads but again anybody that knows anything about mechanical things and engineering. It’s obvious that any dryer from just about any company will outlast two washing machines, yet they make the same claim for the dryers. Speed Queen does not want to over promise longevity, because people will hold them to it. There are just too many variables. Once machines get into consumer hands.

I’m only presenting the facts. You can have top loading washers all you want as can anybody else we live in a free country, being in an army family I don’t appreciate these disparaging remarks you’re making about the military, the US military has hundreds of people who work very hard to keep costs down.

John

 

[panasonicvac]

There's probably a very good chance that this rumor I've heard was just made up or misrepresented. I first found out on YouTube in a comment section and to be honest I forgot who it was that said there was a TC7 being developed. Even though it doesn't say much of where it came from, sometimes I find the comments to be true and sometimes I find them to be false. I could contact SQ to see if maybe they could shed me some light about the possibly of getting a TC7, I'm probably going to do so anyways because I also need to ask if their stainless steel FF7 and DF7 models have been discontinued or not. They're no longer listed on their website and I hope they're not gone for good.

 

[windrivers]

As I pointed out, I also come from a military family and an a vet myself. You sure like to twist things. I was mocking what you said about the military being stupid, and by implication, anyone who uses a TL being stupid, as if there's no reason anyone ever would. I don't appreciate that.

Maybe a FL, everything else being equal, will last longer than a TL, but again, is the military going to keep a machine for 50 years, assuming they would last that long? My points stand about the initial costs and everything else. I know while the military owns and maintains most of their equipment, I don't know if that includes washing machine maintenance or not. As far as I know they may have some kind of contract maintenance for that, the costs and duration of which may help determine which machines to get. When I was in the military I don't recall a career field that would cover that, but maybe there was.

How well is a "quick load" going to work for what ever purposes the military may select their machines for? Maybe well, for the hundreds of people working to keep costs down, but not so well for those in the field or for the types of equipment they wash, would be my guess.

I think if you'll consider what I said, mission should come above what many, including you, might consider waste in the military.

 

[windrivers]

By the way, I wouldn't think that anyone who knows anything about mechanical things and engineering, and cares about longevity, would think machines are less wasteful based on their lighter weight.

 

[brisnat81]

Jeff, you have to think about whole of life costs. Weight uses energy to ship and energy in materials to build. The bigger something is, the less you fit in a container and therefore the more trucking you need and the more fuel thats consumed.

Its a fine balance between Weight, Material type, Longevity, Energy consumed during operation, Effectiveness at its designed purpose, location of manufacture, freight, recyclability etc etc.

All of these things make up the total energy used by a product. Its not just how much it costs to run per load.

 

[windrivers]

Thanks. But life costs are exactly what I was talking about, as explained on another thread, a washing machine that uses a lot of plastic parts that is designed to last 10 years, if you're lucky, isn't at all likely to be more resource friendly than a machine that last 20 years or more, even considering shipping costs and all. A washer is generally shipped to a home once, as least I'm not planning on moving ever again, and I've never moved with a washer. A 120 lb washer that has to replaced 2 or three times or more than a 150 lb washer isn't going to save resources used in transportation and such. So there is a lot more to it. Sometimes you have to use a little common sense. My whole point was that machines based on planned obsolescence save nothing, and the idea that they are 100% recyclable with no additional resources used is a myth. I believe washers used to be considered "durable" products, I, at least, now consider most of them disposable. As for size, aren't most of these cheap machines actually larger than the old ones, if anything?

I thinks it's strange to live in a disposable society that pretends to care about conservation.

I know SQ TLs weigh significantly more than the cheap Maytags, and I also expect the SQs to last significantly longer, and I suspect the SQ FLs also weigh more than most of the competition.

I just find it funny that John thinks lighter machines are better as he seems to forget that front loaders tend to weigh significantly more.

I'm also curious how long John has seen SQ TLs last, surely longer than the 10,400 or whatever cycles they claim, or is it just the FLs Speed Queen doesn't want to over claim longevity on? Frankly, he seems to be so biased for some reason that I'm not sure I can expect a candid answer. (I don't meant that to offend, but that's my observation.) Even if they only last 10,400 loads, at a couple loads a week, or even 3 loads a week, I still expect it to be my last machine (hopefully).

As for being stupid for not getting a FL, along with all the other points I made on other threads, here's a math equation for you: if I average no more than about 2 loads a week. I use well water, my water is heated with electricity, and my total electric bill averages less than $40 a month including recurring monthly fees and everything, probably around $25 not including fees, I don't know what the share for laundry would be, a couple bucks, maybe? How long would it take me to recoup the $800 more for a SQ FL over a SQ TL in energy savings? Feel free to add in the detergent too.

Then John has brought up one good point: the weight! The Maytag I had that lasted almost eight months, thanks to it's light weight engineering, I was pretty much able to toss that thing around, I moved it and installed it myself, and it was almost a pleasure to toss it out the door after Whirlpool gave me a full refund after failing to fix it or send the replacement machine they promised. The Speed Queen tried to fight me some up the steps and over the threshold, but was still manageable. I do appreciate that it is more maneuverable than a FL would be so I don't have to call other guys to help if I need to move it for some reason. Another point for TLs!

Stupid and wasteful or not, I do like my old traditional (more or less, we in fact are not as free as we used to be in our selection) TL washer.