arbilab
Well-known member
Lively discussion
Brands? What are those? Those legacy names vendors used to build reputations on? But are now leased by everyone to anyone?
What are reputations? Like, everything bought from Walmart is 2 reputations below the same thing bought anywhere else and nobody seems to care?
Internet told me this was 2015. Not that that's trustworthy by itself but seems corroborated by pgh 1 & 2 and a lot of other stuff. Like a Fudgesicle (tm) has an ingredient list 4 times longer than my Xenolin (tm) skin lotion and 4 times less comprehensible. Something must have changed when nobody was looking.
Above:
Nothing wrong with OCD laundry habits. Name of the game.
Sebum-- the primary laundry contaminant-- is a semisolid wax below 90F and by its nature, hydrophobic. That is to say, if you thought it was insoluble as a liquid it's downright impervious to water as a solid.
Not that it's a crime to misunderstand the physical world, but try this test: Put a cup of Tide in a cup of 70F water. Put a candle in it. Wait a day/week/month/year/decade and see how much of the candle dissolved. Weigh it before/after if you don't believe your eyes.
The French may have a word for what less-than-90F water does to wax but I double-damn guarantee it doesn't translate as "wash" in ANY language.
<90F water can 'wash' dust from drapes. That's really about it. And even that doesn't work if the occupant smokes.
Maybe Whirlfool should relicense the RCA prefix like they did before when RCA was well on its way to irrelevancy as a brand name.
Brands? What are those? Those legacy names vendors used to build reputations on? But are now leased by everyone to anyone?
What are reputations? Like, everything bought from Walmart is 2 reputations below the same thing bought anywhere else and nobody seems to care?
Internet told me this was 2015. Not that that's trustworthy by itself but seems corroborated by pgh 1 & 2 and a lot of other stuff. Like a Fudgesicle (tm) has an ingredient list 4 times longer than my Xenolin (tm) skin lotion and 4 times less comprehensible. Something must have changed when nobody was looking.
Above:
Nothing wrong with OCD laundry habits. Name of the game.
Sebum-- the primary laundry contaminant-- is a semisolid wax below 90F and by its nature, hydrophobic. That is to say, if you thought it was insoluble as a liquid it's downright impervious to water as a solid.
Not that it's a crime to misunderstand the physical world, but try this test: Put a cup of Tide in a cup of 70F water. Put a candle in it. Wait a day/week/month/year/decade and see how much of the candle dissolved. Weigh it before/after if you don't believe your eyes.
The French may have a word for what less-than-90F water does to wax but I double-damn guarantee it doesn't translate as "wash" in ANY language.
<90F water can 'wash' dust from drapes. That's really about it. And even that doesn't work if the occupant smokes.
Maybe Whirlfool should relicense the RCA prefix like they did before when RCA was well on its way to irrelevancy as a brand name.