Austin
What makes it a dream machine is the control styling but also I find the early Bendix Gyromatics to be "un" designed esthetically from a consumer standpoint. You look at my old '53 which John has and the dials are well..uninspiring.
These last several years of Bendix 55,56,57 all had industrial desgin pumped back into them like the original 1930's models. They were designed to attract the consumer to catch their eye.
And this one is especially dear because it does not say Philco anywhere on it.
I'm not saying I am anti-Philco but I am very Pro-Bendix now that I have read their history.
You know I always overlooked these machines because they were so simple, so basic. I didn't realize that ,that element of simplicity was due to them being the first in everything to do with most automatics -frontload or topload. Their patent base forced all their competition to go in very different directions---just look at the shape of the Westinghouse slant front tub & vanes for starters!!
In 1939 Westinghouse paid Bendix $125,000 to use the flush drain technology for their front loader. In today;s money that is equivalent to $3.0 million dollars to use a patent!
Today we take flush/drain for granted but in 1936 that had to be invented it didn't exist.
And thats just one example of how I have come to admire Bendix Home Appliances.
They also invented the BEST tub damping system ever used for a front loader but hardly anyone has ever seen it!! They only used it for one year in the Gyramatics and I have one I found by accident, it is like no other Bendix ever built,AND it is more stable than any other FL I have ever used.
Again they lost use of the technology because the Home appliance division got sold off from the Aviation division early on and the patent was done by one of the aviation engineers. So that is when they were forced to go to the 4 spring 2 shock technology.
Which is good but not as good as what they had.
I could go on and on.
jet