3beltwesty
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 1,057
The issue is not one of materials, it is the seam/weld fails
RE
"I think the problem is that their really enormous load machines are just pushing beyond the laws of physics. They are using relatively cheap materials and thin drums in huge capacity machines with 1600rpm spins.
They either need to reduce the capacity, the spin speed or improve the quality."
The issue is not one of materials, it is the seam/weld fails.
It really is NOT a high tech issue at all.
The issue is basic. ie it is like a many thousands of years old issue. ie somebody welds/bonds two pieces of metal together, and the darn joint fails.
Issues with the joint failing are thousands of years old.
When poor workmanship is done the joint can fail, whether a Roman piece of iron, a medieval suite of armour, an 1800's steam engines boiler, or a 2011 washing machine.
The problem is one of practical engineering, not physics which has zero legal standing with product liability.
What one has is some poor/bad/sloppy/slacker/crummy seams are in the joint of the 201 stainless steel drum, and a tiny few fail.
**** The base metal does not fail, the seam does.
This points to sloppy quality control, often a way corners are cut to get costs down. Or is is an oversight.
ISSUES like this often have no magical way to ferret out the few bad/poor actual devices in the field, without a total super costly recall.
RE
"I think the problem is that their really enormous load machines are just pushing beyond the laws of physics. They are using relatively cheap materials and thin drums in huge capacity machines with 1600rpm spins.
They either need to reduce the capacity, the spin speed or improve the quality."
The issue is not one of materials, it is the seam/weld fails.
It really is NOT a high tech issue at all.
The issue is basic. ie it is like a many thousands of years old issue. ie somebody welds/bonds two pieces of metal together, and the darn joint fails.
Issues with the joint failing are thousands of years old.
When poor workmanship is done the joint can fail, whether a Roman piece of iron, a medieval suite of armour, an 1800's steam engines boiler, or a 2011 washing machine.
The problem is one of practical engineering, not physics which has zero legal standing with product liability.
What one has is some poor/bad/sloppy/slacker/crummy seams are in the joint of the 201 stainless steel drum, and a tiny few fail.
**** The base metal does not fail, the seam does.
This points to sloppy quality control, often a way corners are cut to get costs down. Or is is an oversight.
ISSUES like this often have no magical way to ferret out the few bad/poor actual devices in the field, without a total super costly recall.