This is why I try to buy "Professional" products whenever I can. In other words, I buy what the professionals use. It costs more, but I find I get such a longer lifespan out of them. There is no room for planned obsolescence for these products.
Did you know that Bryston Amplifiers have a 20 year warranty? They also cost $6k too.

When I did some work in the broadcast industry, it's all anyone ever considered using to drive the studio monitors.
I wouldn't ever purchase an inkjet printer because that's not what IT professionals purchase. They purchase managed laser printers.
Talking about longevity, Back in 1998, I purchased a Samsung Quiklaser 6000. It's still on the same toner cartridge that came with it when I bought it! It still works. (Yes, it set me back nearly $900 when I bought it, but it was worth it.)
I gave it to my father who is still using it. In the meanwhile, I foolishly purchased a multi-function device that bricked itself as soon as we had a power outage. (You don't connect laser printers up to a UPS.)
Professional multifunction devices cost around $10k-$20k, so I can't afford one. Buying one for $300 seems like a steal, but the old saying goes, "You get what you pay for."
What really irks me is when a person spends a LOT on an item but gets performance and longevity which is comparable to a much cheaper unit.
This seems especially true when it comes to washing machines.
Being in the IT field, what I'm seeing in the stores both amazes me and disgusts me. It used to be that purchasing an HP Laserjet 3 would set one back about $1500... I've seen LJ 3's with over a 1.5 million pages on the clock, which is downright remarkable.
Now, you can go out and buy a laser printer for $80.. it costs almost as much to replace the cartridge as what the printer itself costs.
I personally stay away from anything IT which uses the Gillette-Style of marketing whenever I can. (They call that Razor Blade Marketing.. Pay a low price for the razor, spend a fortune on the blades.)
I wish that HP would build those old LJ 3/4 printers again, charge a hair short of $2k for them and build them so tough and durable like they used to.
BTW, I went to a garage door shop and was amazed they were still using HP Laserjet 4's from the early 90's.. Saw the manufacture date on one from 1992.. The receptionist was thoroughly confused as to why I wanted to see the date. You have to think for a second, that printer is 20 years old.. it's outlasted Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME (Ugh), Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Vista... Back when it was built, the Pentium had just been introduced and 486's were still on the market.. (BTW, The 486 was the first chip to break 1 million transistors, chips today now have roughly 2 billion transistors now.)
I don't know what happened at HP, but there used to be a day when the only brand one would consider in an IT world was HP, because they were so damn reliable. When they did break down, it was a cheap fix to get them back up and running again.
Now I'm on a rant...