That's because they are changing the "culture" at Whirlpool.
Great post!American culture needs to change demanding their old appliances back. People who blindly buy, let the company become anything.
Yes Chet, and one front load washer was from Bauknecht of Deutschland. As far as demanding back old technology, is living in the past. Ist gone. Mover on.
California barely has enough drinking water. The global population has surpased 8 billion. That's common sense.
The issue is that design foisted a smaller space lower rack when the competing brands were all going to flat lower racks. Easier to load. Fit pots better.I honestly wouldn't mind going back to a wash tower. I think Maytag's Jetclean version was solid.
View attachment 316999
You say that as their dishwashers have the most innovative 3rd rack in the industry, currently?Whirlpool has stopped innovating. They've fallen behind. Though I feel like they switched to European technology when they went with their manual clean filter dishwashers and tiny pumps.
You say that as their dishwashers have the most innovative 3rd rack in the industry, currently?
The issue is that design foisted a smaller space lower rack when the competing brands were all going to flat lower racks. Easier to load. Fit pots better.
That’s when GE, the big user of power towers, made their flat design that looked like it came out of a chilly pool.
How do they use more water? The only way I can figure that is if the water isn't hot enough in the pre wash, and it purges and fills until the thermister senses it is hot enough. Other wise it is much less. Wash times are longer regardless. The older single motor wash/drain pumps needed more water to make the same pressure for the wash arms because the sumps and impellers were larger. The DM Roto racks had to move the top spinning racks. The member from California who said higher up in the thread that college educated ones advising the bureucrats are stupid is ignorant. If he knows so much, then he should go do it and lobby for old technology.Modern dishwashers use more water than older ones, like 20 times more. Thats not progress. Neither are all the premature failures.
How do they use more water? The only way I can figure that is if the water isn't hot enough in the pre wash, and it purges and fills until the thermister senses it is hot enough. Other wise it is much less. Wash times are longer regardless. The older single motor wash/drain pumps needed more water to make the same pressure for the wash arms because the sumps and impellers were larger. The DM Roto racks had to move the top spinning racks. The member from California who said higher up in the thread that college educated ones advising the bureucrats are stupid is ignorant. If he knows so much, then he should go do it and lobby for old technology.
User pre-rinsing. Most Americans with a tall tub pre-rinse in various degrees. With the amount of water used pre-rinsing and pre-treating, it would make more sense to just add soap to a sponge spending a few extra seconds washing everything by hand.
With a Power Clean Filter Module water never touches anything beforehand. Tilt, scrape, load, accumulate and then run a cycle. Dishware, silverware, bakeware, pots, pans and other items can be loaded as is and can accumulate as is over a day or two. In just one cycle both dishes and the machine come out spotless, clean, film free and sanitized. No odors, no smells, no clogged holes, no afresh, no manual clean filters, no food bits at the bottom, no residue. Nothing left behind other than immuculate kitchenware.
Many gallons of water are saved along with the energy used to heat with a load-as-is dishwasher.
Do you have quantifiable evidence, or is your statement speculative?There are many in America who are forced to pre-rinse their dishes.