Best FL washer ever built

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

I’ve always liked the look of those machines. Unfortunately I never had the chance to get one new. I do see them for sale on the used market once in a while though. What makes them so good performance wise?
 
Best front load

I had a Maytag Neptune - now an LG 4370

I work on them as well, as far as they are built. Yes they are pretty solid machines. Performance wise, I think Neptune’s had balancing act figured out pretty well. I could leave things on top of the washer and know it won’t fall to the ground. LG isn’t so bad, but more vibration.

Whirlpool platform, during the Neptune years. I felt had better performance in cleaning power and electronics- though long cycle times were a price to pay.

If Neptune’s were still around today like LG’s consistency of making their washers. I’m pretty sure Neptune’s would be the best out there.

Though, I really like my LG. Super fast and cleans really well.
 
Speed Queen Front Load

Is hands down the best FLW for home use ever in North America, it is like comparing a KDS-17 KA DW to all other US DWs in the 70s. 

 

SQ is based completely on a real commercial machine, there are no differences what so ever, SQ engineers tell they can easily last 25,000 loads, and we have had 3 that we know of that have gone over 45,000 and they have been retired to some of our customers and are still in everyday use, none of these three have had bearings replaced.

 

I guess the runner-up would be the Maytag Neptunes as they were even built and used in commercial settings .

 

The original German built WP Duets were also pretty rugged in the bearing and spider areas but fell in electronics area and cheap plastic fasteners everywhere.

 

I don't have enough experiences with LG to make a judgment, I do know that SS and FD just can not be considered great FL machines for overall reliability and repairability.

 

John L.
 
The only upgrades I would make to the Neptune FL system would be 1) Twice as many rotations between reversing directions during tumbling/agitation, 2) Larger capacity, and 3) An on-board heater.

 

After seeing the video of a SQ FL full cycle in a recent thread, I was disappointed with its multiple attempts at balancing, but I don't think there's a modern FL out there that can beat a Neptune in that regard.
 
SQ FL Washers

Do Not have any balancing issues,

 

I do not know what you are seeing Ralph, My SQ FL washer has never failed to balance and spin a load, which cannot be said about A Neptune FL washer, balancing issues were quite common on NT FL washers because they can tie loads into a ball and then can not balance and spin them.

 

John L.
 
John, please re-read my post.  I did not say that SQ FL machines fail to spin.  I have no basis for making such a statement.  I said that based on the video (see link), they appear to have similar trouble balancing to that of other modern FL machines.

 

Furthermore, my Neptune has never failed to spin and it has never spent a prolonged period attempting to balance prior to spin (unlike its Affinity predecessor -- and yes, before you go there, I do understand that a SQ does not equal a Frigidaire).

 

But go ahead, have fun.  Knock yourself out shooting holes into others' posts.

 

 
It would be interesting to talk to the original Neptune design team.  I've always wondered why they didn't include a window in the door...was it purely a cost-saving measure or were there other considerations?

 

One of the notable things about the Neptune is the very loud fluid-filled balancing ring.  It gives the impression that there's far more water splashing about inside than there really is.  With no window, the secret is safe.
 
harmonic vibration dampening assembly

Thanks...I wondered if the door was hollow, but that is not so. 

 

Like everything else, I found a YouTube video.  Jump to 4:00 to see the dampening assembly.

 

Latest posts

Back
Top